On Wed, 17 May 2006 14:57:25 -0000
"Andy Marquez" <uspsaipsc@...> wrote:

> There is a special classifier match scheduled in August (pending
> approval) at which we plan to have four classifiers. I have
> proposed a few and wanted to get some inputs. Please let me know what
> you think.
>
> Proposed: CM 99-28, CM 99-52, CM 99-57, and CM 03-04.
>

Andy, thanks for taking some time to look into this. I like the first 3 a lot.
I have never done them and they look real interesting. However, 03-04 has been
done at TASC in the last year and Richmond like 4 months ago. BTW nice use of
no-shoots behind steel. I know that was real popular the last time we did it!
;-)

>
> I thought CM 03-16 would be good as well, but I was not sure if we
> could have T1 and T4 at such tight angles at Chabot.
>

I don't think the angles are actually that bad on this one. The far targets
are only 10yards away. And the close targets are only 3 yards to the side.
But in the end it will have to be looked at on the range.

>
> Alternates: CM 99-08, CM 99-11, CM 99-42, CM 99-58, CM 03-02, CM 03-08.
>

Of these I like 99-58, again the others have been done within the last year
either by TASC or Richmond.

I think replace 03-04 with 03-16 and if 03-16 can't be done we should do 99-58.

Just my opinion, and you know what they say about those... ;-)

Ira