Ready for a paradigm shift?

Many motorists are allowed to operate legally with two and even three
people abreast - seated side-by-side in the front or sometimes in the
back seats of their vehicles. The disparity between the space allowed
for motorists to use - even when they are traveling alone/one
a-breast - but not considered allowable for bicyclists seems to be
appropriate to challenge.

I'm looking for a nice light WIDE bicycle.

At 01:47 PM 5/26/2006, Darrell Noakes wrote:
>In Alberta, which I find defines its laws very precisely and accurately
>(even if I disagree with the intent of some of its cycling laws),
>defines riding abreast as follows:
>
>148 A person operating a cycle on a highway
> (a) shall not ride to the side of another cycle travelling in the
>same direction, but
> (b) shall ride directly in line to the rear or front of the other
>cycle, except when overtaking and passing the other cycle.

snip

>Michael Poplawski wrote:
> > Can someone please help me find a definition of what it means to
> > travel two abreast, especially in the context of when it's legally
> > prohibited?
> >