Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
DODGERS · LOS ANGELES DODGERS BASEBALL
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 41154 - 41175 of 41175   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Messages: Show Message Summaries   (Group by Topic) Sort by Date v  
#41175 From: Kristin <prettyrose33@...>
Date: Wed Dec 9, 2009 8:31 pm
Subject: Wolfie's Gone
prettyrose33
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
  He has just signed a three year deal with the Brewers for 29.75 Million with a fourth year option.  No surprise here as I knew the Dodgers weren't going to resign him.  I wish Randy the best of luck and will add him to my ex Dodger last next season.
 
Kristin

 
"When we win, Im so happy I eat a lot. When we lose, Im so depressed I eat a lot. When we are rained out, Im so disappointed I eat a lot."-Thomas Charles Lasorda


#41174 From: Kristin <prettyrose33@...>
Date: Fri Dec 4, 2009 7:57 pm
Subject: Re: Some Dodger News
prettyrose33
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
  If I remember right, he didn't pay any cash for the team and is making payments. 
 
Kristin
 
"When we win, Im so happy I eat a lot. When we lose, Im so depressed I eat a lot. When we are rained out, Im so disappointed I eat a lot."-Thomas Charles Lasorda



From: Matt Rogina <midnightdreamer707@...>
To: DODGERS@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, December 4, 2009 12:42:13 AM
Subject: Re: [DODGERS] Some Dodger News

 

I assume the number is accurate as he would have to share his financial records wih the court.  That being said, I am sure he has many millions tied up in CDs, stocks, etc. 

On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Stacey Falero <stacyfalero@ sbcglobal. net> wrote:
 

Great post Matt.....as far as McCourt being "broke"....what are you gonna do? Go into divorce procedings bragging about how much you have....or how much you don't have to be able to keep more of what you do have? 

--- On Thu, 12/3/09, Matt Rogina <midnightdreamer707@ gmail.com> wrote:
Date: Thursday, December 3, 2009, 12:58 PM


 
According to court records, Frank McCourt said he only has 167k in his checking account, give or take a DirecTV bill.
 
That being said, team sources say, the baseball operations end of the ballclub is proceeding as normal. No ownership directives to cut payroll. No warnings to stay off free agents.
 
Dodgers considered a long shot at getting Roy Halladay due to he fact they are unwilling to include Kershaw or Etier.  Any deal would likely have to include Billingsley and Martin.
 
Scuatro interested in Dodgers.  I like this idea.
Dodgers not interested in Lackey.
 
Don Mattingly interested in managing Dodgers in 2011.  This explains why he turned down opportunities up ntil now.
 
More rumblings of a Sherill for Jackson trade with Detroit.  I like Jackson and didn't want to see him go in the first place. I like Sherill too.  Both have similar salaries.  In the end, Sherill is more replaceable.
 
Any thoughts?




#41173 From: Matt Rogina <midnightdreamer707@...>
Date: Fri Dec 4, 2009 8:42 am
Subject: Re: Some Dodger News
midnightdrea...
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email
 
I assume the number is accurate as he would have to share his financial records wih the court.  That being said, I am sure he has many millions tied up in CDs, stocks, etc. 

On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Stacey Falero <stacyfalero@...> wrote:
 

Great post Matt.....as far as McCourt being "broke"....what are you gonna do? Go into divorce procedings bragging about how much you have....or how much you don't have to be able to keep more of what you do have? 

--- On Thu, 12/3/09, Matt Rogina <midnightdreamer707@...> wrote:
Date: Thursday, December 3, 2009, 12:58 PM


 
According to court records, Frank McCourt said he only has 167k in his checking account, give or take a DirecTV bill.
 
That being said, team sources say, the baseball operations end of the ballclub is proceeding as normal. No ownership directives to cut payroll. No warnings to stay off free agents.
 
Dodgers considered a long shot at getting Roy Halladay due to he fact they are unwilling to include Kershaw or Etier.  Any deal would likely have to include Billingsley and Martin.
 
Scuatro interested in Dodgers.  I like this idea.
Dodgers not interested in Lackey.
 
Don Mattingly interested in managing Dodgers in 2011.  This explains why he turned down opportunities up ntil now.
 
