Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
seuniultimate · South East University Ultimate
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Ladder League's future   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #379 of 642 |
Re: Ladder League's future

Just my two cents... as a UCL player who perhaps play more open ultimate than most Uni teams, it doesn't make much sense to me to allow open teams to play in the student ladder league. We get plenty of open competition by playing Mixed and Open Tour and London Summer League in the summer and London Winter League in the winter. Having a separate student league is brilliant for bringing student ultimate together - we love travelling around, playing some ultimate then getting toasted in a student union. Furthermore, I can't see what any open team would gain from playing student teams when there are plenty of open options for them to pursue.
 
One improvement I would suggest for Ladder League would be to try and organise regular events, rather than random events throughout the year - last year there were clearly teams that played many more games than others, which showed in the final standings.
 
All in all, student ultimate for student teams. If a student team wants more open experience/competition, then they should enter London Winter League or similar.
 
Easy
UCL #3

----- Original Message ----
From: seuniultimate@yahoogroups.com
To: seuniultimate@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, 19 July, 2006 9:12:05 AM
Subject: [seuniultimate] Digest Number 215

Messages In This Digest (4 Messages)

1a.
Re: Ladder League's future From: Emmanuel Bennett
1b.
Re: Ladder League's future From: David Gate
1c.
Re: Ladder League's future From: Jim Loader
1d.
Re: Ladder League's future From: Gemma Taylor

Messages

1a.

Re: Ladder League's future

Posted by: "Emmanuel Bennett" mannymooo@...   ultimatemannymooo

Tue Jul 18, 2006 5:19 am (PST)

Hi SEUU,

My first thoughts on the subject go something like this:

"More teams=more competition"

Crucially, this will increase the amount of local competition for new teams
(who might otherwise have to struggle to convince newer players to travel),
which can only be a good thing.

I can't really see any downsides to the expansion of ladder league, but I
haven't had any second thoughts really.

Enjoy the sunshine,

Manny
dD and Flump #31

>From: Felix <felix37@gmail. com>
>To: "seuniultimate@ yahoogroups. com" <seuniultimate@ yahoogroups. com>
>Subject: [seuniultimate] Ladder League's future
>Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:43:52 +0100
>
>Hi folks,
>
>There is talk currently going on about the possibility of allowing
>club teams (non-university) to compete in regional Ladder Leagues
>alongside university teams - in other words, incorporating them into
>SEULL instead of creating a separate Open Ladder League from scratch.
>
>As the university players with the most Ladder League experience, what
>are your initial thoughts about this?
>
>Felix

1b.

Re: Ladder League's future

Posted by: "David Gate" d_p_gate@...   d_p_gate1985

Tue Jul 18, 2006 12:58 pm (PST)


Thort i mite as well put my 2 cents in. Fraid they aint as
positive as manny was.

With most open teams playing in the high standard open tours and
london winter league i doubt many will want to do battle against
uni teams if they can set up a much more compitive open ladder
league. Although i guess most uni teams would want to leave the
uni ladder league system so they could play in the open ladder
league.

also it may limit ladder league events to be held on weekends as
no open teams will be able to make week day afternoons.

It could also discourage some uni players playing for there uni
teams if they can play for there open team.

If think over the past year ladder league has brought our region
together alot more. Without there wouldnt be as much intergration
between teams and regionals. I reckon we should keep it that way,
and with a region with over 20teams who needs any more
competition.

Any thorts guys and gals???

Shimmy

South East Uni Ultimate Co-ordinator

Brunel #32


From: "Emmanuel Bennett" <mannymooo@hotmail. com>
To: seuniultimate@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: RE: [seuniultimate] Ladder League's future
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:15:52 +0000


Hi SEUU,

My first thoughts on the subject go something like this:

"More teams=more competition"

Crucially, this will increase the amount of local competition for
new teams
(who might otherwise have to struggle to convince newer players
to travel),
which can only be a good thing.

I can't really see any downsides to the expansion of ladder
league, but I
haven't had any second thoughts really.

