We should of had Taylor in Jan but the board dithered over 250k.  If we had
offered 1 million straight away he would be ours now, and Edurado would not
be walking like Heather Mills!
 
-----Original Message-----
From: CN@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CN@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of mls11x
Sent: 28 April 2008 14:55
To: CN@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CN] Re: Result: City 3-0 QPR (Evans, Fotheringham, Russell)



This board backed Worthington to the hilt and it paid off when we
went up, but backfired when he didn't invest wisely for our
Premiership season. They then backed Grant, but many of his signings
failed to produce. And they have fully back Roeder, according to the
man himself, so I don't fully buy this argument. The club have
invested on the pitch wherever and whenever they could. Don't forget
it was Roeder that decided not to buy in January, not the board.

That said, it will - as always - be interesting to see how things
develop over the summer. Whether Roeder will be given a transfer
fund large enough to replenish the team with high quality permanent
signings, or just look to top up the squad and rely again on long-
term loans for the quality.

The key to that is, undoubtedly, more to do with the Turners than
the Smith & Jones, given their relative wealth. Only time will tell,
but I don't expect the Club to announce a huge transfer fund and
ambitions to challenge for the title - even if the Turners do pour
in a load of money! Let's keep our negotiating position underwraps
as long as possible or Roeder will be asked stupid money for
everyone anyway. And he just won't pay it! MLS

--- In HYPERLINK "mailto:CN%40yahoogroups.com"CN@yahoogroups.-com, "Brian
Burrell" <bwburrell@.-..> wrote:
>
> So its all down to seeing how much this board is going to back the
manager in the summer or will he get poached? Will the Turners move
on to greener grass and take their £2mil with them? Will the club
being installing nappy changing at Carrow Rd for next seasons loan
players? Will we let Hucks go then waste money trying to replace
him? This summer will be like a window on NCFC for the next 5 years,
if the board really invest in the team "on the pitch" or continue to
look "off the pitch" and enhance their NCPLC image?
> It will be a very long interesting summer?
> Brian
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: mls11x
> To: HYPERLINK "mailto:CN%40yahoogroups.com"CN@yahoogroups.-com
> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 2:05 AM
> Subject: [CN] Result: City 3-0 QPR (Evans, Fotheringham, Russell)
>
>
> City final moved themselves clear of the threat of relegation
with a
> game to spare after a very one-sided victory against ten-man QPR
at
> Carrow Road on Saturday.
>
> City got off to a flying start and looked set to take a deserved
lead
> in the opening few minutes when Ched Evans raced through, only
to be
> shoved in the back on the edge of the box by Damion Stewart. The
push
> was enough to put Ched off his shot before the ex City loan
keeper Lee
> Camp took him out with a complete body check.
>
> The keeper escaped punishment, but Stewart was given a straight
red,
> and City took full advantage. Although the resulting freekick
came to
> nothing, City kept the pressure on, forcing a corner and Huckerby
> eventually crossed to Cureton who pulled the ball back to Evans,
via a
> defender, and Evans volleyed home from the edge of the box.
>
> City attacked in waves and could, indeed should, have added a
hat-full
> to their early advantage, but some wasteful finishing, good
> goalkeeping and the woodwork combined to keep the scoreline down
to a
> nail-biting 1-0.
>
> The second half continued in the same vein, but it took a slice
of
> luck for City to finally double their advantage when the ball
bounced
> out to Fotheringham, twenty yards from goal. He took a touch and
fired
> goal-wards, but his shot clipped a defender's heal to wrong-foot
Camp
> and crawl into the net.
>
> Fotheringham almost got his second when the QPR defence went
missing
> and Lee Camp took on a sweeper role, but with the keeper stranded
> outside the box, Fotheringham'-s attempt at an open goal dropped
just
> the wrong side of the post.
>
> It didn't take long, however, for an almost identical piece of
> goalkeeping to present City with another chance. This time
Chadwick
> and Dion closed down the keeper, who had again strayed way
outside his
> box, the ball bobbled free as Camp threw himself into one rash
> challenge after another until Russell kept his head, and his
footing,
> to fire into the unguarded net.
>
> There seemed to be a concerted effort to set up Dion for a
farewell
> goal, although Cureton had spent the entire game on a solo
mission to
> collect his 200th professional goal, much to the frustration of
some
> of his colleagues at tines.
>
> The futures of one City player was made a lot clearer as the team
> completed its lap of honour - Hucks hanging way back, with Dion,
to
> milk the applause one last time, perhaps?
>
> So another year of Championship football to look forward to! MLS
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.5/1399 - Release Date: 26/04/2008
14:17



