The "holes" in our data is as follows. I suggest that this post gets
updated going forward.
Hitting:
SB - 1876 to 1885
CS - 1876 to 1919
IBB - 1871 to 1954
HBP - 1871 to 1883
GIDP - 1871 to 1932
RBOE - all years
SH - 1871 to 1894
SF - 1871 to 1953
(though I realize that the way the SH and SF rules and recording
practices were at the time that it might not even be possible to
separate things)
Pitching:
for any years where it was recorded:
pitch counts, balls, strikes
for 1871 to 1875:
IBB, WP, HBP, BK, BFP, GF, R
for all years:
RBOE, 2B, 3B, SB, CS, CI, Pickoffs
IBB - through to 1954
HBP - maybe through 1883 (DB shows zero where it should probably be
null from 1876-1883)
BK - maybe through 1880 (DB shows zero where it may or may not be
null from 1876-1880)
Fielding:
for any years where it was recorded:
"balls in zone"
for 1871 to 1875 (for catchers):
PB
for all years (for catchers):
SB, CS, CI, Pickoffs
for all years through 1999 (but not for pitchers):
GS, InnOuts
for all years through 1995:
Splitting OF data into LF/CF/RF
***
Note: design change needs to occur to show games played by OF, as
well as by any position. This has been discussed with the
APPEARANCES table.
I noticed that SH and SF allowed data seems to be missing from the pitching tables. Was this omission intentional (or did I misread the documentation)? While...
... I don't believe it was intentional. I don't believe the data is known, and the columns were added with the intention that it would be added in the future....
... That's odd. My database has this information and I believe I got it originally from the 1994 TB CD, which I think was also the source for Sean's data. ...
... Ahh, I didn't think we had SH and SF columns, but I was too lazy to check and took Tom's note to say they were in there. We have never had these columns,...
... I'm too busy working on the next release of the Retrosheet web-site, transaction data and player data-base right now, but in a month or so I would be more...
"...pitcher doubles, triples allowed, stolen bases and caught stealing? catcher wild pitches? batting reached on catcher interference" I will just say yes,...
... Thank you Tom. We will certainly take you up on the offer. Sincerely, Sean Forman Baseball Stats! http://www.Baseball-Reference.com/ Baseball Analysis!...
... Well, the updates to the web-site have now been released. Sean, do you want to send me a list of what you want or should there be some discussion on the...
The "holes" in our data is as follows. I suggest that this post gets updated going forward. Hitting: SB - 1876 to 1885 CS - 1876 to 1919 IBB - 1871 to 1954 ...
This list has been appended with Sean's note regarding breaking down start/relief appearances, which is really a great suggestion. Tom *** The "holes" in our...
... Going through old box scores, these often were recorded differently. A few other notes: * The original (1969) Baseball Encyclopedia had innings pitched and...
Tom, Thank you again for the offer. I think we should start out small and get things tied together. In fielding, we could use Catcher SB, CS, and Catcher...
... What about SB and CS for pitchers? By the way, something I keep track on Retrosheet is WP for catchers and passed balls for pitchers. ... What's the rule...
... Tom, you and I are among the handfuls (I think) that looks at this. If I was the Dr Evil of baseball, I would certainly add it. Not that we're going to do...
... handsful, I think ... I agree. If the NA Statistics Project were rerun today, it would be worthwhile to compile these disaggregated statistics. As it is,...
... Paul: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=handfuls In any case, I wasn't pondering the spelling of the word, but rather the idea that very few people...
... Absolutely. All four would be great. ... I'm not sure which is better or if a standard policy has been applied to the data in the BDB. ... I'm referring...
Tom R: Also, batting and pitching data by BALLPARK by year, broken down by home team and away team, and by LH and RH hitters, would be awsome. I already have...