Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
stratmat · Stratmat, a general Strat-O-Matic forum
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Happy New Year from your Stratmat group!   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #235 of 700 |
Fellow list members:

I hope you all had a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.

This message was sent as a "special notice," meaning that you got this
in your e-mail even if you don't normally get messages from this
group. This annual special notice is my way of detecting which e-mail
addresses have become deadwood, so I can cut them loose. It's also a
way of reminding those who aren't getting e-mail the rest of the year
that they are still members. I presume those who forgot they are
members and don't *want* to be anymore know how to unsubscribe. :-)

Anyway, as long as I'm writing anyway, I also wanted to point out the
four articles that appeared in Strat's official Strat-O-Sphere article
section on Dec. 15 and 22:

http://www.strat-o-matic.com/sphere.html

The "2006 Baseball Range Ratings Preview" has preliminary fielding
ratings of the still-unreleased 2006 season. This is useful if you
want to see how your favorite team did defensively, but for a good
summary on defense ratings, check out the article "Solid Gold." It
points out who's hot (Derek Jeter, Omar Vizquel, rookie Ryan
Zimmerman) and who's not (A-Rod, who fell all the way to a "3"; plus a
lot of longtime "1"-rated players who dropped to "2," including Jim
Edmonds and Todd Helton.)

And then there's the self-explanatory article titled "1951 is next."
As of 2008, those of you who are so inclined can see if the Giants can
steal the N.L. championship again.

I don't know yet if I'll be inclined to buy this set. It's not as
exciting to me as the soon-to-be-released 1971 season, but I like 1951
a lot more than 1957, the past-season offering from last year.

One thing in 1951's favor is that both leagues had close races, with a
handful of teams only a season or three removed from one of their
respective truly great years. In Cleveland's case, you get a team
that's sandwiched three years apart from *two* great seasons. But
despite the Indians' great pitching and 93 wins that year, the team
could only come in second. (Hmm, sounds familiar somehow...)

Anyway, 1951 also has the highly touted rookie seasons of teenage
rookies Willie Mays and Mickey Mantle; in fact, 1951 was the only
season that Mantle and DiMaggio played together. Too bad that
DiMaggio's last year was not exactly up to DiMaggio standards. You
also can get Ned Garver from the season he won 20 games with the
52-102 St. Louis Browns, and came in second in the MVP balloting to
Yogi Berra, who himself was one season off his career year.

But that's for later. For now, I'm looking forward to the 2006 and
1971 sets!

-Gary




Tue Jan 2, 2007 7:21 am

indiansfaninpa
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #235 of 700 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Fellow list members: I hope you all had a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. This message was sent as a "special notice," meaning that you got this in your...
Gary Kirchherr
indiansfaninpa
Offline Send Email
Jan 2, 2007
7:22 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help