hi matt not sure about ratio all i know is i have never done pull
ups till recently due to my shoulder ,but after the AWR split the
records i did two large sessions and that confirmed to me there is
not much difference,and just broke the record with ease,if i now
train on pull ups as i did on chin ups i will be very disappointed if
i didn't get close to or equal my c ups,if as you say the hour was
the easiest one to beat why didn't you do it,if chin ups are
easier,why not come after my records as i am coming after your one.
See the difference between you and me matt is i don't do ratio i just
do reps 1000s of them so lets see now, how well i do with P U ,if
nothing else it makes a change.

steve
ps i am right, you only hold the minute record as the 30min has still
not been accepted on the AWR site, why is it taking so long to be
verified.

So lets not get ahead of ourselves the only man to beat
is Guy Schott as he holds the 12hour 6hour 30min and still the one
hour in PULL UPS till my new attempt is verified.



--- In STREND@yahoogroups.com, Matt Bogdanowicz <skate_94538@...>
wrote:
>
> Stephen,
>
> Right on way to go! Like I said the easiest one is the one hour
(Guy Schott)
> I am still on my prediction to hold the three Pull up World
records before the end of the year, 1 minute- 30 minute and 60 minute
records:
> We have been working on the conversion: So far looking like 1.13-
1.15, so 720 pull ups is close to 820 chins. What do you think?
> Got to go! Turkey Day!!!! Trying to gain a Kilo or two!
>
> Matt
>
> stephen <haygem8@...> wrote:
> hi matt just done my first PULL UP WORLD RECORD THE OTHER
DAY AND IT IS
> ALREADY IN THE POST TO RALF.
>
> REGARDS STEVE.
>
> PS QUOTE of the day Few men have the natural strength to honour a
> friends success with out envy.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "The hardest struggle of all is to be something different from what
the average man is."
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you with Yahoo
Mobile. Try it now.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>