Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

patriotzip · Zip's New England Patriots Fan Group

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 15581 - 15610 of 20283   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Show Message Summaries Sort by Date ^  
#15581 From: "George" <patswingr@...>
Date: Sun Sep 6, 2009 12:05 pm
Subject: RE: Crable and Taylor IR'd
patswingr
Send Email Send Email
 
Maybe this is why BB has historically shown a dislike for drafting LBs. :-)

George

 


From: patriotzip@yahoogroups.com [mailto:patriotzip@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Machado.Nicholas
Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 1:31 PM
To: patriotzip@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [patriotzip] Crable and Taylor IR'd

 

Crable has certainly had plenty of time to memorize the playbook. First McKenzie and now Crable again.

On the bright side one of those IR's gives Ninkovich a shot. I thought he looked pretty good in training camp.

Harry


At 12:55 PM 9/6/2009 +0700, you wrote:



Crable may be eligible for Social Security by the time he gets on the field! What a disappointment he's been.



________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work instead of living on public assistance." Cicero - 55 BC


#15582 From: "George" <patswingr@...>
Date: Sun Sep 6, 2009 3:23 pm
Subject: Seymour GONE!
patswingr
Send Email Send Email
 

OK, I have to say that I am totally stunned by this trade, for the following reasons:

1. Most, including me, have said that our D is going to take a few weeks to gel, with all the new players coming in. Now, we've lost one of the lynchpins to that D.

2. It appears that we are moving to more 4-3 sets, largely due to a thin LB corps. Seymour's departure significantly weakens the DL corps, which, it would seem, should be kept as strong and deep as possible in a 4-3 defense.

As always, I add the caveat that BB has proven that he knows what he's doing; and I am, regardless of how closely I follow the team, no more than a fan, and, by definition, relatively uniformed of the big picture within the team.

That said, I have my fingers crossed on this one. The potential for serious problems on the defense looms large, in my view.

George

 

#15583 From: "frankdanabrewster" <frank.dana@...>
Date: Sun Sep 6, 2009 3:24 pm
Subject: Seymour traded!
frankdanabre...
Send Email Send Email
 
Adam Schefter confirms, Richard Seymour traded to Oakland for 1sr rounder in
2011!

Shocker!

fdb

#15584 From: "George" <patswingr@...>
Date: Sun Sep 6, 2009 3:34 pm
Subject: RE: Seymour traded!
patswingr
Send Email Send Email
 
And another Patriots jersey becomes a collectors item! Just a replica though. Bruschi is the only "official" jersey I own. Too damn hot here to wear that one! :-)

George

 


From: patriotzip@yahoogroups.com [mailto:patriotzip@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of frankdanabrewster
Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 10:25 PM
To: patriotzip@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [patriotzip] Seymour traded!

 

Adam Schefter confirms, Richard Seymour traded to Oakland for 1sr rounder in 2011!

Shocker!

fdb


#15585 From: "frankdanabrewster" <frank.dana@...>
Date: Sun Sep 6, 2009 3:36 pm
Subject: Re: Seymour traded!
frankdanabre...
Send Email Send Email
 
Could this help pave the way for resigning Wilfork? They were both due.

fdb

--- In patriotzip@yahoogroups.com, "George" <patswingr@...> wrote:
>
> And another Patriots jersey becomes a collectors item! Just a replica
> though. Bruschi is the only "official" jersey I own. Too damn hot here to
> wear that one! :-)
> George
>
>
>
>   _____
>
> From: patriotzip@yahoogroups.com [mailto:patriotzip@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of frankdanabrewster
> Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 10:25 PM
> To: patriotzip@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [patriotzip] Seymour traded!
>
>
>
>
> Adam Schefter confirms, Richard Seymour traded to Oakland for 1sr rounder in
> 2011!
>
> Shocker!
>
> fdb
>

#15586 From: "Machado.Nicholas" <machado.nicholas@...>
Date: Sun Sep 6, 2009 3:43 pm
Subject: Re: Seymour traded!
machado.nicholas@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Wow! Not only did they trade him but they sent him to NFL purgatory. RS may not be a happy camper this morning.

Harry


At 03:24 PM 9/6/2009 +0000, you wrote:
 

Adam Schefter confirms, Richard Seymour traded to Oakland for 1sr rounder in 2011!