No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.5/1399 - Release Date: 26/04/2008
14:17



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

The board budgeted for relegation when we went up and that ultimately led to us
going down for the sake of winning one more game and that starting with Doc up
front. The board said later they didn't get a real striker until the money came
in from Sky. So judge the board on their ambition or what ever you like.
As for the Turners? They still have to prove to the fans that their seats on the
board are more than just an ego trip that they will walk away from taking their
loan in the near future.
I don't think 8 or 9 loan player are the future for the club, 3 maybe but any
more you have no stability in the team.

As I said the long term football future of the club will be decided in the next
3 months and I wonder if we will ever lose the poor little Norwich tag as long
as the person who gave it to us is still on the board?
Brian

   ----- Original Message -----
   From: mls11x
   To: CN@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 2:55 PM
   Subject: [CN] Re: Result: City 3-0 QPR (Evans, Fotheringham, Russell)


   This board backed Worthington to the hilt and it paid off when we
   went up, but backfired when he didn't invest wisely for our
   Premiership season. They then backed Grant, but many of his signings
   failed to produce. And they have fully back Roeder, according to the
   man himself, so I don't fully buy this argument. The club have
   invested on the pitch wherever and whenever they could. Don't forget
   it was Roeder that decided not to buy in January, not the board.

   That said, it will - as always - be interesting to see how things
   develop over the summer. Whether Roeder will be given a transfer
   fund large enough to replenish the team with high quality permanent
   signings, or just look to top up the squad and rely again on long-
   term loans for the quality.

   The key to that is, undoubtedly, more to do with the Turners than
   the Smith & Jones, given their relative wealth. Only time will tell,
   but I don't expect the Club to announce a huge transfer fund and
   ambitions to challenge for the title - even if the Turners do pour
   in a load of money! Let's keep our negotiating position underwraps
   as long as possible or Roeder will be asked stupid money for
   everyone anyway. And he just won't pay it! MLS

   --- In CN@yahoogroups.com, "Brian Burrell" <bwburrell@...> wrote:
   >
   > So its all down to seeing how much this board is going to back the
   manager in the summer or will he get poached? Will the Turners move
   on to greener grass and take their £2mil with them? Will the club
   being installing nappy changing at Carrow Rd for next seasons loan
   players? Will we let Hucks go then waste money trying to replace
   him? This summer will be like a window on NCFC for the next 5 years,
   if the board really invest in the team "on the pitch" or continue to
   look "off the pitch" and enhance their NCPLC image?
   > It will be a very long interesting summer?
   > Brian
   > ----- Original Message -----
   > From: mls11x
   > To: CN@yahoogroups.com
   > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 2:05 AM
   > Subject: [CN] Result: City 3-0 QPR (Evans, Fotheringham, Russell)
   >
   >
   > City final moved themselves clear of the threat of relegation
   with a
   > game to spare after a very one-sided victory against ten-man QPR
   at
   > Carrow Road on Saturday.
   >
   > City got off to a flying start and looked set to take a deserved
   lead
   > in the opening few minutes when Ched Evans raced through, only
   to be
   > shoved in the back on the edge of the box by Damion Stewart. The
   push
   > was enough to put Ched off his shot before the ex City loan
   keeper Lee
   > Camp took him out with a complete body check.
   >
   > The keeper escaped punishment, but Stewart was given a straight
   red,
   > and City took full advantage. Although the resulting freekick
   came to
   > nothing, City kept the pressure on, forcing a corner and Huckerby
   > eventually crossed to Cureton who pulled the ball back to Evans,
   via a
   > defender, and Evans volleyed home from the edge of the box.
   >
   > City attacked in waves and could, indeed should, have added a
   hat-full
   > to their early advantage, but some wasteful finishing, good
   > goalkeeping and the woodwork combined to keep the scoreline down
   to a
   > nail-biting 1-0.
   >
   > The second half continued in the same vein, but it took a slice
   of
   > luck for City to finally double their advantage when the ball
   bounced
   > out to Fotheringham, twenty yards from goal. He took a touch and
   fired
   > goal-wards, but his shot clipped a defender's heal to wrong-foot
   Camp
   > and crawl into the net.
   >
   > Fotheringham almost got his second when the QPR defence went
   missing
   > and Lee Camp took on a sweeper role, but with the keeper stranded
   > outside the box, Fotheringham's attempt at an open goal dropped
   just
   > the wrong side of the post.
   >
   > It didn't take long, however, for an almost identical piece of
   > goalkeeping to present City with another chance. This time
   Chadwick
   > and Dion closed down the keeper, who had again strayed way
   outside his
   > box, the ball bobbled free as Camp threw himself into one rash
   > challenge after another until Russell kept his head, and his
   footing,
   > to fire into the unguarded net.
   >
   > There seemed to be a concerted effort to set up Dion for a
   farewell
   > goal, although Cureton had spent the entire game on a solo
   mission to
   > collect his 200th professional goal, much to the frustration of
   some
   > of his colleagues at tines.
   >
   > The futures of one City player was made a lot clearer as the team
   > completed its lap of honour - Hucks hanging way back, with Dion,
   to
   > milk the applause one last time, perhaps?
   >
   > So another year of Championship football to look forward to! MLS
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
   >





