that's right, i do believe you're correct....not sure why i was
thinking it was a 3rd round pick, but either way he was a steal. I
have yet to see why he was ever a problem on his old team, just glad
parcells made the move to get him

as with galloway's arm muscle celebration, i would rather watch that
than the choreographed jokes that have become the norm for TD
celebrations. what ever happened to spiking the damn ball???



--- In dallascowboyfanclub@yahoogroups.com, "Dan" <viper4445@a...>
wrote:
>
> Actually, I think it was like a 6th round pick for Glenn. And
about
> Galloway...DUDE: GET A NEW TOUCHDOWN CELEBRATION! We have all seen
> your freaking arm muscle, alright? It's very impressive, you do
not
> need to show it off every single time you score!
>
> --- In dallascowboyfanclub@yahoogroups.com, ccw_1982
<no_reply@y...>
> wrote:
> >
> > i think the difference between then and now is the O-Line...JJ
> > doesn't have near the holes to work with that emmitt had during
> the
> > glory years.
> >
> > also what made emmitt so great was his ability to be patient and
> let
> > the play develope....speed only helps if you can get past the
> > tacklers, not sure why JJ has suddenly fallen off this year, but
> > lets just hope he regains his swagger that he showed at the end
of
> > last season
> >
> > and am i the only one who still remembers how big of a steal
glenn
> > was...i believe he only cost us a 3rd round pick, between him
and
> > keyshawn i have yet to see why so many teams had problems with
> these
> > guys.....which also i will say that it looks like the
> > keyshawn/galloway trade was good for both sides, everytime i see
> the
> > stats galloway is putting up big numbers in tampa, i'm happy for
> him
> >
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > >
> > > One at a time:
> > >
> > > Irvin in his prime vs. Keyshawn now, I agree... I meant to say
> > they
> > > are similar players and similarly good at what they do. Irvin
> was
> > a
> > > more emotional leader, though.
> > >
> > > I said JJ was not as tough as Emmitt but is significantly
faster
> > and
> > > I'll stand by that assessment. I'm not saying those things
> cancel
> > > out, nor that those are the only differences. You could say
the
> > same
> > > about Tony Dorsett vs. Emmitt, and that doesn't mean JJ is
equal
> > to
> > > Dorsett, either.
> > >
> > > Bledsoe doesn't have Aikman's accuracy or consistency, but he
> > looks
> > > to throw for more yardage and not at the cost of too many
INTs.
> > His
> > > Number's for the first half season are rather Aikman-like...
or
> > > better... he's just streakier. He's definitely the best since
> > Aikman
> > > in his prime by a very wide margin.
> > >
> > > Harper had a vertical leap, but a vertical leap does not a
> > receiver
> > > make. He barely made the then-offensively-impaired Buccaneers
> and
> > > then disappeared. Glenn would be a contributor on almost any
> team
> > in
> > > the league right now.
> > >
> > > And I said "when Crayton returns", didn't I?
> > >
> > > Anyhow, my point was not that these guys are going to the hall
> of
> > > fame like the Triplets (what these cowboys will be long-term,
> > remains
> > > to be seen)... it's that we've got as much or more balance...
as
> > many
> > > or more weapons... as many or more threats that can beat you
as
> > the
> > > early 90's cowboys. I say "more" because, again, I think the
> > modern
> > > cowboys are actually significantly better at #2 and #3
receiver
> > than
> > > they were 12 years ago. I wouldn't expect Bledsoe and Keyshawn
> to
> > > make Deion Sanders and Darrel Green in their primes look like
> > > pedestrian CB's like Aikman and Irvin did... but look at the
way
> > the
> > > offense spreads the ball around... and look at the speed and
> > > breakaway potential we have and I submit this every bit as
> > dangerous
> > > an offense as those ones were.
> > >
> >
>