Shocker!



________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work instead of living on public assistance." Cicero - 55 BC

#15587 From: "Machado.Nicholas" <machado.nicholas@...>
Date: Sun Sep 6, 2009 3:45 pm
Subject: Re: Seymour GONE!
machado.nicholas@...
Send Email Send Email
 
This is totally unexpected but there are many new faces in camp and around the league and plenty I don't know so I will defer to my number one rule with the Pats; In Bill I Trust.

Harry


At 10:23 PM 9/6/2009 +0700, you wrote:
 

OK, I have to say that I am totally stunned by this trade, for the following reasons:

1. Most, including me, have said that our D is going to take a few weeks to gel, with all the new players coming in. Now, we've lost one of the lynchpins to that D.

2. It appears that we are moving to more 4-3 sets, largely due to a thin LB corps. Seymour's departure significantly weakens the DL corps, which, it would seem, should be kept as strong and deep as possible in a 4-3 defense.

As always, I add the caveat that BB has proven that he knows what he's doing; and I am, regardless of how closely I follow the team, no more than a fan, and, by definition, relatively uniformed of the big picture within the team.

That said, I have my fingers crossed on this one. The potential for serious problems on the defense looms large, in my view.


________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work instead of living on public assistance." Cicero - 55 BC

#15588 From: "frankdanabrewster" <frank.dana@...>
Date: Sun Sep 6, 2009 3:57 pm
Subject: Re: Seymour GONE!
frankdanabre...
Send Email Send Email
 
It's been fun reading the comments on the sports sites on this deal. Al Davis is
getting skewered! Most people seem to think it's a coup for the Pats. I'll miss
Seymour. He's been great. But I also like the deal.

My favorite one line comment...

"This wouldn't have happened if Al Davis was still alive."

fdb

#15589 From: "Machado.Nicholas" <machado.nicholas@...>
Date: Sun Sep 6, 2009 3:59 pm
Subject: Re: Re: Seymour traded!
machado.nicholas@...
Send Email Send Email
 
I have no doubt this trade got Wilfork's attention. The idea of playing in Oakland for the next few years might soften his trade stance but I don't think the Pats did it because they wanted to influence Wilfork. And I don't think this move was so the Pats can give Wilfork the store especially given the emergence of Ron Brace in camp and the success the Pats have had giving out big contracts. Since Seymour got his he's spent a lot of time injured as has Adalius Thomas.

Harry


At 03:36 PM 9/6/2009 +0000, you wrote:
 

Could this help pave the way for resigning Wilfork? They were both due.


________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work instead of living on public assistance." Cicero - 55 BC

#15590 From: Mark Morse <packy001@...>
Date: Sun Sep 6, 2009 4:03 pm
Subject: Re: seymour to Raiders for 20011 1st round pick
packy001
Send Email Send Email
 
I'm not surprised!  All the D Lineman are similar, they stop the run.  The Pats
couldn't pay both Seymour and Wilfork.  Seymour has been mediocre the last few
years and has been battling injuries with his age.

They are going to more of a 4-3 look and they will have Banta-Cain and Burgess
on the DE with Pryor, Warren, Green, Wilfork on the inside.

I think its a great trade.

Mark


--- On Sun, 9/6/09, Jacob W. Michaels <wicked@...> wrote:

> From: Jacob W. Michaels <wicked@...>
> Subject: Re: seymour to Raiders for 20011 1st round pick
> To:
> Cc: patriots@...
> Date: Sunday, September 6, 2009, 11:00 AM
> Wow. Just wow. I don't even know what
> to say. Seymour's been a key part
> of this team the past decade. He's worth a first-rounder,
> but who knows
> if the Raiders will be any good that far down the line.
> It's easy to say
> no, but you never know. Kind of frustrating that we won't
> get more
> return on him sooner. It really feels like we're kind of
> panicking over
> this uncapped year. I hope we get Wilfork done.
>
> So wonder who'll our second DE be? Green, I'd guess, but
> maybe Brace?
>
> Jacob     Stunned ... no Bruschi or
> Seymour.
>
>
> Jason Uechi wrote:
> > amazing.
> > who saw that coming?
> > _______________________________________________
> > patriots mailing list
> > patriots@...
> > http://lists.bosco.net/mailman/listinfo/patriots
> >
> >
> >   
>
> _______________________________________________
> patriots mailing list
> patriots@...
> http://lists.bosco.net/mailman/listinfo/patriots
>

#15591 From: "Machado.Nicholas" <machado.nicholas@...>
Date: Sun Sep 6, 2009 4:05 pm
Subject: RE: Crable and Taylor IR'd
machado.nicholas@...
Send Email Send Email
 
And trading for them - Monty Beisel comes to mind.

