Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
clarets · Burnley FC E-Mail Group
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Strongest team 2   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #11301 of 15700 |
[clarets] Re: Strongest team 2

Gareth - you must be on another planet preferring Cooke to Payton. Payton's
record speaks for itself. And to have a go for him missing one penalty, I
think we all remember Cooke's efforts from the spot.

The point that you all seem to be missing is that goals are going in at the
other end and Davis (who you seem to think will be missed when suspended) is
no more than a shadow of his former self these days and definitely a weak
link in the defence.
If only for a performance from him like the one we saw from Steve Davis Mark
1 in the last home game or from Matthew Redmile last match at Notts County.
When you are being beaten for pace by Brett Angell you have a problem.

Tony
-----Original Message-----
From: G. D. Kay <MDA97GDK@...>
To: clarets@egroups.com <clarets@egroups.com>
Date: 05 January 2000 16:26
Subject: [clarets] Re: Strongest team 2


>Andrew,
>
>Well, at least we agree on the lone striker option, though I'm not
>sure whether your team is your own choice or more of a prediction
>of what Stan's is going to be. Still, good news about Davis being
>available for saturday, although maybe we should prefer him to
>miss cup games and play in the league.
>
>The other point to raise is the use of Dean West - there is a pattern
>emerging with West being withdrawn every game to be replaced by
>a proper player in an attempt to save the match. I've seen enough
>of this joker to see that he's just a right footed Vinnicombe - weak
>in defence and worse going forward.
>
>K.
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, email clarets-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>Please post within the guidelines of the Egroup FAQ:
>http://www.emailgroup.clarets.co.uk/faq.htm
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>eNutrition can help you keep all your healthy New Year’s resolutions.
>And right now, get $10 off a minimum purchase of $25. From vitamins
>and supplements, to weight loss aides, eNutrition has is all.
>http://click.egroups.com/1/386/2/_/960/_/947088482
>
>-- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar!
>-- http://www.egroups.com/cal?listname=clarets&m=1
>
>
>




Wed Jan 5, 2000 4:59 pm

tony.scholes@...
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #11301 of 15700 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

After recent results I can definately see Stan putting out a defensive team to try to get a draw and bring them back to the Turf (Coventry have been absolutely...
Bellamy, Andrew
Andrew.Bellamy@...
Send Email
Jan 5, 2000
2:01 pm

Andrew, Well, at least we agree on the lone striker option, though I'm not sure whether your team is your own choice or more of a prediction of what Stan's is...
G. D. Kay
MDA97GDK@...
Send Email
Jan 5, 2000
4:04 pm

Gareth - you must be on another planet preferring Cooke to Payton. Payton's record speaks for itself. And to have a go for him missing one penalty, I think we...
Tony Scholes
tony.scholes@...
Send Email
Jan 5, 2000
4:58 pm

I agree with your West comments, but who have we got to play at right back in a defensive formation? Why is little Tommy Cowan be left out in the wilderness,...
Cliviger
Cliviger@...
Send Email
Jan 7, 2000
10:27 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help