Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
chainguard · Bicycle Advocacy
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Definition of riding abreast   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #22536 of 28261 |
Re: [CG] Definition of riding abreast

It makes a difference to me, but not to you...
hence the opportunity for shifting your point of
view/paradigm for the sharing of public road space.

At 02:17 PM 6/3/2006, Herman I. May wrote:
>On 20060603@01:43CDT, Jim Baross <JimBaross@...> wrote:
>
> > Ready for a paradigm shift?
>
>Your example is not a shift in paradigm; it is a comparison of apples
>and oranges.
>
>While I will not dispute the lack of logic prompting jurisdictions to
>disallow bicyclists the ability to operate two abreast, your
>contention that such is comparable to two or three individuals riding
>side-by-side within the confines of a single motor vehicle is
>specious. There is no law — at least none of which I am aware —
>prohibiting anyone from operating a bicycle taxi capable of
>accommodating two to three passengers, side-by-side.
>
>The prohibition at play concerns two individual cyclists operating two
>separate vehicles side-by-side within the same traffic lane. It makes
>little difference if those two vehicles constitute a width less than
>or equal to a single, enclosed motor vehicle.
>
>Herman









Sun Jun 4, 2006 2:50 am

jimbaross
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #22536 of 28261 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Can someone please help me find a definition of what it means to travel two abreast, especially in the context of when it's legally prohibited? Can it only...
Michael Poplawski
michaelpopla...
Offline Send Email
May 26, 2006
6:17 pm

In Alberta, which I find defines its laws very precisely and accurately (even if I disagree with the intent of some of its cycling laws), defines riding...
Darrell Noakes
borealisoutdoor
Offline Send Email
May 26, 2006
10:47 pm

Ready for a paradigm shift? Many motorists are allowed to operate legally with two and even three people abreast - seated side-by-side in the front or...
Jim Baross
jimbaross
Offline Send Email
Jun 3, 2006
10:15 am

... Your example is not a shift in paradigm; it is a comparison of apples and oranges. While I will not dispute the lack of logic prompting jurisdictions to ...
Herman I. May
kempiweb
Offline Send Email
Jun 4, 2006
2:12 am

The discussions about how much roadway width to allow cyclists, or may be taken by cyclists, are largely irrelevant to cyclists, being little more than...
John Forester
biketransengr
Offline Send Email
Jun 4, 2006
9:40 pm

It makes a difference to me, but not to you... hence the opportunity for shifting your point of view/paradigm for the sharing of public road space....
Jim Baross
jimbaross
Offline Send Email
Jun 4, 2006
2:53 am

... Though Pennsylvania does still represent a success on this point, I believe? Yes, Mr Schubert? Ken ... mail2web - Check your email from the web at ...
kob2@...
kob22225
Offline Send Email
Jun 5, 2006
12:09 pm

The dictionary definition of the word abreast is variously described as: "alongside each other, facing on the same direction" "side by side and facing in the...
Herman I. May
kempiweb
Offline Send Email
May 26, 2006
10:52 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help