You folks are so wimpy :)...
Metcalf has NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE as a LKHC... where is your sense
of discovery?
As for OLH, the agony of it not being there this year just makes it
more enjoyable NEXT year...
Of course I really have no say in the matter as I now live in
Stamford, CT and will watch enviously from a afar how the series
plays out this year. Regardless of the 'menu of pain' you sickos
decide to inflict on yourselves, I'm certain it will live up to the
spirit of low-key.
First person to do a LIVE webcast of one of the climbs gets an
unlocked iPhone...
-KevW
--- In lkhc@yahoogroups.com, Steve Rosen <steve@...> wrote:
>
> I'd like to second Bill's thought - I didn't get to do the LKHC
series
> last year (I found out about it in December), but I was planning on
> trying it out this year. OLH is the classic benchmark here in the
> Bay Area...
>
> If there was some question about doing Metcalf for some reason,
> instead of doing a mountain bike event, how about replacing the
> Metcalf climb with OLH instead?
>
> Just me 2 cents...
>
> Oh, as an aside - to answer the question, I think B-O-B is still
> harder than Welch Creek - nothing is quite like hitting the 'O'
> of B-O-B after getting softened up by the first 'B'... :)
>
> - Steve
>
> willy6743 wrote:
> >
> > When I saw the LKHC schedule that was posted yesterday to the
message
> > board, I was disappointed that the classic OLH climb was not in
the
> > schedule. I can see that the organizers want to put some variety
in
> > the event, but I guess from my perspective, I would have liked
to have
> > that climb in the mix as a sort of benchmark to compare from
year to
> > year - not only my performance, but also the performance of the
group
> > as a whole. And what better climb to do it on than OLH?
> >
> > Anyway, hopefully in future years OLH will become a permanent
climb so
> > that we can gauge performances from year to year.
> >
> > -Bill
> >
> > Oh, and when can we expect to see the schedule as a Google
Calendar
> > event as it was last year?
> >
> >
>