Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
GORGEwindsurfer
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Broughton   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1909 of 3097 |
Re: Broughton

Very disappointing indeed.
Apparently all they care about is extra property tax revenue for
Skamania county.
Who's going to pay several hundred thousand $$$ for a vacation home
that you can only use for 45 days during peak season? How could this
possibly be enforced?
It's way beyond dumb ....
bobg

>
> > The Gorge Commission decided who they would rather kiss up to, and
> > who they would rather be sued by. Those of us who attended the
> > meetings knew this weeks ago, yet, my heart sank when I heard the
> > news today. Our public testimony is not in vain. Every bit of it,
> > and the fact of the sheer volume of same, is a matter of public
> > record and fully admissible in Court. Thanks to all, stay tuned
> > and....... support Friends of the Gorge
http://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/5111/t/1543/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=88
>

> >
> > With the revisions, an unspecified number of housing units --
> > averaging 1,300 square feet -- can be built. Original plans by the
> > developer called for up to 250 units.
> >
> > Restrictions have been put in place to limit how long someone can
> > stay on the property. Deemed "short-term occupancy" by the
> > commission, eventual unit owners could spend up to 45 days out of 90
> > living at the property, to be called Broughton Landing.
> >
> > There are no requirements that the units be rented out when not
> > occupied by the owner. Some commissioners complained that a family
> > could live at the development for half the year.
> >
> > "If it's a second home, I believe that's residential" and not
> > commercial recreation, said Commissioner Honna Sheffield, who
voted against the plan amendment with Commissioner Jim Middaugh.
> >




Wed Apr 9, 2008 5:38 am

bobgreenberg
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #1909 of 3097 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date
Laurie Balmuth
llbalmuth
Offline Send Email
Apr 9, 2008
5:11 am

Very disappointing indeed. Apparently all they care about is extra property tax revenue for Skamania county. Who's going to pay several hundred thousand $$$...
Bob Greenberg
bobgreenberg
Offline Send Email
Apr 9, 2008
5:38 am

... 1. The appeal was filed in court by Friends September 5, 2008 2. The forest service gave the development a boost October 19th...
Laurie Balmuth
llbalmuth
Offline Send Email
Oct 22, 2008
6:09 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help