Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
brooklyncyclones2 · BrooklynCyclones2 Fan Page
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Hall Of Shame!   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #44183 of 44742 |
Re: Hall Of Shame!

I am no friend of Moses, but in his dealings with O'Malley I side
with Moses - he upheld what was right. O'Malley had the finances to
buy the land himself without Moses' assistance. He was looking for a
handout that Moses was not going to give him. Did Moses do it for
others? yes - but just because he did it for others doesn;t mean it
would have been right to do it for O'Malley too.

--- In brooklyncyclones2@yahoogroups.com, "pwitt1012" <pwitt1012@...>
wrote:
>
> While O'Malley may not be the villian that our borough president
> portrays him to be, but let's also remember that O'Malley's
baseball
> vision extended only as far as his wallet.
> I don't think he moved the team because of some grand vision he had
> of baseball's future out west, he moved them at the time simply
> because LA offered him the best deal, acres of land for the
princely
> sum of one dollar.
> Like most owners, the man never acted out of what was good for
> baseball, just what was in his best financial interest.
> Had the city been willing to do the same thing then that they're
> doing now with the Atlantic Yards site and condemn the land at
> Flatbush and Atlantic AVE to give to O'Malley instead of Ratner
years
> ago, the Dodgers might still be here.
> Granted the villian to blame here for Brooklyn losing their team is
> Robert Moses not Walter O'Malley.
> But just because O'Malley was a smart businessman who acted in his
> own financial best interest shouldn't be enough to get him elected
to
> the hall of fame.
>
>
>
>
> --- In brooklyncyclones2@yahoogroups.com, dantwo <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > I couldn't disagree more. Regardless about what he did to
> Brooklyn, as
> > a baseball executive O'Malley was one of the top in the game. By
> > moving the Dodgers and Giants (and let's be honest, he moved the
> > Giants - Stoneham was along for the ride), he expanded Major
League
> > Ball to a much more broader audience. He saw the growth of the
> west
> > and knew baseball had to capitalize on that growth.
> >
> > The man was bad for Brooklyn, but good for the game
> >
> > --- In brooklyncyclones2@yahoogroups.com, "samuelfriedman"
> > <samuelfriedman@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I cannot believe that Walter O'Malley, the SOB who robbed
> Brooklyn of
> > > its beloved Dodgers (and a large chunk of its identity in the
> > process)
> > > has been voted into the Hall of Fame! Hall of Shame is more
like
> it.
> > > Sure, New York City politicos were negligent in allowing the
Bums
> to
> > > skip town, but that doesn't absolve O'Malley of his crimes
> against
> > > baseball!!! Shame, shame, shame on the Hall of Fame Veterans
> > > Committee!!!
> > >
> > > Sammy Cyclones
> > >
> >
>





Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:35 am

dantwo
Offline Offline

Forward
Message #44183 of 44742 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

I cannot believe that Walter O'Malley, the SOB who robbed Brooklyn of its beloved Dodgers (and a large chunk of its identity in the process) has been voted...
samuelfriedman
Offline Send Email
Dec 4, 2007
1:27 pm

Yet Gil Hodges is still not in. Go figure. What gives? Jerry **************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest products. ...
JDelPri311@...
Send Email
Dec 4, 2007
3:39 pm

Let's not forget, Sammy, that the Hall of Fame is a Hall of Shame because their special Negro Leagues committee failed to induct a beautiful man - the late...
George Mullins
georgecatzi
Offline Send Email
Dec 4, 2007
9:29 pm

That is indeed a crime--how is that possible??? The man was one of the best catchers (certainly offensively) of all time, right? Sammy C. ... because their...
samuelfriedman
Offline Send Email
Dec 6, 2007
10:22 pm

Buck O'Neil isn't in yet? That's a surprise. ... because their special Negro Leagues committee failed to induct a beautiful man - the late Buck O'Neil. ... of ...
Lou
louthebody
Offline Send Email
Dec 15, 2007
7:23 pm

I couldn't disagree more. Regardless about what he did to Brooklyn, as a baseball executive O'Malley was one of the top in the game. By moving the Dodgers...
dantwo
Offline
Dec 7, 2007
5:27 pm

While O'Malley may not be the villian that our borough president portrays him to be, but let's also remember that O'Malley's baseball vision extended only as...
pwitt1012
Offline Send Email
Dec 8, 2007
6:15 am

I am no friend of Moses, but in his dealings with O'Malley I side with Moses - he upheld what was right. O'Malley had the finances to buy the land himself...
dantwo
Offline
Dec 11, 2007
8:35 am

Basically I dislike both of them, but if I had my pick as to who was the bigger factor in letting the dodgers go, it was definitely Moses. O'Malley was willing...
pwitt1012
Offline Send Email
Dec 12, 2007
2:56 am

You're on the Money with that!!!!!! **************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest products. ...
JDelPri311@...
Send Email
Dec 8, 2007
12:18 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help