Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
collegerpi
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Cincinnati   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1923 of 2118 |
Re: [collegerpi] Cincinnati

Here's my take, please feel free to bash my rationale. After the initial hit of
Kirkland's injury, and losing 4 of 5, they have played decent to good ball, and
proved their ability to succeed without Kirkland.

They've gone 4-3 with with 3 top-100 wins (one of which a top-50 win at
Syracuse, which was very very key, a roadie and top-50, big for a potential 8-12
seed late in the season).

Their losses are to 3 top-50 teams (all of whom are staring down favored seeds
in the tourney) and played 2 of them very tough, and they've even "gotten back"
two of the initial losses right after the Kirkland injury (the aforementioned
17-point win at 'Cuse and the 6 point win over Louisville).

I think it is difficult to leave out a team ranked #25 in the RPI and with the
3 ranked schedule in the country who isn't playing decisively poor in the
absence of an injured player. If they don't lose their final three (@Hall, home
v. W.Virginia, 1st round of the BE tourney), I have to think they are in
(unless, MAYBE, they lose the final 2 regular season games, beat a bottom-tier
BE team in the first round and lose to a bottom-tier team in the 2nd round, who
got there via upset). There's just too many teams with uglier resumes. Heck,
I've read actual arguments for more than one Mountain West Team ... I know Cincy
gets in before 2 of them.

Then again, if we have any crazy results in Conference Tourneys (West Coast,
Patriot, Washington St winning the Pac-10 tourney, Baylor winning the Big-12
tourney, and yes, Jerry, Purdue winning the Big 10 tourney), all bets are off.

The good news is, most likely, you'll get to be talking tournament much longer
than the rest of your office, whether Cincy gets in or not.

beisthen <beisthen@...> wrote:
What should we make of the University of Cincinnati?

18-10 after last night's close loss vs Villanova. 7-7 in Big East play
with at Seton Hall and vs. West Virginia remaining on the regular
season schedule.

Cons...3-8 in last 11 after Armein Kirkland blew out a knee. Bad loss
vs. Dayton (177th) in December, before Kirkland's injury.

Pros....26 RPI....good wins vs. LSU (16th), at Vanderbilt (59th), at
Syracuse (27th), at Marquette (21st) all before Kirkland's injury.
Split with Louisville (67th) after Kirkland's injury.

So, the resume looked really good in mid-January and kinda lousy if
recent history is the primary guide.

Should Bearcat fans be planning for the Big Dance or that other post-
season tournament?

BobE, Villanova '83, surrounded by an office full of UC alumni.









SPONSORED LINKS
College and university search Colleges and universities College and
university search engine Colleges and universities in College and
university information Basketball sports card

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "collegerpi" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
collegerpi-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, & more on new and
used cars.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






Fri Feb 24, 2006 5:25 pm

chaunceyzeus
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #1923 of 2118 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

What should we make of the University of Cincinnati? 18-10 after last night's close loss vs Villanova. 7-7 in Big East play with at Seton Hall and vs. West...
beisthen
Offline Send Email
Feb 24, 2006
4:50 pm

They started 13-2 (?), but then lost 5 of 6 when the injury occured. Since that drought they are 4-3. They have a top 25 RPI, so you have to think they are...
kennedyandrewm@...
bestfantasygm
Offline Send Email
Feb 24, 2006
5:19 pm

what about george mason??? kennedyandrewm@... wrote: They started 13-2 (?), but then lost 5 of 6 when the injury occured. Since that drought they are...
derek perry
darage_2002
Offline Send Email
Feb 24, 2006
8:39 pm

Here's my take, please feel free to bash my rationale. After the initial hit of Kirkland's injury, and losing 4 of 5, they have played decent to good ball,...
Scott Schwartz
chaunceyzeus
Offline Send Email
Feb 24, 2006
8:40 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help