Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
lakers · Los Angeles Lakers E-mail List
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
NBA's credibility is now under question   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #12516 of 12854 |
NBA's credibility is now under question because of gambling
allegations

OPINION By Michael Wilbon, Columnist

Whether or not these allegations by former referee Tim Donaghy about
game-fixing are true, the NBA is facing an enormous issue.
Commissioner David Stern can rail all he wants at his accuser, a
convicted felon, and a cynical news media. But it's indisputable,
whether you believe Donaghy, that the league's credibility is now at
the center of public debate. And that is a much more damaging
problem, potentially, than the NFL has had with Spygate.
One complex, multifaceted topic dominated the national sports
discussion Wednesday, and it wasn't Celtics vs. Lakers in the NBA
Finals. It was Refgate. It was Donaghy's public allegation that the
league and its referees conspired to favor the Los Angeles Lakers at
the expense of the Sacramento Kings in the 2002 Western Conference
finals. It was Donaghy crashing the NBA's biggest celebration in 10
years. It was Stern's stern reaction to Donaghy. And it was the
notion that the NBA perhaps ought to stop assailing the messenger and
conduct some serious self-examination, sooner rather than later.

It's a good thing for the NBA that the Lakers and Kings both play in
the state of California; that will presumably preclude one of the
state's many elected officials from calling for a congressional
inquiry since the team that benefited from the horrendous officiating
six years ago lives here, as well as the aggrieved party. Then again,
perhaps what the league needs is for someone to take an Arlen Specter
level of interest and demand a fuller inquiry into this mess.

As obsessively as Spygate was covered by the media, it was still a
story of one team trying to get a competitive advantage. It was
isolated and more than a little vague. People are still debating how
much benefit the spying team could derive. But a problem with
referees, even if more perceived than real, affects the entire league
and the presumed legitimacy of the competition. There's nothing fuzzy
with tampering with the results. And because this notion of
conspiring to arrange the outcome didn't start with Donaghy, but is
certainly seen as fair game because of his allegations, we're way
past the point, whether Stern wants to admit it, where reminding the
public that Donaghy is a sleazebag and a felon addresses the critical
issue.

Stern told a handful of reporters before Game 3 of the NBA Finals
that he's aware of the perception problem and will address it later.

That's not good enough. It needs to be addressed now. Stern needs to
empower an independent panel to investigate referees and their
relationship with the league in much the same way Major League
Baseball conducted an independent investigation into steroid use.
Stern told us the U.S. Attorney's office and the FBI had thoroughly
investigated all of Donaghy's claims. Yet, Bob Delaney, one of the
three officials who worked the infamous Lakers-Kings Game 6 in 2002,
told ESPN he had not been questioned. So, how thorough could the
investigation have been? Did somebody forget? Was it a whitewash? Was
Dick Bavetta, who also worked that game, questioned? Was Ted
Bernhardt, the third official, questioned?

Not many people are marching in lock step with Stern's plea to simply
boo Donaghy and get on with the Finals. People employed by his own
league's member clubs aren't buying that. Stern fined then-Rockets
Coach Jeff Van Gundy an unheard-of sum of $100,000 for saying he was
told by a league executive that Yao Ming had been targeted to be
called for a certain kind of foul. Now, Donaghy's claims support Van
Gundy's assertion. Maybe Stern will refund Van Gundy's 100 grand,
maybe not.

Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban has for years been calling for a
complete overhaul and independent monitoring of the league's
officials. Phil Jackson is quoted by various news organizations as
saying he and many of the coaches also want a separation of referees
and the league. He was quoted saying that referees should be under a
separate entity than the NBA entirely. "It seems to be more
consistent with what we want to have happen to keep it from being
influenced," Jackson said.

On the other hand, coaches aren't without blame in the larger
perception of officials being handled by the league and its
television partners to guarantee the most attractive matchups.
Jackson and Pat Riley, above all others, have raised to an art form
the off-day bashing of referees and the fouls called the previous
game (if they've lost that game) since the late 1980s. The two have
won 14 of the NBA's last 25 league championships and fans have taken
their cue from them as much if not more than columnists or talk-show
hosts that Stern would like to dump the entire mess on.

Most of us, beyond some flippant mention of conspiracies, have never
bought into the notion of the league arranging results. How, at a
time when nobody can keep anything secret, would that not have been
discovered years ago, even if by accident? I covered the 2002 Kings-
Lakers game and found the officiating that night to be offensively
bad. But the three referees in question have been too good over too
long a period of time for me to buy that they conspired without
Donaghy providing some tangible proof to such an end. Did they
receive money, and if so, from whom? If they were simply "company
men" as suggested, then to whom were they so frighteningly loyal?

Of course, Donaghy and his lawyers know Stern has no such proof. But
one of Stern's biggest problems, as he tries to convince the general
public that everything in his league is fine, is that he can't prove
there wasn't conspiracy to fix. Thing is, we know Donaghy's a cheat;
his credibility really isn't ultimately at issue here. The NBA's is.
What is David Stern going to do to convince the ticket-buying, shoe-
purchasing, soda-guzzling patrons of his league and its sponsors that
the results of his league's competition are beyond reproach? A
growing cynicism, even among people who like the product and call
themselves basketball fans, will do the league great harm if the
commissioner doesn't move quickly and decisively.

© 2008 The Washington Post Company

URL: http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/25099076/





Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:01 pm

nmlakerfan
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #12516 of 12854 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

NBA's credibility is now under question because of gambling allegations OPINION By Michael Wilbon, Columnist Whether or not these allegations by former referee...
nmlakerfan
Offline Send Email
Jun 13, 2008
11:01 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help