Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
FiendsofSedgleyWoods · FIENDS of Sedgley Woods
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Playing for tags in a non official tag round - Why not?   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #3023 of 3268 |
What do you think about being able to play each other for each
others particular tag like the DDG does?

Here are my reasons why I think we should be able to.

1. It would not screw up the scores for the year end winner.
Why? Because our scores are taken from official tag rounds only,
it's not what you come in with, instead it's what you leave with.
Their is nothing to keep track of so it can't mess up the scoring?

2. I think it would add stiffer competition by getting more people
out there (not that there's problem with that) and would probably
have a closer finish.

3. I also believe that the top 1-10 tags would be played more often
at official tag rounds because it would change hands more throughout
the week.

4. Many sedgley folks don't travel to tourneys, so quite often there
aren't even 7 segleyites at any given tournament. At the very least
we should still be able to put the tags up between the 2-6 players
that are out there. (Refer to reason #1)

What are your thoughts for or against and why?
Would it really mess up the scoring, how?

I would like to try to get this rule changed before the new season
starts, So long as it doens't mess the tag Zsar up.

Thank you, MikeM





Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:54 am

m8ymerc1
Offline Offline

Forward
Message #3023 of 3268 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

What do you think about being able to play each other for each others particular tag like the DDG does? Here are my reasons why I think we should be able to. ...
m8ymerc1
Offline
Oct 30, 2007
4:54 am

If all you're contending to play for is what tag you get to enter with it doesn't seem like the rule you want to adjust. Your assumption that it won't "mess up...
pwharton1@...
pauwharton
Offline Send Email
Oct 30, 2007
11:47 am

I don't want to lower the number of players for an official tag round, 7 is just fine. I think you miss understood what I was proposing. 1. Their would be no...
m8ymerc1
Offline
Oct 30, 2007
10:48 pm

I don't want to lower the number of players for an official tag round, 7 is just fine. I think you miss understood what I was proposing. 1. Their would be no...
pwharton1@...
pauwharton
Offline Send Email
Oct 30, 2007
11:33 pm

I'm interested to know when the rule was changed so that you COULD NOT play one on one for a tag. That's how the tags began, what, 12 years ago. It was...
vze4sgv2
Offline
Oct 31, 2007
12:14 am

Who are you? ... From: vze4sgv2 <no_reply@yahoogroups.com> I'm interested to know when the rule was changed so that you COULD NOT play one on one for a tag....
pwharton1@...
pauwharton
Offline Send Email
Oct 31, 2007
9:38 am

I just think he needs to get a job! ... From: To: FiendsofSedgleyWoods@yahoogroups.com Sent: 10/31/2007 4:38:04 AM Subject: Re: [Fiends] Playing for tags in a...
golferx@...
geoforce1
Offline Send Email
Oct 31, 2007
1:13 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help