More rumblings of a Sherill for Jackson trade with Detroit.  I like Jackson and didn't want to see him go in the first place. I like Sherill too.  Both have similar salaries.  In the end, Sherill is more replaceable.
 
Any thoughts?



#41172 From: Kristin <prettyrose33@...>
Date: Fri Dec 4, 2009 3:42 am
Subject: Re: Some Dodger News
prettyrose33
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
  I think that's Frank's personal account, not the Dodger team account.  Frank draws a salary from the team as does or did Jamie.  Also, when you hear of people like the Gosselin's having 12 accounts, I am sure Frank has more than one, as does Jamie.
 
Kristin

 
"When we win, Im so happy I eat a lot. When we lose, Im so depressed I eat a lot. When we are rained out, Im so disappointed I eat a lot."-Thomas Charles Lasorda



From: Stacey Falero <stacyfalero@...>
To: DODGERS@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, December 3, 2009 6:45:42 PM
Subject: Re: [DODGERS] Some Dodger News

 

Great post Matt.....as far as McCourt being "broke"....what are you gonna do? Go into divorce procedings bragging about how much you have....or how much you don't have to be able to keep more of what you do have? 

--- On Thu, 12/3/09, Matt Rogina <midnightdreamer707@ gmail.com> wrote:

From: Matt Rogina <midnightdreamer707@ gmail.com>
Subject: [DODGERS] Some Dodger News
To: dodgersbigblueclub@ yahoogroups. com, dodgerbaseball@ yahoogroups. com, dodgers@yahoogroups .com, dodgernation@ yahoogroups. com, dodgerbigblueclub@ yahoogroups. com
Date: Thursday, December 3, 2009, 12:58 PM

 
According to court records, Frank McCourt said he only has 167k in his checking account, give or take a DirecTV bill.
 
That being said, team sources say, the baseball operations end of the ballclub is proceeding as normal. No ownership directives to cut payroll. No warnings to stay off free agents.
 
Dodgers considered a long shot at getting Roy Halladay due to he fact they are unwilling to include Kershaw or Etier.  Any deal would likely have to include Billingsley and Martin.
 
Scuatro interested in Dodgers.  I like this idea.
Dodgers not interested in Lackey.
 
Don Mattingly interested in managing Dodgers in 2011.  This explains why he turned down opportunities up ntil now.
 
More rumblings of a Sherill for Jackson trade with Detroit.  I like Jackson and didn't want to see him go in the first place. I like Sherill too.  Both have similar salaries.  In the end, Sherill is more replaceable.
 
Any thoughts?



#41171 From: Stacey Falero <stacyfalero@...>
Date: Fri Dec 4, 2009 2:45 am
Subject: Re: Some Dodger News
dodgerfansta...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Great post Matt.....as far as McCourt being "broke"....what are you gonna do? Go into divorce procedings bragging about how much you have....or how much you don't have to be able to keep more of what you do have? 

--- On Thu, 12/3/09, Matt Rogina <midnightdreamer707@...> wrote:

From: Matt Rogina <midnightdreamer707@...>
Subject: [DODGERS] Some Dodger News
To: dodgersbigblueclub@yahoogroups.com, dodgerbaseball@yahoogroups.com, dodgers@yahoogroups.com, dodgernation@yahoogroups.com, dodgerbigblueclub@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, December 3, 2009, 12:58 PM

 
According to court records, Frank McCourt said he only has 167k in his checking account, give or take a DirecTV bill.
 
That being said, team sources say, the baseball operations end of the ballclub is proceeding as normal. No ownership directives to cut payroll. No warnings to stay off free agents.
 
Dodgers considered a long shot at getting Roy Halladay due to he fact they are unwilling to include Kershaw or Etier.  Any deal would likely have to include Billingsley and Martin.
 
Scuatro interested in Dodgers.  I like this idea.
Dodgers not interested in Lackey.
 
Don Mattingly interested in managing Dodgers in 2011.  This explains why he turned down opportunities up ntil now.
 
More rumblings of a Sherill for Jackson trade with Detroit.  I like Jackson and didn't want to see him go in the first place. I like Sherill too.  Both have similar salaries.  In the end, Sherill is more replaceable.
 
Any thoughts?