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

1) If they had give Worthington the money for a top or even half top class
striker, we may well have stayed up - insted, we get The Doc, as a panic buy!

2) The club brought in Grant cos he was cheap and then felt they had to back
him, purley because it was them brining him in, and to compensate fr that trash
Worthington got.

3) They have 'backed' up Glenn - but only cos he dont want a lot of money - and
thats something we DO need to push again! So, its not exactly thumbs up and 100%
praise to the board there!

4) If all we get is loan players next season - its again another 'always next
year' season, and a waste of money, time and effort!

5) No money to spend = end of this board!

6)




To: CN@...: mls11x@...: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:55:00
+0000Subject: [CN] Re: Result: City 3-0 QPR (Evans, Fotheringham, Russell)




This board backed Worthington to the hilt and it paid off when we went up, but
backfired when he didn't invest wisely for our Premiership season. They then
backed Grant, but many of his signings failed to produce. And they have fully
back Roeder, according to the man himself, so I don't fully buy this argument.
The club have invested on the pitch wherever and whenever they could. Don't
forget it was Roeder that decided not to buy in January, not the board.That
said, it will - as always - be interesting to see how things develop over the
summer. Whether Roeder will be given a transfer fund large enough to replenish
the team with high quality permanent signings, or just look to top up the squad
and rely again on long-term loans for the quality.The key to that is,
undoubtedly, more to do with the Turners than the Smith & Jones, given their
relative wealth. Only time will tell, but I don't expect the Club to announce a
huge transfer fund and ambitions to challenge for the title - even if the
Turners do pour in a load of money! Let's keep our negotiating position
underwraps as long as possible or Roeder will be asked stupid money for everyone
anyway. And he just won't pay it! MLS--- In CN@yahoogroups.com, "Brian Burrell"
<bwburrell@...> wrote:>> So its all down to seeing how much this board is going
to back the manager in the summer or will he get poached? Will the Turners move
on to greener grass and take their £2mil with them? Will the club being
installing nappy changing at Carrow Rd for next seasons loan players? Will we
let Hucks go then waste money trying to replace him? This summer will be like a
window on NCFC for the next 5 years, if the board really invest in the team "on
the pitch" or continue to look "off the pitch" and enhance their NCPLC image?>
It will be a very long interesting summer?> Brian> ----- Original Message -----
> From: mls11x > To: CN@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 2:05 AM>
Subject: [CN] Result: City 3-0 QPR (Evans, Fotheringham, Russell)> > > City
final moved themselves clear of the threat of relegation with a> game to spare
after a very one-sided victory against ten-man QPR at> Carrow Road on Saturday.>
> City got off to a flying start and looked set to take a deserved lead> in the
opening few minutes when Ched Evans raced through, only to be> shoved in the
back on the edge of the box by Damion Stewart. The push> was enough to put Ched
off his shot before the ex City loan keeper Lee> Camp took him out with a
complete body check.> > The keeper escaped punishment, but Stewart was given a
straight red,> and City took full advantage. Although the resulting freekick
came to> nothing, City kept the pressure on, forcing a corner and Huckerby>
eventually crossed to Cureton who pulled the ball back to Evans, via a>
defender, and Evans volleyed home from the edge of the box.> > City attacked in
waves and could, indeed should, have added a hat-full> to their early advantage,
but some wasteful finishing, good> goalkeeping and the woodwork combined to keep
the scoreline down to a> nail-biting 1-0.> > The second half continued in the
same vein, but it took a slice of> luck for City to finally double their
advantage when the ball bounced> out to Fotheringham, twenty yards from goal. He
took a touch and fired> goal-wards, but his shot clipped a defender's heal to
wrong-foot Camp> and crawl into the net.> > Fotheringham almost got his second
when the QPR defence went missing> and Lee Camp took on a sweeper role, but with
the keeper stranded> outside the box, Fotheringham's attempt at an open goal
dropped just> the wrong side of the post.> > It didn't take long, however, for
an almost identical piece of> goalkeeping to present City with another chance.
This time Chadwick> and Dion closed down the keeper, who had again strayed way
outside his> box, the ball bobbled free as Camp threw himself into one rash>
challenge after another until Russell kept his head, and his footing,> to fire
into the unguarded net.> > There seemed to be a concerted effort to set up Dion
for a farewell> goal, although Cureton had spent the entire game on a solo
mission to> collect his 200th professional goal, much to the frustration of
some> of his colleagues at tines.> > The futures of one City player was made a
lot clearer as the team> completed its lap of honour - Hucks hanging way back,
with Dion, to> milk the applause one last time, perhaps?> > So another year of
Championship football to look forward to! MLS> > > > > > [Non-text portions of
this message have been removed]>






