Just keep in mind such interference must be intentional or blatant and
avoidable. Otherwise every runner who has scored or put out would be
plunked along with the "Hey he interfered with my throw!!!"



_____

From: llumpires@yahoogroups.com [mailto:llumpires@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jerry McKissack
Sent: Sunday, July 05, 2009 7:39 PM
To: llumpires@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [llumpires] Re: Interference?








What about rule 7.09(e)

(e) Any batter or runner who has just been put out, or any runner who has
just scored, hinders or impedes any following play being made on a runner.
Such runner shall be declared out for the interference of his teammate;

Umpire's judgement - did he hinder or impede?

Jerry

-- In llumpires@yahoogrou <mailto:llumpires%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com,
Travis Brown <wmllump@...> wrote:
>
> He is an "authorized person" and must interfere intentionally for
> interference to be called. What you described was not intentional
> interference. Instead, he was trying to avoid interfering.
>
> Travis
>
> On Jul 5, 2009, at 5:10 PM, MichaelWmWalsh@... wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > After a runner scored, he set up on the 3rd base extended line to
> > direct a following runner to stay up or slide. The throw to F2 was
> > off-line and hit the runner who had scored. He was attempting to avoid
> > the throw but couldn't get out of the way. I had the plate and did not
> > consider it interference, but later my partner insisted that, unlike a
> > base coach, he had no right to be there and it would be interference
> > if
> > he affected the play. Well, if so, it would have to be dead
> > immediately, before seeing if the play was affected, but I cannot find
> > any support in the rules. What do you think? Thanks.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]