Harry


At 07:05 PM 9/6/2009 +0700, you wrote:
 

Maybe this is why BB has historically shown a dislike for drafting LBs. :-)


________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work instead of living on public assistance." Cicero - 55 BC

#15592 From: kmacalp@...
Date: Sun Sep 6, 2009 1:38 pm
Subject: Seymour Traded
kmacalp
Send Email Send Email
 
I heard this about an hour ago. My first reaction was, "WHAAAT?"
 
Is Al Davis insane? A 1st rounder for a guy with one year left on his contract and entering the latter stages of his career?
 
What are we going to do though? The pick isn't until 2011. Who takes Seymour's place right now? The back up defensive line players look good, but I suddenly don't feel as good as I did about the D-line going into this year. If we go to a 4-3, will one of those younger DTs step in with Burgess lining up at DE? What if we stay 3-4? Jarvis Green has done well filling in over the years. How would he hold up full time?
 
Wow! What next?
 
Hey! The Eagles released Feeley, so if the Pats want him, they won't have to trade.
 
Sincerely,
 
Scott Sheaffer 

#15593 From: Steve Basile <avatar@...>
Date: Sun Sep 6, 2009 5:52 pm
Subject: Re: Seymour Traded
austin_fella
Send Email Send Email
 
I cringed at first, because I hate to lose Big Sey in a year when our D has not looked great in pre-season, and is pretty young, but then I realized two things:
(1) In Bill I Trust and
(2) it's a RAIDERS pick, so that means like #1 or 2 overall right?  :-)

Vaya con Dios Seymour--you were a great Patriot.

Go Pats,
 Baze
--
Steve Basile
Manager
B.D. Riley's Irish Pub
Austin, TX
Official Home: Austin Patriots Club
Web: www.bdrileys.com






On 9/6/09 12:38 PM, "kmacalp@..." <kmacalp@...> wrote:


 
 

I heard this about an hour ago. My first reaction was, "WHAAAT?"
 
Is Al Davis insane? A 1st rounder for a guy with one year left on his contract and entering the latter stages of his career?
 
What are we going to do though? The pick isn't until 2011. Who takes Seymour's place right now? The back up defensive line players look good, but I suddenly don't feel as good as I did about the D-line going into this year. If we go to a 4-3, will one of those younger DTs step in with Burgess lining up at DE? What if we stay 3-4? Jarvis Green has done well filling in over the years. How would he hold up full time?
 
Wow! What next?
 
Hey! The Eagles released Feeley, so if the Pats want him, they won't have to trade.
 
Sincerely,
 
Scott Sheaffer

 

 
    



#15594 From: Mark Morse <packy001@...>
Date: Sun Sep 6, 2009 10:41 pm
Subject: Isaiah Stanback signed to PS
packy001
Send Email Send Email
 
Former 3rd year WR/QB signed to PS.  Patriots want to convert him back to QB. 
6'2" 210.


Mark

#15595 From: Mark Morse <packy001@...>
Date: Sun Sep 6, 2009 10:42 pm
Subject: Stanback signing per KFFL
packy001
Send Email Send Email
 
Forgot to list the source.  NFL Network (LaConfora) is also reporting
Mark

#15596 From: "ps2dad" <ps2dad@...>
Date: Sun Sep 6, 2009 10:53 pm
Subject: Re: Seymour Traded
ps2dad
Send Email Send Email
 
Let's not forget how often Seymour is injured.  Has he ever played a full
season?  Wait - has ANYONE ever played a full season?  This is why players get
traded when they are still seemingly viable to their team.  Savvy owners and
smart coaches realize the shelf life of these high-profile men, due to double
teaming and the like.  Feeley has been released by the Eagles, so if BB wants
him, he could get him.