#41170 From: Matt Rogina <midnightdreamer707@...>
Date: Thu Dec 3, 2009 8:45 pm
Subject: Re: Some Dodger News
midnightdrea...
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email
 
I like Scutaro.  He did well playing full time last year.  He (or his agent I should say) says its between Boston and Dodgers.  I would rather have Belliard on the bench.

On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:15 AM, JayRod <jay_u_ez@...> wrote:
 

Fank and I are very similar...I have $167 in my checking account!  :)
 
DO NOT get rid of Ethier or Kershaw!  And keep Billingsley!  I do feel that Martin is expendable. 
 
Scurto is a good off the bench player.  He played alot this past year, is he willing to go back to being a utility player?
 
Keep Lackey, Angels. 
 
I'd have to kick around the idea of Mattingly...
 
I'd rather have Sherill.  A quality closer is hard to come by.  The Dodger starting rotation, lead by Kershaw & Billingsley is a good foundation.  Offer a contract to Wolf.
 
Go Dodgers!
JayRod

--- On Thu, 12/3/09, Matt Rogina <midnightdreamer707@...> wrote:

From: Matt Rogina <midnightdreamer707@...>
Subject: [DODGERS] Some Dodger News
To: dodgersbigblueclub@yahoogroups.com, dodgerbaseball@yahoogroups.com, dodgers@yahoogroups.com, dodgernation@yahoogroups.com, dodgerbigblueclub@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, December 3, 2009, 10:58 AM


 
According to court records, Frank McCourt said he only has 167k in his checking account, give or take a DirecTV bill.
 
That being said, team sources say, the baseball operations end of the ballclub is proceeding as normal. No ownership directives to cut payroll. No warnings to stay off free agents.
 
Dodgers considered a long shot at getting Roy Halladay due to he fact they are unwilling to include Kershaw or Etier.  Any deal would likely have to include Billingsley and Martin.
 
Scuatro interested in Dodgers.  I like this idea.
Dodgers not interested in Lackey.
 
Don Mattingly interested in managing Dodgers in 2011.  This explains why he turned down opportunities up ntil now.
 
More rumblings of a Sherill for Jackson trade with Detroit.  I like Jackson and didn't want to see him go in the first place. I like Sherill too.  Both have similar salaries.  In the end, Sherill is more replaceable.
 
Any thoughts?



#41169 From: JayRod <jay_u_ez@...>
Date: Thu Dec 3, 2009 7:15 pm
Subject: Re: Some Dodger News
jay_u_ez
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Fank and I are very similar...I have $167 in my checking account!  :)
 
DO NOT get rid of Ethier or Kershaw!  And keep Billingsley!  I do feel that Martin is expendable. 
 
Scurto is a good off the bench player.  He played alot this past year, is he willing to go back to being a utility player?
 
Keep Lackey, Angels. 
 
I'd have to kick around the idea of Mattingly...
 
I'd rather have Sherill.  A quality closer is hard to come by.  The Dodger starting rotation, lead by Kershaw & Billingsley is a good foundation.  Offer a contract to Wolf.
 
Go Dodgers!
JayRod

--- On Thu, 12/3/09, Matt Rogina <midnightdreamer707@...> wrote:

From: Matt Rogina <midnightdreamer707@...>
Subject: [DODGERS] Some Dodger News
To: dodgersbigblueclub@yahoogroups.com, dodgerbaseball@yahoogroups.com, dodgers@yahoogroups.com, dodgernation@yahoogroups.com, dodgerbigblueclub@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, December 3, 2009, 10:58 AM

 
According to court records, Frank McCourt said he only has 167k in his checking account, give or take a DirecTV bill.
 
That being said, team sources say, the baseball operations end of the ballclub is proceeding as normal. No ownership directives to cut payroll. No warnings to stay off free agents.
 
Dodgers considered a long shot at getting Roy Halladay due to he fact they are unwilling to include Kershaw or Etier.  Any deal would likely have to include Billingsley and Martin.
 
Scuatro interested in Dodgers.  I like this idea.
Dodgers not interested in Lackey.
 
Don Mattingly interested in managing Dodgers in 2011.  This explains why he turned down opportunities up ntil now.
 
More rumblings of a Sherill for Jackson trade with Detroit.  I like Jackson and didn't want to see him go in the first place. I like Sherill too.  Both have similar salaries.  In the end, Sherill is more replaceable.
 
Any thoughts?