Enjoy the sunshine,

Manny
dD and Flump #31

>From: Felix <felix37@gmail. com <mailto:felix37@gmail. com> >
>To: "seuniultimate@ yahoogroups. com
<mailto:seuniultimate@ yahoogroups. com> "
<seuniultimate@ yahoogroups. com
<mailto:seuniultimate@ yahoogroups. com> >
>Subject: [seuniultimate] Ladder League's future
>Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:43:52 +0100
>
>Hi folks,
>
>There is talk currently going on about the possibility of
allowing
>club teams (non-university) to compete in regional Ladder
Leagues
>alongside university teams - in other words, incorporating them
into
>SEULL instead of creating a separate Open Ladder League from
scratch.
>
>As the university players with the most Ladder League
experience, what
>are your initial thoughts about this?
>
>Felix


#ygrp-mlmsg
{font-size:13px; font-family: arial,helvetica, clean,sans- serif;}
#ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit; font:100% ;} #ygrp-mlmsg
select, input, textarea {font:99%
arial,helvetica, clean,sans- serif;} #ygrp-mlmsg pre, code
{font:115% monospace;} #ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height: 1.22em;}
#ygrp-text {font-family: Georgia;} #ygrp-text p {margin:0 0 1em
0;} #ygrp-tpmsgs {font-family: Arial;clear: both;} #ygrp-vitnav
{padding-top: 10px;font- family:Verdana; font-size: 77%;margin: 0;}
#ygrp-vitnav a {padding:0 1px;} #ygrp-actbar
{clear:both; margin:25px
0;white-space: nowrap;color: #666;text- align:right; } #ygrp-actbar
.left {float:left; white-space: nowrap;} .bld {font-weight: bold;}
#ygrp-grft {font-family: Verdana;font- size:77%; padding:15px 0;}
#ygrp-ft {font-family: verdana;font- size:77%; border-top: 1px solid
#666;padding: 5px 0;} #ygrp-mlmsg #logo {padding-bottom: 10px;}
#ygrp-vital
{background- color:#e0ecee; margin-bottom: 20px;padding: 2px 0 8px
8px;} #ygrp-vital #vithd
{font-size:77% ;font-family: Verdana;font- weight:bold; color:#333; te\
xt-transform: uppercase; } #ygrp-vital ul {padding:0;margin: 2px 0;}
#ygrp-vital ul li {list-style- type:none; clear:both; border:1px
solid #e0ecee;} #ygrp-vital ul li .ct
{font-weight: bold;color: #ff7900;float: right;width: 2em;text- align:\
right;padding- right:.5em; } #ygrp-vital ul li .cat
{font-weight: bold;} #ygrp-vital a {text-decoration: none;}
#ygrp-vital a:hover {text-decoration: underline; } #ygrp-sponsor
#hd {color:#999; font-size: 77%;} #ygrp-sponsor #ov {padding:6px
13px;background- color:#e0ecee; margin-bottom: 20px;} #ygrp-sponsor
#ov ul {padding:0 0 0 8px;margin:0; } #ygrp-sponsor #ov li
{list-style- type:square; padding:6px 0;font-size: 77%;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ov li a {text-decoration: none;font- size:130% ;}
#ygrp-sponsor #nc
{background- color:#eee; margin-bottom: 20px;padding: 0 8px;}
#ygrp-sponsor .ad {padding:8px 0;} #ygrp-sponsor .ad #hd1
{font-family: Arial;font- weight:bold; color:#628c2a; font-size: 100%;\
line-height: 122%;} #ygrp-sponsor .ad a {text-decoration: none;}
#ygrp-sponsor .ad a:hover {text-decoration: underline; }
#ygrp-sponsor .ad p {margin:0;} o {font-size:0; } .MsoNormal
{margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrp-text tt {font-size:120% ;} blockquote
{margin:0 0 0 4px;} .replbq {margin:4;}
1c.

Re: Ladder League's future

Posted by: "Jim Loader" jim_ldr@...   jim_ldr

Tue Jul 18, 2006 6:20 pm (PST)

I'm agreeing with some of Shimmy's points I think. I think that if more teams were encorporated then it could make a weekend/weekday divide. Personally I wouldn't stop wanting to host or attend weekday fixtures if open teams were involved as wednesdays (and other weekdays) are great for students. Does this then mean there would be seperate weekend fixtures? I guess it would. However some uni's might not do weekend fixtures well or some might prefer them. Basically would this create two seperate times of the week and two seperate groups of teams? We all know how many ladder league fixtures appear in the uni timetable and some students do have to work and this is usually done at the weekend. In short would there be a uni at weekdays thing and open teams at weekends thing going on? Or am I just talking crazy and we students can't get enough ultimate and would play as much as we can get?

