I don't really care if Galloway stays or goes. I know I'm going to
get alot of flak for saying this, but here it is: I'd rather have
Keyshawn over Galloway. Keyshawn is much more reliable. He isn't hurt
nearly as much, he doesn't drop the balls Galloway does, and he
doesn't run out of bounds to avoid contact. I can't stand to see
Galloway return punts especially, because he ALWAYS catches the ball
as runs sideways, never upfield. Keyshawn is a better overall
receiver than Galloway.

--- In dallascowboyfanclub@yahoogroups.com, stephenjn <no_reply@y...>
wrote:
> Aren't salary reductions actually just extending the
> contract out over more years for a large signing bonus?
>
> I personally feel Galloway could be VERY productive...
> with the right QB....
>
> I think more revolves around QB and RB than WR right
> now, and there is time to make the decision on
> Galloway.
>
>
> --- In dallascowboyfanclub@yahoogroups.com, "dallasfan4evr"
> <wcoleman31@y...> wrote:
> > News
> > Wide receiver Joey Galloway is scheduled to cost the Cowboys $8
> > million against the salary cap in 2004, and the Cowboys will
likely
> > pursue avenues to change that situation, the Fort Worth-Star
> Telegram
> > reported. One option is to release Galloway prior to June 1,
which
> > would save the team roughly $2.8 million of that total. If the
team
> > waits until after June 1 to release the receiver, Galloway would
> > count only $1.8 million against the cap. Galloway has also
publicly
> > said that he is willing to consider a salary reduction to stay
with
> > the team.