#41168 From: "prettyrose33" <prettyrose33@...>
Date: Thu Dec 3, 2009 7:05 pm
Subject: Invitiation to join another Dodger Group
prettyrose33
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Here is an invitation for members of this group to join another Dodger group as
well.  We are having good discussions about hot stove issues and the non offer
of arbitration to the Dodger free agents.  Come join us!

Kristin

dodgersbigblueclub-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

#41167 From: Matt Rogina <midnightdreamer707@...>
Date: Thu Dec 3, 2009 6:58 pm
Subject: Some Dodger News
midnightdrea...
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email
 
According to court records, Frank McCourt said he only has 167k in his checking account, give or take a DirecTV bill.
 
That being said, team sources say, the baseball operations end of the ballclub is proceeding as normal. No ownership directives to cut payroll. No warnings to stay off free agents.
 
Dodgers considered a long shot at getting Roy Halladay due to he fact they are unwilling to include Kershaw or Etier.  Any deal would likely have to include Billingsley and Martin.
 
Scuatro interested in Dodgers.  I like this idea.
Dodgers not interested in Lackey.
 
Don Mattingly interested in managing Dodgers in 2011.  This explains why he turned down opportunities up ntil now.
 
More rumblings of a Sherill for Jackson trade with Detroit.  I like Jackson and didn't want to see him go in the first place. I like Sherill too.  Both have similar salaries.  In the end, Sherill is more replaceable.
 
Any thoughts?

#41166 From: Kristin <prettyrose33@...>
Date: Tue Nov 17, 2009 5:16 pm
Subject: Re: AZ
prettyrose33
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
  That would be very nice!  I have a friend that lives down the street from where they train.
 
Kristin

 
"When we win, Im so happy I eat a lot. When we lose, Im so depressed I eat a lot. When we are rained out, Im so disappointed I eat a lot."-Thomas Charles Lasorda



From: w h <retired358@...>
To: DODGERS@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, November 17, 2009 6:44:54 AM
Subject: [DODGERS] AZ

 

I am going to be moving  near their Spring training facilities next summer - so will be able to see them more often after that.



#41165 From: JayRod <jay_u_ez@...>
Date: Tue Nov 17, 2009 3:21 pm
Subject: Re: Arizona Fall League
jay_u_ez
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Very possible.  I usually get to chat with Logan White and see a coach or two.  One year I even was able to chat with Grady Little when he was the manager.  I really look forward to those conversations 'cause it nice to see Dodger management's thought process and the direction they have for the younger players and prospects.
 
Go Dodgers!
JayRod 

--- On Mon, 11/16/09, Paris Bums <dharmabum@...> wrote:

From: Paris Bums <dharmabum@...>
Subject: Re: [DODGERS] Arizona Fall League
To: DODGERS@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 5:41 PM

 
JayRod,

Were you in Arizona at the same time that the MLB GMs were having their meetings in Chicago? I heard Ned being interviewed on XM and he said they were having Dodgers organizational meetings in conjunction with the GM meetings in Chicago. Perhaps that's why there no Dodgers execs to be seen in Arizona.

Bum
could use some of that warm sun

JayRod wrote:

> Well, another AFL trip has come and gone.
>
> I had the opportunity to see Dodger prospects Lambo (OF) and Mitchell (1B). Not seeing them play over a long period (2 or more weeks), I can hardly judge their potiential. Both seemed to have a good approach at the plate and, in the games I saw, fielded flawlessly.
>
> One of the games I saw was at Camelback Ranch, the Dodger's spring training field. They had a table set up to accept 3 & 7 game spring training ticket packages, and spring season tickets. If they are already offered on the website too. Single game tickets go on sale January 9th.
>
> Other than the foul ball I got (got, not caught.; I snagged it as it bounced by) it was really uneventful. In years past I have had the opportunity to see and speak with Dodger executives, baseball HOF'ers, and even some of the AFL Dodger prospects. Not this year. But, I enjoyed the trip and the baseball!
>
> See yaw'all on the hot stove!
>
> Go Dodgers!
> JayRod
>
> ------------ --------- --------- ------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


#41164 From: w h <retired358@...>
Date: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:44 pm
Subject: AZ
retired358
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
I am going to be moving  near their Spring training facilities next summer - so will be able to see them more often after that.