On a separate note, please refrain from political dogma and other anti-American
bull#$%!.  This is not a political blog, it is for Patriots fans who want to
talk Patriots football.  This includes using quotes from empires that failed
over two thousand years ago.

#15597 From: patfan1@...
Date: Sun Sep 6, 2009 11:45 pm
Subject: Re: Re: Seymour Traded
patfan1
Send Email Send Email
 
What's the quote about an empire that failed thousands of years ago?

Still surprised that Seymour was traded...
Monty
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: "ps2dad" <ps2dad@...>

Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 22:53:52
To: <patriotzip@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [patriotzip] Re: Seymour Traded


Let's not forget how often Seymour is injured.  Has he ever played a full
season?  Wait - has ANYONE ever played a full season?  This is why players get
traded when they are still seemingly viable to their team.  Savvy owners and
smart coaches realize the shelf life of these high-profile men, due to double
teaming and the like.  Feeley has been released by the Eagles, so if BB wants
him, he could get him.

On a separate note, please refrain from political dogma and other anti-American
bull#$%!.  This is not a political blog, it is for Patriots fans who want to
talk Patriots football.  This includes using quotes from empires that failed
over two thousand years ago.



------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from Zip's New England Patriots Fan Group, send an email to:
patriotzip-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Yahoo! Groups Links

#15598 From: Ed Bryant <edbryant36@...>
Date: Mon Sep 7, 2009 12:30 am
Subject: Re: Re: seymour to Raiders for 20011 1st round pick
edbryant36
Send Email Send Email
 
My main reaction to all the Wilfork stuff is that they really couldn't do Wilfork or Seymour or Mankins for that matter without the other two noticing.

Because of the position he plays, I had come down wanting to keep Wilfork over Seymour if we could only sign one.  I will not, however, badmouth Seymour in any way.

No Rodney, no Big Sey, no Vrabel, no Junior, no 54?  Yikes!  It's time to make a list of all the players on our team who are 0 for 1 in Super Bowls.



--- On Sun, 9/6/09, Mark Morse <packy001@...> wrote:

From: Mark Morse <packy001@...>
Subject: [patriotzip] Re: seymour to Raiders for 20011 1st round pick
To: "Patriot List" <patriots@...>, "Zip List" <patriotzip@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sunday, September 6, 2009, 12:03 PM

 

I'm not surprised! All the D Lineman are similar, they stop the run. The Pats couldn't pay both Seymour and Wilfork. Seymour has been mediocre the last few years and has been battling injuries with his age.

They are going to more of a 4-3 look and they will have Banta-Cain and Burgess on the DE with Pryor, Warren, Green, Wilfork on the inside.

I think its a great trade.

Mark

--- On Sun, 9/6/09, Jacob W. Michaels <wicked@...> wrote:

> From: Jacob W. Michaels <wicked@...>
> Subject: Re: seymour to Raiders for 20011 1st round pick
> To:
> Cc: patriots@bosco. net
> Date: Sunday, September 6, 2009, 11:00 AM
> Wow. Just wow. I don't even know what
> to say. Seymour's been a key part
> of this team the past decade. He's worth a first-rounder,
> but who knows
> if the Raiders will be any good that far down the line.
> It's easy to say
> no, but you never know. Kind of frustrating that we won't
> get more
> return on him sooner. It really feels like we're kind of
> panicking over
> this uncapped year. I hope we get Wilfork done.
>
> So wonder who'll our second DE be? Green, I'd guess, but
> maybe Brace?
>
> Jacob     Stunned ... no Bruschi or
> Seymour.
>
>
> Jason Uechi wrote:
> > amazing.
> > who saw that coming?
> > ____________ _________ _________ _________ ________
> > patriots mailing list
> > patriots@bosco. net
> > http://lists. bosco.net/ mailman/listinfo /patriots
> >
> >
> >   
>
> ____________ _________ _________ _________ ________
> patriots mailing list
> patriots@bosco. net
> http://lists. bosco.net/ mailman/listinfo /patriots
>


#15599 From: Rich Carreiro <rlcarr@...>
Date: Mon Sep 7, 2009 12:47 am
Subject: Feelings on Seymour trade -- not exactly liking it
Rich_Carr
Send Email Send Email
 
I'll start by saying that this trade is only acceptable to me (as
if BB cares about that :) if they re-sign Wilfork.  If they don't
this is really bad.

