At 21:29 -0600 03.02.2007, Kogswell Cycles wrote:
>On 3/2/07, joel metz
><<mailto:magpie%40blackbirdsf.org>magpie@...> wrote:
>
>> ugly. and the backstops too far away from the headtube. and less
>> holes in the fork legs is always better than more.
>
>On 3/2/07, Mark Vande Kamp
><<mailto:mevk%40u.washington.edu>mevk@...> wrote:
>
>> I have one word to mention that springs to mind regarding
>> the rack for sure, and somewhat regarding the seatstays as well:
>
>> Triangulation
>
>You guys are so left brain.

hey, if thinking the primary goal of a functional object should be it
being functional means im left brain, then so be it.

i can live with that. my right brain knows which arguments not to
pick :) its plenty adventurous, but it allows the left equal time in
aesthetic discussions.

(it also thinks that rack perched off the front of that bike is
visually unpleasing. looks like an afterthought. incongruous, and not
in the good way.)

-joel

--
joel metz : magpie@... : http://www.blackbirdsf.org/
bike messengers worldwide : ifbma : http://www.messengers.org/
magpie messenger collective http://www.magpiemessenger.com/
portland, oregon
==
i know what innocence looks like - and it wasn't there,
after she got that bicycle...