#41163 From: Paris Bums <dharmabum@...>
Date: Tue Nov 17, 2009 1:01 am
Subject: Re: Arizona Fall League
kpd50
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
JayRod,

Were you in Arizona at the same time that the MLB GMs were having their meetings
in Chicago? I heard Ned being interviewed on XM and he said they were having
Dodgers organizational meetings in conjunction with the GM meetings in Chicago.
Perhaps that's why there no Dodgers execs to be seen in Arizona.

Bum
could use some of that warm sun



JayRod wrote:

> Well, another AFL trip has come and gone.
>
> I had the opportunity to see Dodger prospects Lambo (OF) and Mitchell (1B). 
Not seeing them play over a long period (2 or more weeks), I can hardly judge
their potiential.  Both seemed to have a good approach at the plate and, in the
games I saw, fielded flawlessly.
>
> One of the games I saw was at Camelback Ranch, the Dodger's spring training
field.  They had a table set up to accept 3 & 7 game spring training ticket
packages, and spring season tickets.  If they are already offered on the website
too.  Single game tickets go on sale January 9th.
>
> Other than the foul ball I got (got, not caught.; I snagged it as it bounced
by) it was really uneventful.  In years past I have had the opportunity to see
and speak with Dodger executives, baseball HOF'ers, and even some of the AFL
Dodger prospects.  Not this year.  But, I enjoyed the trip and the baseball!
>
> See yaw'all on the hot stove!
>
> Go Dodgers!
> JayRod
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

#41162 From: "JayRod" <jay_u_ez@...>
Date: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:43 pm
Subject: Arizona Fall League
jay_u_ez
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Well, another AFL trip has come and gone.

I had the opportunity to see Dodger prospects Lambo (OF) and Mitchell (1B).  Not
seeing them play over a long period (2 or more weeks), I can hardly judge their
potiential.  Both seemed to have a good approach at the plate and, in the games
I saw, fielded flawlessly.

One of the games I saw was at Camelback Ranch, the Dodger's spring training
field.  They had a table set up to accept 3 & 7 game spring training ticket
packages, and spring season tickets.  If they are already offered on the website
too.  Single game tickets go on sale January 9th.

Other than the foul ball I got (got, not caught.; I snagged it as it bounced by)
it was really uneventful.  In years past I have had the opportunity to see and
speak with Dodger executives, baseball HOF'ers, and even some of the AFL Dodger
prospects.  Not this year.  But, I enjoyed the trip and the baseball!

See yaw'all on the hot stove!

Go Dodgers!
JayRod

#41161 From: Matt Rogina <midnightdreamer707@...>
Date: Thu Nov 12, 2009 12:44 pm
Subject: Re: Cuban to the rescue!!
midnightdrea...
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email
 
I am a Laker fan, but, as my brother says, if you take a knife and cut me in the arm, I bleed Dodger blue.  My next kid, irrelevant of my wife's opinion (or so i say-LoL) will be named Dodger.  If it is a girl, I am amenable to a different name as long as Elysian is part of the name.  I love the Lakers, but I am in love with the Dodgers. 

That being said, I would love to have Cuban as my owner.  He truly loves his team, and as you mention would spend the needed money to put an annual contender on the field.

In regards to the Steinbrenneresqueness he may present, I don't care.  I have stated many times that I do not hate Steinbrenner for spending money.  I hate him because he owns the Evil Empire.  I have contended in these various groups for years that if Steinbrenner owned the Dodgers and spent the money just as freely, that the majority of us would be as supportive as Yankee fans are.  We hate him because he wins and we don't.  If the shoe was on the other foot, which Cuban may provide, we shall see.

It is interesting for a largely hate Cuban to be a potential owner in a rival city.  I had not thought of that before, but it wouldn't negate my support for Cuban as owner.

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Kristin <prettyrose33@...> wrote:
 

 
  Wow a Laker fan who loves Cuban.   I love it!  I thought all Lakers fans didn't like him.  I have a question though, do you or anyone else think that Mr Cuban would change some of the Dodgers traditions?  Now that I am thinking here, I am wondering what traditions I am talking about.  I guess someone like Tommy Lasorda.  Would he still work for the Dodgers?  I don't know...I'm tired.  Someone help me here.
 