Assuming they re-sign Wilfork, I'm torn.

On the one hand it does look like longer-term it's a good move
for the team.  They weren't going to re-sign both Seymour and Wilfork
and I (and I bet they) prefer to re-sign Wilfork.  That means Seymour
was walking at the end of the season.  This way they get something (and
not something trivial) for someone they were going to lose for nothing
at the end of the season.

But on the other hand, I'm more short-term focussed and this definitely
hurts their chances of winning it all this season and next.  Brady's
already had one year of his career wasted (last year) though that wasn't
anyone's fault.  In 2006 I think they could have gone all the way if they
had better WRs for Brady.  Yes, they made it to the AFC Championship, and
yes, the flu didn't help, but with better WRs, maybe that game is in
Foxboro, or maybe the Pats have the 1st round bye and who knows.  Brady's
not getting any younger, and neither is Moss.  And the odds are good
another year of Brady and Moss's careers get wasted in 2011 because of
the lockout everyone expects.

It's hard to argue with looking longer-term, but darn it, I'd really
like for them to be as good as they can be in 2009 and 2010, and it's
not looking that that'll be the case.  Obviously, I hope I'm wrong.

--
Rich Carreiro                            rlcarr@...

#15600 From: "frankdanabrewster" <frank.dana@...>
Date: Mon Sep 7, 2009 12:51 am
Subject: Re: Stanback signing per KFFL
frankdanabre...
Send Email Send Email
 
Nunn also cleared waivers (surprisingly), and was signed to the PS.

fdb

--- In patriotzip@yahoogroups.com, Mark Morse <packy001@...> wrote:
>
> Forgot to list the source.  NFL Network (LaConfora) is also reporting
> Mark
>

#15601 From: "George" <patswingr@...>
Date: Mon Sep 7, 2009 1:58 am
Subject: Seymour versus Antwine
patswingr
Send Email Send Email
 

A friend who knows that I saw both play asked which I thought was better, Richard Seymour or Houston Antwine. Here's my answer to him.

 

Seymour certainly was the more physically talented of the two. Houston Antwine was "small", by today's standards. He was 6'1", 270; compared to Seymour's 6'6", 310! And Seymour, despite his size, is quick as a cat; as was Antwine.

It's always difficult to compare players from significantly different eras on a "man-to-man" basis. Nearly all of today's athletes are bigger, stronger, and faster than those from the 60's, when Antwine played. I seriously doubt that Antwine would have as much success trying to play DT for an NFL team today. However, it is reasonable to compare their performance relative to their peers. In the latter comparison, Antwine fairs much better than he does in the former.

Houston Antwine was a seven-time All Star with the Patriots in the AFL. Like Seymour, he was constantly double-teamed, because he could rarely be controlled by any single offensive lineman. He did not, however, have the level of pass rushing skills that Seymour had.

Overall, relative to their eras, and "pound for pound", I'd still give a slight edge to Seymour. But it really would be only because of his superior pass rushing ability (including the ability to knock down passes from "way up there"). Both had great careers as superior, All Pro quality, defensive lineman for our Patriots!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Any opinions from other old geezers out there? :-)

George

 

#15602 From: "George" <patswingr@...>
Date: Mon Sep 7, 2009 2:03 am
Subject: RE: Seymour Traded
patswingr
Send Email Send Email
 
I have two concerns about the return for Seymour, Steve.
 
1. Davis could die before we get to a 2011 draft pick, and, as a result, the Raidahs could significantly improve; thereby dropping our pick way down.
 
2. I could die before we get to a 2011 draft pick, and, as a result, I'd never know what we got for one of the best Patriots players of all time! :-)

George

 


From: patriotzip@yahoogroups.com [mailto:patriotzip@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Steve Basile
Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 12:52 AM
To: patriotzip@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [patriotzip] Seymour Traded

 

I cringed at first, because I hate to lose Big Sey in a year when our D has not looked great in pre-season, and is pretty young, but then I realized two things:
(1) In Bill I Trust and
(2) it's a RAIDERS pick, so that means like #1 or 2 overall right?  :-)

Vaya con Dios Seymour--you were a great Patriot.

