Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
sportscience · The Science of Sport and Exercise
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Bad reviewing of statistics in one of our journals   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #3413 of 3439 |
RE: Bad reviewing of statistics in one of our journals

Will,

How much do you think that this is just bad reviewing/misunderstanding about
magnitude based inferences, and how much comes down to not knowing what is
clinically meaningful about all types of data. I find it easy to apply the
inferential model to performance where you and others can provide us with
measures of CV of the outcomes. However, i am not sure where to "draw the line"
on blood glucose or pulmonary oxygen

Louise

Will's reply:

Standardization provides the default value for the smallest important difference
or change in the mean of a mechanism or other variable that does not have a
known relationship with competitive performance.

Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:55 am

Louise.Burke@...
Send Email Send Email

Attachment
image002.gif
Type:
image/gif
Forward
Message #3413 of 3439 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

We've all been victims of bad reviewing, but I would like to share a particularly egregious example that someone has just shared with me, from a paper rejected...
Will Hopkins
willhopkinsnz
Offline Send Email
Aug 27, 2009
11:21 pm

Will, How much do you think that this is just bad reviewing/misunderstanding about magnitude based inferences, and how much comes down to not knowing what is...
Louise Burke
Louise.Burke@...
Send Email
Aug 31, 2009
7:25 am

First up, on the review, while we can't say from the information provided whether the science was not up to scratch, the reviewer's comments are totally out of...
Rowlands, David
dsrowlan
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2009
10:40 pm

My impression of the medical sciences is that effect sizes is a poor alternative to using minimal important differences. Effect sizes were used much more often...
Ian Shrier
ianshrier
Offline Send Email
Sep 2, 2009
12:46 am

I've already had one message from a colleague who has got the wrong idea as a result of the message Dave Rowlands just posted, so I have to clarify it. Dave...
Will Hopkins
willhopkinsnz
Offline Send Email
Sep 2, 2009
12:56 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help