Kristin

 
"When we win, Im so happy I eat a lot. When we lose, Im so depressed I eat a lot. When we are rained out, Im so disappointed I eat a lot."-Thomas Charles Lasorda



From: Matt Rogina <midnightdreamer707@...>
To: DODGERS@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, November 11, 2009 2:10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [DODGERS] Cuban to the rescue!!

 

dude, Zoioz, you and I are soooooooooooo on the same page here.  If I ever had a man crush, it is surely on Mark Cuban.  I root for the Mavericks (whenever they aren't playing against the Lakers) just because of him.

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:23 PM, zoioz <zoioz@yahoo. com> wrote:
 

Please, Please let Cuban take over! There isn't any other potential owner that would do more for the fan base than Cuban.

http://www.latimes. com/sports/ la-sp-dodgers- cuban10-2009nov1 0,0,7450454. story





#41160 From: "David" <LADodgerFan@...>
Date: Thu Nov 12, 2009 9:45 am
Subject: Celizic: MLB needs Cuban to breathe new life into game
dirtsr
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
MSN Tracking Image
Celizic: MLB needs Cuban to breathe new life into game
Charismatic NBA owner would be a perfect fit for Dodgers, and fans
 
By Mike Celizic
Updated 1:05 a.m. ET, Thurs., Nov . 12, 2009

The initial news was delightful: Mark Cuban wanted to buy the Dodgers. The follow-up news was depressing: a baseball team isn’t a possession he has to have.

With George Steinbrenner in muted seclusion, baseball has run out of charismatic owners. Look where you may, there’s not a lovable lunatic to be found in an owner’s box anywhere in the game.

Since the beginning of time, larger-than-life owners have been as much a part of baseball as hot dogs and peanuts. From Harry Wright to Col. Jake Ruppert to Connie Mack to Bill Veeck to Charlie Finley to Steinbrenner, the game’s narrative has been as much about the owners as it has been about the players.

No more. As the price of doing business has increased, so has the degree of dullness. Oh, there are plenty of bad owners, but not one who goes out of his way to create headlines. Most of them are as anonymous as bus drivers.

That’s why it was so exciting to hear that Cuban might be back in the hunt for a big-name team after losing out in a bid for the Chicago Cubs. I had thought that he’d be the perfect man to finally drag the Cubs out of their morass of mediocrity — and to inject some front-office drama back into the game. Alas, it didn’t work out that way.

So when his name popped up as a possible bidder for the Dodgers, whose ownership has become a fiercely contested prize in the nasty divorce of owners Frank McCourt and his soon-to-be ex-wife Jamie. The McCourts have showed no interest in selling, but with the property settlement phase of their split yet to come, that could change.

And again, who better to take over than Cuban? OK, maybe someone from Hollywood like Mel Gibson. He’s enough of a lunatic, but he’s more into breeding a baseball team than owning one. And nobody else seems that interested, either.

So it’s back to Cuban, the last man in America who still knows how to own a sports team with panache. If only he’d show a little more interest.

Instead, he addressed the possibility of branching out into baseball by saying, “It’s just one more business opportunity. If it’s the right deal, I’m going to do it. And if not, I’m not.”

In baseball, there’s no such thing as the right deal, at least not with a team that’s worth owning. The price will be too high, the profits too low, the headaches unending.

But if you’re born to own sports teams, none of that matters. It’s in your blood. You have to do it.

I’m hoping that’s how it’s going to be with Cuban, because baseball needs an owner we can hang a headline on, and there just aren’t any prospects out there.

Cuban would immediately be the game’s most interesting owner. He wouldn’t be perfect, not like Steinbrenner was, but to criticize him for that would be like criticizing a grizzly bear for not being more like a T-Rex.

When Steinbrenner was at the peak of his powers 20-30 years ago, no one could match him. He was a bombastic, blustering, browbeating brute, and that was when he was in a good mood.

You’d think someone like that would be as popular as herpes, and that was pretty much the case with people who found themselves in his line of ire. But those were always people who worked for him. With the public, he played the gruff uncle with the heart of gold.

Fans almost universally adored Steinbrenner because he was nice to them and treated underperforming rich guys the way fans think they should be treated — like cockroaches. If the vintage Steinbrenner were around today, in fact, he’d be the guy everybody would want to see riding herd on Wall Street.

