yeah - the link...('course i sent it before i got your email) what was i
thinking? I thought i was up to date on every public web document at USAC
about cyclocross... i go a few days and a weekend without checking and i
get schooled.... like i probably will in N.E. cross....

On 5/2/06, Adam Myerson <adam@...> wrote:
>
> There is no cat 5. If you follow the link, it shows how you if you're a 4
> or
> a 5 on the road, you'll be a 4 to start in 'cross.
>
> And I plan to tackle the barriers the way I always have: at full speed,
> slightly out of control, dressed in spandex.
>
> Adam
>
>
> on 5/2/06 1:30 PM, GeWilli at gewilli@... wrote:
>
> > So its a 4 cat system? how does it fit within the 'tradditional' 5 cat
> > system...
> >
> > And maybe while we are playing 20 questions... how are the organizers
> going
> > to tackle the barrier rules? Is this gonna be like one of Patrick
> O'Grady's
> > cartoons from back in the day when barriers were so big and numerous in
> an
> > attempt to discourage those bunny hoppin mt. bikers?
> >
> > On 5/2/06, Tim Lucia <timlucia@...> wrote:
> >>
> >> http://www.usacycling.org/news/user/story.php?id=2221
> >>
> >> Not sure it explains it, per se. It does give categories, requirements
> >> for
> >> upgrading, etc. but nowhere does it map onto our well-known fall
> schedules
> >> and who can do what with which category.
> >>
> >> I would guess that
> >>
> >> C <==> 4
> >> B <==> 4/3
> >> A <==> 1/2/3
> >>
> >> M35 "A" <==> 1/2/3
> >>
> >> For women, drop the B row.
> >>
> >> Tim
> >>
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]