Arrghh!

fourth! :(

3rd wouldnt have been so bad as the big man would have been nice. Now
we get none of the big three :/

Akaz









--- In rappak@yahoogroups.com, freewheel_99 <no_reply@y...> wrote:
> First of all I haven't let 6th enter my mind. For that to happen
both
> Cleveland and Denver would also be out of the top three. That just
> cannot happen. The draft is based on the sole idea of letting the
bad
> teams get the top young players. There would be an inquiry into the
> process if it went so badly.
>
> So I am only focused on the top 5. At 4th or 5th, big is the only
way
> to go. Bosh needs to be worked out to find out his talent level. If
> he isn't a top talent, then I'm inclined to take Kaman because
maybe
> we could finaly have a center and forget about that in future
drafts.
> Lampe strikes me as too skinny and maybe not a banger.
>
> Of course the main problem is that I haven't seen any of the top
> prospects play except Anthony. To be honest Anthony didn't strike
me
> as a world beater. I thought he looked soft, but I did like his
> skills.
>
> My brother says we'll get 2nd and I say we'll get 4th. He's a lot
> better at predicting than I am though. ;)
>
> --- In rappak@yahoogroups.com, "rappak" <rappak@y...> wrote:
> > > If we land outside top 5, well....
> >
> > Uh, that should read top 4.
> >
> > The top 4 being James, Milicic, Anthony, and Bosh. Outside this
> four
> > you get into "project" territory of bigmen with less potential
> > (Kaman, Lampe) and small but servicable players (Ford, Wade).
> >
> > It won't be so bad if we pick 5th or 6th. At the very least we'll
> get
> > some frontcourt help.
> >
> > lineup#1
> > Kaman
> > Davis
> > Murray
> > Carter
> > Alvin
> >
> > lineup#2
> > Davis
> > Lampe
> > Murray
> > Carter
> > Alvin