No one this side of Vlad the Impaler is going to give us that kind of entertainment, and Vlad is unavailable, having been terminally dead for more than 500 years.

Cuban is not Vlad, nor is he Steinbrenner. He’s got the bluster, charisma, boundless enthusiasm, burning desire to win and the bankroll, but he lacks the mean streak, at least when it comes to is players. He can out-Steinbrenner The Boss, but only when the object of his displeasure is a referee or a league executive.

Players and coaches are a different matter. When he gets in a fight with a coach, as he did with Don Nelson, he hands it over to his lawyers. And if he has ever been furious at a player, he keeps it private. Instead of beating the players up, even when they fail to meet expectations, he buys them a new luxury airplane or installs bigger flat-screen televisions in their lounge.

Still, he’d be a breath of fresh air. And if he didn’t browbeat the hired help, he’d at least tee off on the umpires and league executives until commissioner Bud Selig was praying for the good old days when the only thing he had to worry about was the next revelation about which superstar was doing steroids.

So, come on, Mark. Quit worrying about making a good investment. Throw a pile of money at the McCourts, and if they won’t bite, make the pile bigger. Baseball needs you.

URL: http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/33873580/ns/sports-baseball/


 
 
FREE Animations for your email - by IncrediMail! Click Here!

#41159 From: Kristin <prettyrose33@...>
Date: Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:42 am
Subject: Re: Cuban to the rescue!!
prettyrose33
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
  Wow a Laker fan who loves Cuban.   I love it!  I thought all Lakers fans didn't like him.  I have a question though, do you or anyone else think that Mr Cuban would change some of the Dodgers traditions?  Now that I am thinking here, I am wondering what traditions I am talking about.  I guess someone like Tommy Lasorda.  Would he still work for the Dodgers?  I don't know...I'm tired.  Someone help me here.
 
Kristin

 
"When we win, Im so happy I eat a lot. When we lose, Im so depressed I eat a lot. When we are rained out, Im so disappointed I eat a lot."-Thomas Charles Lasorda



From: Matt Rogina <midnightdreamer707@...>
To: DODGERS@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, November 11, 2009 2:10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [DODGERS] Cuban to the rescue!!

 

dude, Zoioz, you and I are soooooooooooo on the same page here.  If I ever had a man crush, it is surely on Mark Cuban.  I root for the Mavericks (whenever they aren't playing against the Lakers) just because of him.

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:23 PM, zoioz <zoioz@yahoo. com> wrote:
 

Please, Please let Cuban take over! There isn't any other potential owner that would do more for the fan base than Cuban.

http://www.latimes. com/sports/ la-sp-dodgers- cuban10-2009nov1 0,0,7450454. story




#41158 From: Kristin <prettyrose33@...>
Date: Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:27 am
Subject: Re: Cuban to the rescue!!
prettyrose33
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
  For me, I am torn.  I know that Laker Nation doesn't care much for Cuban.  I know that he can be a big mouth and could change the wonderful Dodger tradition really quick but he will also spend money.  He will get the players that are needed to win a Championship but this could end up being like George Steinbrenner on the West Coast.  A meddling owner but someone who will spend to get a winner.  I don't know and if the Lakers had a say in having to share LA with an owner that they don't like (I don't know if they do have any say since it's a different sport).  I really can't see it happening but the idea is intriguing.
 
Kristin

 
"When we win, Im so happy I eat a lot. When we lose, Im so depressed I eat a lot. When we are rained out, Im so disappointed I eat a lot."-Thomas Charles Lasorda



From: zoioz <zoioz@...>
To: DODGERS@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, November 10, 2009 3:23:52 PM
Subject: [DODGERS] Cuban to the rescue!!

 

Please, Please let Cuban take over! There isn't any other potential owner that would do more for the fan base than Cuban.

http://www.latimes. com/sports/ la-sp-dodgers- cuban10-2009nov1 0,0,7450454. story



#41157 From: Blacky Bond <dharmabum@...>
Date: Thu Nov 12, 2009 12:24 am
Subject: Gold
kpd50
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Congrats to Hudson and Kemp on being awarded Gold Gloves!!

Bum

#41156 From: Matt Rogina <midnightdreamer707@...>
Date: Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:00 am
Subject: Re: Re: Cuban to the rescue!!
midnightdrea...
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email
 
Thats a very good point.  That is exactly why I love Mark Cuban so much.  Because he truly loves his team and is willing to speak his mind.  Zoioz, do you think owners would reconsider Cuban as owner now that it is more desirous to sell the team?

