Hey Velodrome Fans!
It was just a few weeks ago that politics got in the way of track
cycling in
Kidding aside, politics, especially local municipal politics
do affect cyclists, including competitive riders and race fans. That is why we
must work the system well if we want racing to be part of our City cycling
culture and have any hope for improved facilities like the cycling park we have
been dreaming about (with space for a velodrome). You may have read that the 2008
Bicycle Plan Revision was recently adopted by City Council, and included was mention
of the velodrome (yea!) and suggested the creation of a citizen’s Bicycle
Advisory Committee, which was approved. Two public meetings (11/18 and 11/24)
will hopefully answer questions and give citizens a chance to ask to be
included in the committee makeup. See http://fcgov.com/news/index.php?id=2628
. We need an advocate for competitive cycling facilities and programming on
that committee. Please plan to attend at least one of those meetings and let
your voice be heard!
This is crucial because my initial conversation with DK Kemp
lead me to believe that the “powers that be” do not consider competitive
cyclists (and all fitness junkies on bikes with heart rate monitors) an
important or large enough group to deserve being specifically represented by even
1/15th of this committee. Of course I disagree and hope you do
too. As we all know, competitive cycling makes lean healthy bodies better than
many other types of cycling, and can be a lifelong cultural activity that’s
just what the Surgeon General should order. A function of our being represented
on this committee could be to influence some changes in the language of the current
“final?” draft of the Parks Policy Plan Revision which will be
adopted in 2009. It does seem to favor considering a “cycling park”
(maybe we will finally get a closed criterium course, some permanent cyclocross
terrain, and maybe even an MTB short track), but it is quite negative about a
velodrome in its current draft form. See http://fcgov.com/parkplanning/pdf/FortCollins-PolicyPlan-Oct2008-Final.pdf
particularly page 78. I have to say that it is not in keeping with the
spirit of UniverCity Connections, and indicates a misunderstanding of what the
FCVA is asking the City for (i.e. a concession of some parks land for a
privately funded non-profit community velodrome).
Stay tuned and see you at the BAC meetings!
Tim Anderson