_________________________________________________________________
Bag extra points with the Walkers Brit Trip Game
http://www.walkersbrittrips.co.uk/game

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

This board backed Worthington to the hilt and it paid off when we
went up, but backfired when he didn't invest wisely for our
Premiership season. They then backed Grant, but many of his signings
failed to produce. And they have fully back Roeder, according to the
man himself, so I don't fully buy this argument. The club have
invested on the pitch wherever and whenever they could. Don't forget
it was Roeder that decided not to buy in January, not the board.

That said, it will - as always - be interesting to see how things
develop over the summer. Whether Roeder will be given a transfer
fund large enough to replenish the team with high quality permanent
signings, or just look to top up the squad and rely again on long-
term loans for the quality.

The key to that is, undoubtedly, more to do with the Turners than
the Smith & Jones, given their relative wealth. Only time will tell,
but I don't expect the Club to announce a huge transfer fund and
ambitions to challenge for the title - even if the Turners do pour
in a load of money! Let's keep our negotiating position underwraps
as long as possible or Roeder will be asked stupid money for
everyone anyway. And he just won't pay it! MLS

--- In CN@yahoogroups.com, "Brian Burrell" <bwburrell@...> wrote:
>
> So its all down to seeing how much this board is going to back the
manager in the summer or will he get poached? Will the Turners move
on to greener grass and take their £2mil with them? Will the club
being installing nappy changing at Carrow Rd for next seasons loan
players? Will we let Hucks go then waste money trying to replace
him? This summer will be like a window on NCFC for the next 5 years,
if the board really invest in the team "on the pitch" or continue to
look "off the pitch" and enhance their NCPLC image?
> It will be a very long interesting summer?
> Brian
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: mls11x
>   To: CN@yahoogroups.com
>   Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 2:05 AM
>   Subject: [CN] Result: City 3-0 QPR (Evans, Fotheringham, Russell)
>
>
>   City final moved themselves clear of the threat of relegation
with a
>   game to spare after a very one-sided victory against ten-man QPR
at
>   Carrow Road on Saturday.
>
>   City got off to a flying start and looked set to take a deserved
lead
>   in the opening few minutes when Ched Evans raced through, only
to be
>   shoved in the back on the edge of the box by Damion Stewart. The
push
>   was enough to put Ched off his shot before the ex City loan
keeper Lee
>   Camp took him out with a complete body check.
>
>   The keeper escaped punishment, but Stewart was given a straight
red,
>   and City took full advantage. Although the resulting freekick
came to
>   nothing, City kept the pressure on, forcing a corner and Huckerby
>   eventually crossed to Cureton who pulled the ball back to Evans,
via a
>   defender, and Evans volleyed home from the edge of the box.
>
>   City attacked in waves and could, indeed should, have added a
hat-full
>   to their early advantage, but some wasteful finishing, good
>   goalkeeping and the woodwork combined to keep the scoreline down
to a
>   nail-biting 1-0.
>
>   The second half continued in the same vein, but it took a slice
of
>   luck for City to finally double their advantage when the ball
bounced
>   out to Fotheringham, twenty yards from goal. He took a touch and
fired
>   goal-wards, but his shot clipped a defender's heal to wrong-foot
Camp
>   and crawl into the net.
>
>   Fotheringham almost got his second when the QPR defence went
missing
>   and Lee Camp took on a sweeper role, but with the keeper stranded
>   outside the box, Fotheringham's attempt at an open goal dropped
just
>   the wrong side of the post.
>
>   It didn't take long, however, for an almost identical piece of
>   goalkeeping to present City with another chance. This time
Chadwick
>   and Dion closed down the keeper, who had again strayed way
outside his
>   box, the ball bobbled free as Camp threw himself into one rash
>   challenge after another until Russell kept his head, and his
footing,
>   to fire into the unguarded net.
>
>   There seemed to be a concerted effort to set up Dion for a
farewell
>   goal, although Cureton had spent the entire game on a solo
mission to
>   collect his 200th professional goal, much to the frustration of
some
>   of his colleagues at tines.
>
>   The futures of one City player was made a lot clearer as the team
>   completed its lap of honour - Hucks hanging way back, with Dion,
to
>   milk the applause one last time, perhaps?
>
>   So another year of Championship football to look forward to! MLS
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Very well said Brian I’m in total agreement with you……………………I can see
everything going Tits Up.