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:56 PM, zoioz <zoioz@...> wrote:
 

Actually, the baseball owners' hesitation to approve Cuban is due to the fact that they know Cuban would make them all look bad to their own fan base. That's why they liked McCourt in the first place. McCourt is someone they can control to not step out of bounds and challenge the conventional wisdom.



--- In DODGERS@yahoogroups.com, Matt Rogina <midnightdreamer707@...> wrote:
>
> That was when he was being investigated by the SEC, of which he was
> cleared. Also, the Dodgers are a higher neccesity to sell in MLB's eyes,
> imo.
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:58 PM, David <LADodgerFan@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > *Considering the MLB owners response to Cuban's interest in buying the
> > Cubs, I doubt there would be much receptivity to his desire for the
> > Dodgers. *
> >
> > *David ... Palm Bay, F-L-A*
> > **
> > *-------Original Message-------*
> >
> > *From:* zoioz <zoioz@...>

> > *Date:* 11/10/09 18:24:10
> > *To:* DODGERS@yahoogroups.com
> > *Subject:* [DODGERS] Cuban to the rescue!!
> >
> > Please, Please let Cuban take over! There isn't any other potential owner
> > that would do more for the fan base than Cuban.
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-dodgers-cuban10-2009nov10,0,7450454.story
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [image: FREE Animations for your email - by IncrediMail! Click Here!]<http://www.incredimail.com/index.asp?id=109095&rui=51045138>
> >
> >
>



#41155 From: "zoioz" <zoioz@...>
Date: Thu Nov 12, 2009 12:24 am
Subject: Re: new from Howard
zoioz
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
I'm not understanding your #8 point.  If anything, the Yanks proved that having
an ace is a must to have post season success.  At the very least, it increases
your odds tremendously.  CC's ability to start on 3 days rest and not blow up
like the rest of the also ran pitchers is why he's an ace.  Cliff Lee, the best
arm this post season, went home without a trophy because Phils have nobody else
they can start.

At any rate, I'm ready for a Billingsly+Broxton for Halladay swap.  I'm pretty
sure either Sherrill or Kuo would make comparable closers as Broxton.  Another
pitcher I'd like to gamble on is Wang.  He would be a good buy low guy.




--- In DODGERS@yahoogroups.com, onbaseball@... wrote:
>
>
> Top Ten Reasons it's Good the Yankees Won the World Series.
> _www.BaseballSavvy.com_ (http://www.BaseballSavvy.com) .
>

#41154 From: "zoioz" <zoioz@...>
Date: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:56 pm
Subject: Re: Cuban to the rescue!!
zoioz
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Actually, the baseball owners' hesitation to approve Cuban is due to the fact
that they know Cuban would make them all look bad to their own fan base.  That's
why they liked McCourt in the first place.  McCourt is someone they can control
to not step out of bounds and challenge the conventional wisdom.




--- In DODGERS@yahoogroups.com, Matt Rogina <midnightdreamer707@...> wrote:
>
> That was when he was being investigated by the SEC, of which he was
> cleared.  Also, the Dodgers are a higher neccesity to sell in MLB's eyes,
> imo.
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:58 PM, David <LADodgerFan@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >   *Considering the MLB owners response to Cuban's interest in buying the
> > Cubs, I doubt there would be much receptivity to his desire for the
> > Dodgers. *
> >
> >  *David ... Palm Bay, F-L-A*
> > **
> > *-------Original Message-------*
> >
> >  *From:* zoioz <zoioz@...>
> > *Date:* 11/10/09 18:24:10
> > *To:* DODGERS@yahoogroups.com
> > *Subject:* [DODGERS] Cuban to the rescue!!
> >
> > Please, Please let Cuban take over!  There isn't any other potential owner
> > that would do more for the fan base than Cuban.
> >
> >
> >
> >
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-dodgers-cuban10-2009nov10,0,7450454.story
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     [image: FREE Animations for your email - by IncrediMail! Click
Here!]<http://www.incredimail.com/index.asp?id=109095&rui=51045138>
> >
> >
>

Messages 41154 - 41175 of 41175   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help