he worldcup is on. The whole world is interested
to find out who is the best cricketer in the world?
Is it Lara? Tendulkar? or Klusener? or<br>Kallis?
The argument never ends.<br><br>In each country there
is a debate on who<br>is the best player? Is it Hick
for England? Warne for Australia? Muralitharan for
Sri Lanka?<br> It is a matter of passion and also
a<br>commercial necessity to evaluate the performance of each
player.<br>But how do we evaluate who is the best player? Shall
we follow the "CeatRating? or "Kumble Rating" or
"Pricewterhouse-Cooper ratings"? or Amul Ratings?<br>None of these are
really satisfactory.<br>Now the latest and the most
intelligent rating methdology is
here<br><a href=http://www.naavi.com/rating.htm.
target=new>http://www.naavi.com/rating.htm.</a> <br>Every cricket lover would
love to follow the
"Race for the man of World cup 99" at
<a href=http://www.naavi.com/man.htm
target=new>http://www.naavi.com/man.htm</a><br><br>naavi