well i can't help that thousands of people are idiots who're to lazy
to search out the millions of other FREE websites that contain the
same information

--- In dallascowboyfanclub@yahoogroups.com, "Dan" <viper4445@...>
wrote:
>
> my point was, you asked what makes them think their opinions are
more
> valable and they can charge for them, and im just saying that by
> thousands of people paying for that info, that shows that they CAN
> charge for it
>
> --- In dallascowboyfanclub@yahoogroups.com, ccw_1982 <no_reply@>
> wrote:
> >
> > i don't know why i said EA...likely because my subconcious hates
> > them as much as i do ESPN for their lack of consideration to the
> fan.
> >
> > now i have to ask....by thousands of people are you referring to
> > everyone but yourself? Because you already stated you piggy back
> > off another persons account ;).
> >
> > I've always hated companies who feel like their OPINION is more
> > valuable than some smuck on another website who's able to give me
> > the same information for free....90% of the time it's the same
> > garbage reworded to fit how they feel about the situation. I'm
not
> > saying everything about ESPN is bad, but they aren't exactly
> hurting
> > for money to the point that they need to have 90% of the real
> > stories "insider exclusives". At the very least they could
create
> a
> > seperate section for that news. It pisses me off when i log in
and
> > see 90% of the page covered in that little symbol that indicates
> you
> > need to be an insider to read the story. The money is nothing,
i
> > waste more than that on my lunch every day, it's about principal
> and
> > there will never be a day i pay for some "smuck's" opinion.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In dallascowboyfanclub@yahoogroups.com, "Dan" <viper4445@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > probablly the thousands of people that pay for it.
> > >
> > > --- In dallascowboyfanclub@yahoogroups.com, ccw_1982
<no_reply@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > i realized that a long time ago....nothing pisses me off
worse
> > > than
> > > > when EA teases you with one of their top stories only to have
> > you
> > > click
> > > > on the link and find out it's for "insider's only". what
> > really
> > > makes
> > > > them think their opinion is that much better than the
millions
> > of
> > > FREE
> > > > websites that contain the same NEWS worded slightly
different?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In dallascowboyfanclub@yahoogroups.com, stephenjn
> > <no_reply@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Of the four of five major sports site on the internet do
you
> > > consider
> > > > > the worst one?
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll give my vote to ESPN. I was jumping all over the
> > internet
> > > this
> > > > > weekend for updated draft knowledge and have come to
realize
> > > that if
> > > > > you are not an "insider" you cannot read over 3/4 of the
> > > articles
> > > > that
> > > > > they post on their site.
> > > > >
> > > > > SI seems to be the best.....?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>