Go Pats,
 Baze
--
Steve Basile
Manager
B.D. Riley's Irish Pub
Austin, TX
Official Home: Austin Patriots Club
Web: www.bdrileys.com






On 9/6/09 12:38 PM, "kmacalp@aol.com" <kmacalp@aol.com> wrote:


 
 

I heard this about an hour ago. My first reaction was, "WHAAAT?"
 
Is Al Davis insane? A 1st rounder for a guy with one year left on his contract and entering the latter stages of his career?
 
What are we going to do though? The pick isn't until 2011. Who takes Seymour's place right now? The back up defensive line players look good, but I suddenly don't feel as good as I did about the D-line going into this year. If we go to a 4-3, will one of those younger DTs step in with Burgess lining up at DE? What if we stay 3-4? Jarvis Green has done well filling in over the years. How would he hold up full time?
 
Wow! What next?
 
Hey! The Eagles released Feeley, so if the Pats want him, they won't have to trade.
 
Sincerely,
 
Scott Sheaffer

 

 
    



#15603 From: Mark Morse <packy001@...>
Date: Mon Sep 7, 2009 3:07 am
Subject: Re: Feelings on Seymour trade -- not exactly liking it
packy001
Send Email Send Email
 
I like the trade alot.
 
 Don't get me wrong, I think Richard Seymour is a tremendous player, but he is not the difference maker he once was.  The way the Defense is set up in the 3-4, the three d-lineman eat up space.  The 7 D-lineman on this roster are DTs.  Seymour may have been called a DE for the Pro Bowl balloting, but he was really a DT.  If they truly want to go to a 4-3, you will only use two interior DTs.  Burgess, Banta-Cain or Ninkovich will be the DEs.  Pryor or Green will adequately fill the hole left by Seymour.  They don't have the pass rush abilities of Seymour, and may never be as good, but the drop off should not be significant.  Seymour will be 30 in a month.  He has been slowed by injuries and is not the player he once was.  The team was not going to pay both Seymour and Wilfork.  They chose Wilfork.  I too am assuming they are going to get a deal done with Wilfork.
 
Getting a 2011 #1 pick for a perennial loser like Oakland is a steal.  You are getting something significant for the player now.  He would have walked at the end of the year and they would get nothing.  Additionally, 2011 should be under the new agreement, and the owners want a rookie salary cap (with more money going to established players). 
 
  

Mark

--- On Sun, 9/6/09, Rich Carreiro <rlcarr@...> wrote:

From: Rich Carreiro <rlcarr@...>
Subject: [patriotzip] Feelings on Seymour trade -- not exactly liking it
To: "Bosco Pats List" <patriots@...>, "Zip Patriots List" <patriotzip@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sunday, September 6, 2009, 8:47 PM

 
I'll start by saying that this trade is only acceptable to me (as
if BB cares about that :) if they re-sign Wilfork. If they don't
this is really bad.

Assuming they re-sign Wilfork, I'm torn.

On the one hand it does look like longer-term it's a good move
for the team. They weren't going to re-sign both Seymour and Wilfork
and I (and I bet they) prefer to re-sign Wilfork. That means Seymour
was walking at the end of the season. This way they get something (and
not something trivial) for someone they were going to lose for nothing
at the end of the season.

But on the other hand, I'm more short-term focussed and this definitely
hurts their chances of winning it all this season and next. Brady's
already had one year of his career wasted (last year) though that wasn't
anyone's fault. In 2006 I think they could have gone all the way if they
had better WRs for Brady. Yes, they made it to the AFC Championship, and
yes, the flu didn't help, but with better WRs, maybe that game is in
Foxboro, or maybe the Pats have the 1st round bye and who knows. Brady's
not getting any younger, and neither is Moss. And the odds are good
another year of Brady and Moss's careers get wasted in 2011 because of
the lockout everyone expects.

It's hard to argue with looking longer-term, but darn it, I'd really
like for them to be as good as they can be in 2009 and 2010, and it's
not looking that that'll be the case. Obviously, I hope I'm wrong.

--
Rich Carreiro rlcarr@rlcarr. com



#15604 From: "George" <patswingr@...>
Date: Sun Sep 6, 2009 5:59 am
Subject: RE: [SPAM] releases for the day so far
patswingr
Send Email Send Email
 
I agree, Harry. Britt and O'Callaghan seemed like fairly sure bets for OL depth. That, however, is good news, IMO. Neither of them impressed me much; and the cuts mean that BB and Scar must see more potential in a couple of the young guys than they've seen in Britt and O'Callaghan. As always, "IBWT".

