23 Apr 2006, Trent McCotter <treant985@...> wrote:

> The game in question is the first game of the August 3 doubleheader,
> 1894.
[versus Baltimore]
Hamilton is listed by ICI, the WAS Post, and CHI Tribune as
> scoring 0 runs (and his teammate Jack Boyle scoring 4 runs); however,
> the Boston Globe lists Hamilton with 1 run and Boyle with 3.
>
> If Elias has good evidence that Hamilton should be given a run scored
> in this game, then that means he should be credited with an amazing
> 199 runs scored for that season! That's 22 more than any other player
> in any other season.

I just noticed the change from 192 runs to 198. Is that covered in a
21st century number of the newsletter?

Paul Wendt