Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
northstarleague · The Northstar League
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Keeper review   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #63 of 123 |
I propose we review the keeper legislation again this year, letting
all voices be heard. Some of this may be a rehash of previous
discussions, but I think a 5-year review is warranted.

One of the original dissenters was Rob Hall, who advocated that all
players be available every year. He became "victim" of the process
one year when he failed to declare them, and was assigned a trio of
keepers by the Triumvirate. There have been various strategies
involved, whether to keep superstars or prospects, etc.

After posting the dollar values for players, it's easy to see that
even the first round will be more lackluster again. Indeed, this
process has led, in part, to the picking of Josh Willingham as a
first rounder by yours truly (hey, I won that year, so shush!)

Also, the keeper years have been dominated by the Seabass and
Targeese, although both have had a lower finish during that time as
well.

Therefore, I make two proposals

1) Keepers be phased out starting this year. Keepers who have already
been signed will remain with their teams through the end of their
contracts.

or

2) The keeper process be blown up immediately, and all players are
made immediately available.

Continuing as is would be the default, so there is no need for a
proposal to continue as is.

These proposals are made to stimulate (hopefully not heated)
discussion on the keeper rules. I believe proposal 1 would be most
fair if we decide to abandon the keeper rules. However, if there is
widespread support for proposal 2, is there a reason we can't abandon
it as is?

You're free to post on the NSL Yahoo Group (there is a link on the
top of Northstarleague.com -
http://sports.groups.yahoo.com/group/northstarleague/) until the
Yahoo Fantasy Baseball goes live. Last year, this occurred on
February 16. I will do my best to ensure that our league number is on
the Eastern Seaboard (last year, we were 00936, which is actually San
Juan, PR).

Enjoy your scouting, gentlemen! We'll see you in 8 weeks!





Sun Feb 3, 2008 4:30 pm

targeese
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #63 of 123 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

I propose we review the keeper legislation again this year, letting all voices be heard. Some of this may be a rehash of previous discussions, but I think a...
Terry
targeese
Offline Send Email
Feb 3, 2008
4:30 pm

I just scratched off all of the keepers from the list, and was very disappointed with the "leftovers." Some thoughts to consider: ~From SN's Top 300 list: -17...
Ken
kendo1372
Offline Send Email
Feb 3, 2008
6:38 pm

It would not be fair to immediately eliminate keepers considering some of us made future draft pick trades under the assumption we would have our keepers to...
Mike and Kari Wayman
hiwaymen
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2008
3:41 am

I like keepers but my opinion is usually on the low end for being taken seriously cause everyone just thinks I am Terry's lacky. The only thing I ask is that...
azgosslings@...
quigon_2325
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2008
4:32 am

I absolutely forgot about draft pick trades. In this case, I would advocate phasing out keepers. I made a draft pick trade myself involving getting a keeper...
Ken
kendo1372
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2008
5:18 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help