Jim

Roehampton Ultimate

David Gate <d_p_gate@hotmail. com> wrote:
Thort i mite as well put my 2 cents in. Fraid they aint as positive as manny was.
With most open teams playing in the high standard open tours and london winter league i doubt many will want to do battle against uni teams if they can set up a much more compitive open ladder league. Although i guess most uni teams would want to leave the uni ladder league system so they could play in the open ladder league.
also it may limit ladder league events to be held on weekends as no open teams will be able to make week day afternoons.
It could also discourage some uni players playing for there uni teams if they can play for there open team.
If think over the past year ladder league has brought our region together alot more. Without there wouldnt be as much intergration between teams and regionals. I reckon we should keep it that way, and with a region with over 20teams who needs any more competition.
Any thorts guys and gals???
Shimmy
South East Uni Ultimate Co-ordinator
Brunel #32

------------ --------- --------- ---
From: "Emmanuel Bennett" <mannymooo@hotmail. com>
To: seuniultimate@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: RE: [seuniultimate] Ladder League's future
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:15:52 +0000

Hi SEUU,

My first thoughts on the subject go something like this:

"More teams=more competition"

Crucially, this will increase the amount of local competition for new teams
(who might otherwise have to struggle to convince newer players to travel),
which can only be a good thing.

I can't really see any downsides to the expansion of ladder league, but I
haven't had any second thoughts really.

Enjoy the sunshine,

Manny
dD and Flump #31

>From: Felix <felix37@gmail. com>
>To: "seuniultimate@ yahoogroups. com" <seuniultimate@ yahoogroups. com>
>Subject: [seuniultimate] Ladder League's future
>Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:43:52 +0100
>
>Hi folks,
>
>There is talk currently going on about the possibility of allowing
>club teams (non-university) to compete in regional Ladder Leagues
>alongside university teams - in other words, incorporating them into
>SEULL instead of creating a separate Open Ladder League from scratch.
>
>As the university players with the most Ladder League experience, what
>are your initial thoughts about this?
>
>Felix


------------ --------- --------- ---
All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." - PC Magazine
1d.

Re: Ladder League's future

Posted by: "Gemma Taylor" me01gmt@...   gembily

Tue Jul 18, 2006 6:59 pm (PST)

Allowing for open team inclusion should create greater diversity in the
league, and give those uni's seperated by distance some incentive to play
their local open teams. (Keeping the open / uni communications going is
always a positive!)

Remember the great thing about the ladder league is it encourages playing
games at all levels - from beginner to first team. This ethic will more than
likely carry on into the open teams that participate, providing a greater
player base to compete against.

More competition makes for a more exciting league, who cares if its a uni or
open team your up against - the most important thing is great competiton and
a cheap drink afterwards!

Gemma.

On 18/07/06, David Gate <d_p_gate@hotmail. com> wrote:
>
> Thort i mite as well put my 2 cents in. Fraid they aint as positive as
> manny was.
>
> With most open teams playing in the high standard open tours and london
> winter league i doubt many will want to do battle against uni teams if they
> can set up a much more compitive open ladder league. Although i guess most
> uni teams would want to leave the uni ladder league system so they could
> play in the open ladder league.
>
> also it may limit ladder league events to be held on weekends as no open
> teams will be able to make week day afternoons.
>
> It could also discourage some uni players playing for there uni teams if
> they can play for there open team.
>
> If think over the past year ladder league has brought our region together
> alot more. Without there wouldnt be as much intergration between teams and
> regionals. I reckon we should keep it that way, and with a region with over
> 20teams who needs any more competition.
>
> Any thorts guys and gals???
>
> Shimmy
>
> South East Uni Ultimate Co-ordinator
>
> Brunel #32
>
> ------------ --------- ---------
> From: *"Emmanuel Bennett" <mannymooo@hotmail. com>*
> To: *seuniultimate@ yahoogroups. com*
> Subject: *RE: [seuniultimate] Ladder League's future*
> Date: *Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:15:52 +0000*
>
> Hi SEUU,
>
> My first thoughts on the subject go something like this:
>
> "More teams=more competition"
>
> Crucially, this will increase the amount of local competition for new
> teams
> (who might otherwise have to struggle to convince newer players to
> travel),
> which can only be a good thing.
>
> I can't really see any downsides to the expansion of ladder league, but I
> haven't had any second thoughts really.
>
> Enjoy the sunshine,
>
> Manny
> dD and Flump #31
>
> >From: Felix <felix37@gmail. com>
> >To: "seuniultimate@ yahoogroups. com" <seuniultimate@ yahoogroups. com>
> >Subject: [seuniultimate] Ladder League's future
> >Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:43:52 +0100
> >
> >Hi folks,
> >
> >There is talk currently going on about the possibility of allowing
> >club teams (non-university) to compete in regional Ladder Leagues
> >alongside university teams - in other words, incorporating them into
> >SEULL instead of creating a separate Open Ladder League from scratch.
> >
> >As the university players with the most Ladder League experience, what
> >are your initial thoughts about this?
> >
> >Felix
>
>
>
>
>
>
New Message Search

