Just to clarify - I said that a schedule including the three games you
mentioned - at Utah, home with Xavier and Duke at a neutral site - plus
eight or nine patsies did not qualify as a killer schedule, though it
might by Alabama standards.

I think Ohio St will be pretty competitive next season, so that will be
a good game. You probably should have mentioned them the first time.
That's a tougher game than Xavier at home. I don't think Providence
and Ball St will not be good enough to threaten Bama at Bama. That is
if the Tide are still going to be good next year.

So now you're talking about three iffy games (and I'm not so sure about
Utah next year) and eight or nine gimmes (depending on how many games
they play).

--- Hugh Wolfgang <hughwolfgang@...> wrote:
>
> You said that the rest of Alabama's schedule was patsies. Which of
> these teams are patsies - Ohio State, Utah, Providence, Xavier, or
> Ball State?
>
> >I'm talking about non-conference schedules - the part the team has
> some<BR>
> >control of. And I'm not suggesting the team has to lose four or
> five<BR>
> >games to suggest that it's a difficult schedule, but that they
> have<BR>
> >that many potential losses.<BR>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> collegerpi-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


=====
*********************************************
* Jerry Palm * *
* CollegeRPI.com * Is this the real life? *
* CollegeBCS.com * Is this just fantasy? *
* Schererville, IN * *
*********************************************

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com