Agree with stat comparison. However, Rice played in the expansion stat
distortion era, and was not the all around ballplayer Gil was. And, stats are
the worst way to evaluate a ballplayer. If one uses stats alone compare stats to
own era players.
 
John Matits

--- On Mon, 1/12/09, bklynbum14 <no_reply@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

From: bklynbum14 <no_reply@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [GIL HODGES HALL OF FAME SUPPORT] Jim Rice finally in Hall
To: gilhodgeshalloffamesupport@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, January 12, 2009, 9:30 PM







Glad Jim got in , now some more comparisons to GIL as homers and RBI are
similar to JIM but Rice had .300 lifetime average----I am glad for Jim
but would be gladder for GIL

BE WELL--CONTINUE THE QUEST

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


















[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]