Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
kitesnowboarding
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
War Over Weather   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1289 of 1770 |
Taken from another group I’m on. Many of you, I’m sure, already know of this, nevertheless, it’s relevant to our hobbies, and important to be kept aware of such despicable things. I have already sent letters to my congresspeople, I urge others who haven’t yet, to do so.


On 6/20/05 11:24 PM, "The Fiedlers" <fiedler1@...> wrote:

Shocking what the government attempts!


WAR OVER THE WEATHER
It's an unseasonably fluky day when a member of Congress tries to
punish a government entity for doing too good of a job. In this case,
the National Weather Service apparently has been putting out too much
useful information. Its graphics and Web site are more user-friendly
and better-organized than ever. Its forecasts are clear and concise.
And it's free. For shame!

Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) argues that the National Weather Service has
an unfair competitive advantage against commercial weather businesses.
He makes no secret of the fact that more than a dozen of those private
companies happen to be based in his state, where he happens to be
running for re-election.

Santorum has a bill that would require the National Weather Service to
give much of its data only to private companies like AccuWeather and
WeatherBank, which repackage the taxpayer-funded information for radio
and TV and the like to make their tidy profits. The bill appears to
block the Weather Service from providing this information directly to
the public. The public would still pay to collect this information. It
just wouldn't have access to what it's paying for.

If private weather companies want competition, let them start by buying
their own satellites, buoys, aircraft, upper-air weather balloons and
other fancy barometric equipment. Let them create their own multimodel
ensemble blends and generate their own storm warnings and small craft
advisories. And then let's talk. The public pays for the National
Weather Service. The public should be able to use it. - Excerpts from
an editorial in the Chicago Tribune, full editorial:
http://tinyurl.com/9gn4w





this is disgusting; that these private companies, and a $hort $ighted $enator, have the audacity to rob, and re-sell us information,

which we pay for with huge portions of our income and taxed goods and services.

mykl

--


"America is the country that fought for freedom, then
  began passing laws to get rid of it."

     - Alfred E. Neuman (MAD Magazine)


Tue Jun 21, 2005 10:06 am

djteklife
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #1289 of 1770 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Taken from another group I¹m on. Many of you, I¹m sure, already know of this, nevertheless, it¹s relevant to our hobbies, and important to be kept aware of...
Mykl Silva
djteklife
Offline Send Email
Jun 21, 2005
10:06 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help