On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 21:53 +0000, Forbes Bagatelle-Black wrote:
> --- In KOG@yahoogroups.com, Kogswell Cycles <kogswellcycles@...> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:43 PM, e-RICHIE<richardsachs@...> wrote:
> >
> > >>> Too bad they don't define what 'production' means.
> >
> > > everything is "production" atmo.
> > > just because you can't keep up with
> > > demand doesn't mean it's uci illegal.
> >
> > huh?
> >
> > so if I produce one bike every decade then
> > my bikes qualify?
> >
> If you assign it a part number and keep a record of it in a database, then
yes. Why should Richard be penalized because he only makes X bikes per year?
If he designs an "Hour Record" frame and markets it as a product, I say it's a
production bike no matter how many he makes, even if his design allows for a bit
of change between builds.
>

Of course, since his order book is closed, it's all academic...