Find the message you want faster. Visit your group to try out the improved message search.

SPONSORED LINKS
Need to Reply?

Click one of the "Reply" links to respond to a specific message in the Daily Digest.

Create New Topic | Visit Your Group on the Web



Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:32 am

mrose15784
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #379 of 642 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hi folks, There is talk currently going on about the possibility of allowing club teams (non-university) to compete in regional Ladder Leagues alongside...
Felix
felixshardlow
Offline Send Email
Jul 17, 2006
1:49 pm

Hi SEUU, My first thoughts on the subject go something like this: "More teams=more competition" Crucially, this will increase the amount of local competition...
Emmanuel Bennett
ultimatemann...
Offline Send Email
Jul 18, 2006
12:19 pm

Thort i mite as well put my 2 cents in. Fraid they aint as positive as manny was. With most open teams playing in the high standard open tours and london...
David Gate
d_p_gate1985
Offline Send Email
Jul 18, 2006
7:58 pm

I'm agreeing with some of Shimmy's points I think. I think that if more teams were encorporated then it could make a weekend/weekday divide. Personally I...
Jim Loader
jim_ldr
Offline Send Email
Jul 19, 2006
1:20 am

Allowing for open team inclusion should create greater diversity in the league, and give those uni's seperated by distance some incentive to play their local...
Gemma Taylor
gembily
Offline Send Email
Jul 19, 2006
1:59 am

Hey all, great to see the discussion kicking off, please keep it up and if you have anything to add to anyones points or disagree with what's being said then...
Felix
felixshardlow
Offline Send Email
Jul 19, 2006
10:41 am

For what it's worth I agree with Shim. I don't think there would be much of an uptake from open teams to play in ladder league with the well established LWL...
Matt Gorham
erol_the_ham...
Offline Send Email
Jul 19, 2006
12:52 pm

Just my two cents... as a UCL player who perhaps play more open ultimate than most Uni teams, it doesn't make much sense to me to allow open teams to play in...
M Rose
mrose15784
Offline Send Email
Jul 19, 2006
12:04 pm

... The LL concentrates on the Autumn and Spring terms, when all the open teams have are four LWL events. The LWL is changing rapidly and will soon limit...
Felix
felixshardlow
Offline Send Email
Jul 19, 2006
10:01 pm

I agree that there may be too much pressure on uni teams to play both weekends and weekdays but surely the only way to find out who is hardcore enough to take...
Paul Hearmon
peewee4500
Offline Send Email
Jul 19, 2006
2:17 pm

I would say that's a better idea, having different tables. There are a few things I'd like to clear up about the current rules though if this does take effect:...
li51jp@...
pughpughbarn...
Offline Send Email
Aug 2, 2006
3:29 pm

Hey Pugh thanks for your well thought out comments. 1. Yep I've been considering this, but it is still a fact that plenty of uni teams have a non-university...
Felix
felixshardlow
Offline Send Email
Aug 2, 2006
5:02 pm

Can we not just have uni and open seperate? this way uni teams can still play open if they choose to. This might result in alot of the better uni first teams...
Ben Munday
bencmunday
Offline Send Email
Aug 2, 2006
7:15 pm

... First off, although looking to the future of ladder league is incredible and something we'll need to do before another region overtakes us for coolness, ...
tequila Wight
tequila.o@...
Send Email
Aug 8, 2006
9:02 pm

Hey folks, Some of you have been keeping up with my various announcements on Britdisc and UniUltimate (for those who haven't and are curious, I've pasted a...
Felix
felixshardlow
Offline Send Email
Aug 31, 2006
3:05 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help