Thanks for the feedback. Someone else suggeted field courses too. I
was concerned that we might not have the props of the right
dimensions. CM 99-52 has *some* movement and CM 03-16 as well (but
not sure we can accomodate the angles safely).

Any suggestions as to which field courses you think we could setup?

Thanks again,

Andy

--- In bauspsa@yahoogroups.com, "tyro480" <tyro480@...> wrote:
>
> Andy
>
> The choice is yours to make since you've volunteered to take on
this
> task. However asking for suggestions is a positive to get people
> envolved. TASC has done a lot of speed shoots or shall I say high
> HF classifiers. I would suggest looking at having a couple of
Field
> courses as a balance. The draw back is the step up time. You can
> count me in on helping to set those.>
>
> > There is a special classifier match scheduled in August (pending
> > approval) at which we plan to have four classifiers. I have
> > proposed a few and wanted to get some inputs. Please let me know
> what
> > you think.
> >
> > Proposed: CM 99-28, CM 99-52, CM 99-57, and CM 03-04.
> >
> > I thought CM 03-16 would be good as well, but I was not sure if
we
> > could have T1 and T4 at such tight angles at Chabot.
> >
> > Alternates: CM 99-08, CM 99-11, CM 99-42, CM 99-58, CM 03-02, CM
> 03-08.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Andy
> >
>