Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
SABR_Records · SABR Baseball Records Committee
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
rule determining champion   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #21 of 715 |
I assume most of you will be able to straighten me out on this right away.

The Reach Guide from 1883 (and 1884 and probably many other years, too) says
"The club which shall have won the greatest percentage of games played in
the championship series, shall be declared the Champion Club of America, for
the season in which such games were played. In the event that two or more
clubs shall have won the same percentage of games, then the club which shall
have lost the smallest percentage of games shall be declared the champion."

I interpret this to mean that tie games are included in the calculation of
winning and losing percentage. For example, Team A goes 60-40-0, Team B
goes 60-39-1. Both have the same percentage of games won (60/100), but Team
B has a smaller percentage of games lost (39/100 vs. 40/100) so Team B is
champion.

If that's not the correct interpretation, then under what circumstances
would the second sentence of the rule be invoked?

If my interpretation is correct, then if Team A goes 60-40-0 and Team C goes
59-39-2, Team A would be declared champion (60/100 better than 59/100), even
though Team C has the better percentage of games won when ignoring tie games
(59/98 better than than 60/100).

Any thoughts about this?

Thanks,
JP Caillault





Sat Feb 18, 2006 8:14 pm

harry_stovey
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #21 of 715 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

I assume most of you will be able to straighten me out on this right away. The Reach Guide from 1883 (and 1884 and probably many other years, too) says "The...
Jean-Pierre CAILLAULT
harry_stovey
Offline Send Email
Feb 18, 2006
8:14 pm

... right away. ... too) says ... played in ... America, for ... or more ... which shall ... champion." ... calculation of ... Team B ... (60/100), but Team ...
hatchersj
Offline Send Email
Feb 21, 2006
10:01 pm

21 Feb 2006, hatchersj quoted JPC and replied. I have abbreviated both. ... "those days" is a broad brush ... First, that is the NL. Reach was the official...
Paul Wendt
pgw02472
Offline Send Email
Feb 22, 2006
3:13 pm

... both. ... years, ... They ... decided ... My point here is that tie games wouldn't have counted for anything before 1885. But I may be painting with a...
hatchersj
Offline Send Email
Feb 22, 2006
10:27 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help