OTBC



From: CN@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CN@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Brian
Burrell
Sent: 28 April 2008 12:19
To: CN@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CN] Result: City 3-0 QPR (Evans, Fotheringham, Russell)



So its all down to seeing how much this board is going to back the manager
in the summer or will he get poached? Will the Turners move on to greener
grass and take their £2mil with them? Will the club being installing nappy
changing at Carrow Rd for next seasons loan players? Will we let Hucks go
then waste money trying to replace him? This summer will be like a window on
NCFC for the next 5 years, if the board really invest in the team "on the
pitch" or continue to look "off the pitch" and enhance their NCPLC image?
It will be a very long interesting summer?
Brian
----- Original Message -----
From: mls11x
To: CN@yahoogroups.com <mailto:CN%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 2:05 AM
Subject: [CN] Result: City 3-0 QPR (Evans, Fotheringham, Russell)

City final moved themselves clear of the threat of relegation with a
game to spare after a very one-sided victory against ten-man QPR at
Carrow Road on Saturday.

City got off to a flying start and looked set to take a deserved lead
in the opening few minutes when Ched Evans raced through, only to be
shoved in the back on the edge of the box by Damion Stewart. The push
was enough to put Ched off his shot before the ex City loan keeper Lee
Camp took him out with a complete body check.

The keeper escaped punishment, but Stewart was given a straight red,
and City took full advantage. Although the resulting freekick came to
nothing, City kept the pressure on, forcing a corner and Huckerby
eventually crossed to Cureton who pulled the ball back to Evans, via a
defender, and Evans volleyed home from the edge of the box.

City attacked in waves and could, indeed should, have added a hat-full
to their early advantage, but some wasteful finishing, good
goalkeeping and the woodwork combined to keep the scoreline down to a
nail-biting 1-0.

The second half continued in the same vein, but it took a slice of
luck for City to finally double their advantage when the ball bounced
out to Fotheringham, twenty yards from goal. He took a touch and fired
goal-wards, but his shot clipped a defender's heal to wrong-foot Camp
and crawl into the net.

Fotheringham almost got his second when the QPR defence went missing
and Lee Camp took on a sweeper role, but with the keeper stranded
outside the box, Fotheringham's attempt at an open goal dropped just
the wrong side of the post.

It didn't take long, however, for an almost identical piece of
goalkeeping to present City with another chance. This time Chadwick
and Dion closed down the keeper, who had again strayed way outside his
box, the ball bobbled free as Camp threw himself into one rash
challenge after another until Russell kept his head, and his footing,
to fire into the unguarded net.

There seemed to be a concerted effort to set up Dion for a farewell
goal, although Cureton had spent the entire game on a solo mission to
collect his 200th professional goal, much to the frustration of some
of his colleagues at tines.

