That's a good thing to know about the Ruger. I've been reading good
things about the Browning, so at this point I'm leaning more in that
direction.

And yeah, the S&W 41 is undoubtedly awesome, but that's a *wee* bit more
than I'm looking to spend :)

Thanks for the advice.

Brandon


hawkeye_629 wrote:
> --- In guntotingliberals@yahoogroups.com, Brandon Chase
> <Brandon.Chase@S...> wrote:
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>I'm thinking of picking up a .22 pistol for target practice, so I've
>>been looking at the Browning Buckmark and the Ruger MKII/MKIII. Any
>>thoughts as to which is a better pistol for the money?
>>
>>Also, are there any other .22 pistols you think I should consider?
>>
>>Brandon
>>
>>
>>Brandon, those are both good pistols. The Ruger can be a bear to
>
> field strip for cleaning. If you have the money or can find a used one
> nothing beats a Smith Wesson 41. I have one and love it. If you want
> to consider a pistol your pretty much limited to Smith Wesson 617, but
> get the 6inch barrel and 6 capacity, not the 10. Taurus makes a decent
> pistol too for less money.
>
>>------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
------------------------------------------------------------

Brandon Chase
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
500 Eldorado Blvd. M/S UBRM04-145
Broomfield, CO 80021

phone: (303) 272-5256
fax: (303) 272-5758
email: brandon.chase@...