George

 


From: patriotzip@yahoogroups.com [mailto:patriotzip@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Machado.Nicholas
Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 6:28 AM
To: patriotzip@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [SPAM][patriotzip] releases for the day so far

 

DL Titus Adams
OL Wesley Britt
CB Herana-Daze Jones
LB Paris Lenon
CB Jamar Love
WR Terrence Nunn
OL Ryan O'Callaghan
DL Darryl Richard
TE Alex Smith
S/WR Ray Ventrone

Didn't expect to see Britt or O'Callaghan on the list.

Harry

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work instead of living on public assistance." Cicero - 55 BC


#15605 From: "George" <patswingr@...>
Date: Mon Sep 7, 2009 3:30 am
Subject: RE: Feelings on Seymour trade -- not exactly liking it
patswingr
Send Email Send Email
 
I think you're overlooking a very important guy in your analysis, Mark. I see the #1 line now as DEs Green and Warren; DTs Brace and Wilfork. I believe that Burgess (due to age), and TBC (because of lack of run stopping ability) will truly be situational. Ninkovich and Pryor will, IMO, both be true backups, coming in to give a breather to the starters.
 
Whatever the case, I feel certain that we will be less strong (though not "weak") in the DL this season than we would have been with Big Sey in there. However, the long term, which is always in clear view for BB, did call for such a move now. We know the contract situation with Wilfork, Seymour, Green, and Mankins looming. We know that Seymour's recent injury history has not been good, and is not likely to get better as he ages. (Too many double teams every season.) So I can't argue with the logic of it. But I remain concerned about the impact in 2009. 
 
And, of course, I will miss those many crushing plays by Big Sey; who, by the way, was just about the only player I guessed right on back in the day when I used to make predictions about our R1 picks! :-)
 
Thanks, Big Sey! Nothing but the best for you - even though you're now a member of the hated Raidahs!

George

 
 


From: patriotzip@yahoogroups.com [mailto:patriotzip@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark Morse
Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 10:08 AM
To: patriotzip@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [patriotzip] Feelings on Seymour trade -- not exactly liking it

 

I like the trade alot.
 
 Don't get me wrong, I think Richard Seymour is a tremendous player, but he is not the difference maker he once was.  The way the Defense is set up in the 3-4, the three d-lineman eat up space.  The 7 D-lineman on this roster are DTs.  Seymour may have been called a DE for the Pro Bowl balloting, but he was really a DT.  If they truly want to go to a 4-3, you will only use two interior DTs.  Burgess, Banta-Cain or Ninkovich will be the DEs.  Pryor or Green will adequately fill the hole left by Seymour.  They don't have the pass rush abilities of Seymour, and may never be as good, but the drop off should not be significant.  Seymour will be 30 in a month.  He has been slowed by injuries and is not the player he once was.  The team was not going to pay both Seymour and Wilfork.  They chose Wilfork.  I too am assuming they are going to get a deal done with Wilfork.
 
Getting a 2011 #1 pick for a perennial loser like Oakland is a steal.  You are getting something significant for the player now.  He would have walked at the end of the year and they would get nothing.  Additionally, 2011 should be under the new agreement, and the owners want a rookie salary cap (with more money going to established players). 
 
  

Mark

--- On Sun, 9/6/09, Rich Carreiro <rlcarr@rlcarr.com> wrote:

From: Rich Carreiro <rlcarr@rlcarr.com>
Subject: [patriotzip] Feelings on Seymour trade -- not exactly liking it
To: "Bosco Pats List" <patriots@bosco.net>, "Zip Patriots List" <patriotzip@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sunday, September 6, 2009, 8:47 PM

 
I'll start by saying that this trade is only acceptable to me (as
if BB cares about that :) if they re-sign Wilfork. If they don't
this is really bad.

Assuming they re-sign Wilfork, I'm torn.

On the one hand it does look like longer-term it's a good move
for the team. They weren't going to re-sign both Seymour and Wilfork
and I (and I bet they) prefer to re-sign Wilfork. That means Seymour
was walking at the end of the season. This way they get something (and
not something trivial) for someone they were going to lose for nothing
at the end of the season.

But on the other hand, I'm more short-term focussed and this definitely
hurts their chances of winning it all this season and next. Brady's
already had one year of his career wasted (last year) though that wasn't
anyone's fault. In 2006 I think they could have gone all the way if they
had better WRs for Brady. Yes, they made it to the AFC Championship, and
yes, the flu didn't help, but with better WRs, maybe that game is in
Foxboro, or maybe the Pats have the 1st round bye and who knows. Brady's
not getting any younger, and neither is Moss. And the odds are good
another year of Brady and Moss's careers get wasted in 2011 because of
the lockout everyone expects.

It's hard to argue with looking longer-term, but darn it, I'd really
like for them to be as good as they can be in 2009 and 2010, and it's
not looking that that'll be the case. Obviously, I hope I'm wrong.

--
Rich Carreiro rlcarr@rlcarr. com



#15606 From: "George" <patswingr@...>
Date: Mon Sep 7, 2009 4:07 am
Subject: OT Help?
patswingr
Send Email Send Email
 

I see that OT Levi Jones was cut. As thin (in numbers, that is!) as the Pats are at that position, it might be nice to add him as a backup, replacing one of the many interior OL guys they have.

George

 

#15607 From: "George" <patswingr@...>
Date: Mon Sep 7, 2009 4:15 am
Subject: Jets At It Again
patswingr
Send Email Send Email
 

Doesn't matter who coaches the Jets; it seems that the "behind the back" moves are a "tradition" for that franchise.

I'm sure most of you saw that the Jets traded with the Lions to get Kevin O'Connell. I found this comment at the end of an article by the Globe's Gasper:

"It's possible that Rex Ryan is looking for an edge by bringing in O'Connell to get information on the Patriots, who play the Jets at the Meadowlands on Sept. 20."

POSSIBLE? Yeah, Chris, it's "POSSIBLE". It's also "POSSIBLE" that Bill Belichick is less than totally forthright when discussing injuries to his players!

George

 

#15608 From: Kevin Morgan <ps2dad@...>
Date: Mon Sep 7, 2009 4:30 am
Subject: Re: Re: Seymour Traded
ps2dad
Send Email Send Email
 
Monty, the quote I refer to is at the bottom of another post, by Machado, Nicholas.  He quotes Cicero in 55 BC.  That is allI want to say about it, it isn't important, really.  Let's stick to the team topics.  
 
Anything can happen, to Anyone, at Anytime.



From: "patfan1@..." <patfan1@...>
To: patriotzip@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, September 6, 2009 7:45:31 PM
Subject: Re: [patriotzip] Re: Seymour Traded

 

What's the quote about an empire that failed thousands of years ago?

Still surprised that Seymour was traded...
Monty
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: "ps2dad" <ps2dad@yahoo. com>

Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 22:53:52
To: <patriotzip@yahoogro ups.com>
Subject: [patriotzip] Re: Seymour Traded


Let's not forget how often Seymour is injured. Has he ever played a full season? Wait - has ANYONE ever played a full season? This is why players get traded when they are still seemingly viable to their team. Savvy owners and smart coaches realize the shelf life of these high-profile men, due to double teaming and the like. Feeley has been released by the Eagles, so if BB wants him, he could get him.

On a separate note, please refrain from political dogma and other anti-American bull#$%!. This is not a political blog, it is for Patriots fans who want to talk Patriots football. This includes using quotes from empires that failed over two thousand years ago.



------------ --------- --------- ------

To unsubscribe from Zip's New England Patriots Fan Group, send an email to:
patriotzip-unsubscr ibe@yahoogroups. com

Yahoo! Groups Links





#15609 From: Rich Carreiro <rlcarr@...>
Date: Mon Sep 7, 2009 5:25 am
Subject: Steve Burton - Bruschi to ESPN
Rich_Carr
Send Email Send Email
 
On "SportsFinal" tonight Steve Burton claimed Bruschi
is getting hired by ESPN.

--
Rich Carreiro                            rlcarr@...

#15610 From: Rich Carreiro <rlcarr@...>
Date: Mon Sep 7, 2009 5:30 am
Subject: Neat ESPN piece on how BB learned O
Rich_Carr
Send Email Send Email
 
Messages 15581 - 15610 of 20283   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help