The futures of one City player was made a lot clearer as the team
completed its lap of honour - Hucks hanging way back, with Dion, to
milk the applause one last time, perhaps?

So another year of Championship football to look forward to! MLS

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

So its all down to seeing how much this board is going to back the manager in
the summer or will he get poached? Will the Turners move on to greener grass and
take their £2mil with them? Will the club being installing nappy changing at
Carrow Rd for next seasons loan players? Will we let Hucks go then waste money
trying to replace him? This summer will be like a window on NCFC for the next 5
years, if the board really invest in the team "on the pitch" or continue to look
"off the pitch" and enhance their NCPLC image?
It will be a very long interesting summer?
Brian
   ----- Original Message -----
   From: mls11x
   To: CN@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 2:05 AM
   Subject: [CN] Result: City 3-0 QPR (Evans, Fotheringham, Russell)


   City final moved themselves clear of the threat of relegation with a
   game to spare after a very one-sided victory against ten-man QPR at
   Carrow Road on Saturday.

   City got off to a flying start and looked set to take a deserved lead
   in the opening few minutes when Ched Evans raced through, only to be
   shoved in the back on the edge of the box by Damion Stewart. The push
   was enough to put Ched off his shot before the ex City loan keeper Lee
   Camp took him out with a complete body check.

   The keeper escaped punishment, but Stewart was given a straight red,
   and City took full advantage. Although the resulting freekick came to
   nothing, City kept the pressure on, forcing a corner and Huckerby
   eventually crossed to Cureton who pulled the ball back to Evans, via a
   defender, and Evans volleyed home from the edge of the box.

   City attacked in waves and could, indeed should, have added a hat-full
   to their early advantage, but some wasteful finishing, good
   goalkeeping and the woodwork combined to keep the scoreline down to a
   nail-biting 1-0.

   The second half continued in the same vein, but it took a slice of
   luck for City to finally double their advantage when the ball bounced
   out to Fotheringham, twenty yards from goal. He took a touch and fired
   goal-wards, but his shot clipped a defender's heal to wrong-foot Camp
   and crawl into the net.

   Fotheringham almost got his second when the QPR defence went missing
   and Lee Camp took on a sweeper role, but with the keeper stranded
   outside the box, Fotheringham's attempt at an open goal dropped just
   the wrong side of the post.

   It didn't take long, however, for an almost identical piece of
   goalkeeping to present City with another chance. This time Chadwick
   and Dion closed down the keeper, who had again strayed way outside his
   box, the ball bobbled free as Camp threw himself into one rash
   challenge after another until Russell kept his head, and his footing,
   to fire into the unguarded net.

   There seemed to be a concerted effort to set up Dion for a farewell
   goal, although Cureton had spent the entire game on a solo mission to
   collect his 200th professional goal, much to the frustration of some
   of his colleagues at tines.

   The futures of one City player was made a lot clearer as the team
   completed its lap of honour - Hucks hanging way back, with Dion, to
   milk the applause one last time, perhaps?

   So another year of Championship football to look forward to! MLS





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

City final moved themselves clear of the threat of relegation with a
game to spare after a very one-sided victory against ten-man QPR at
Carrow Road on Saturday.

City got off to a flying start and looked set to take a deserved lead
in the opening few minutes when Ched Evans raced through, only to be
shoved in the back on the edge of the box by Damion Stewart. The push
was enough to put Ched off his shot before the ex City loan keeper Lee
Camp took him out with a complete body check.

The keeper escaped punishment, but Stewart was given a straight red,
and City took full advantage. Although the resulting freekick came to
nothing, City kept the pressure on, forcing a corner and Huckerby
eventually crossed to Cureton who pulled the ball back to Evans, via a
defender, and Evans volleyed home from the edge of the box.

City attacked in waves and could, indeed should, have added a hat-full
to their early advantage, but some wasteful finishing, good
goalkeeping and the woodwork combined to keep the scoreline down to a
nail-biting 1-0.

The second half continued in the same vein, but it took a slice of
luck for City to finally double their advantage when the ball bounced
out to Fotheringham, twenty yards from goal. He took a touch and fired
goal-wards, but his shot clipped a defender's heal to wrong-foot Camp
and crawl into the net.

Fotheringham almost got his second when the QPR defence went missing
and Lee Camp took on a sweeper role, but with the keeper stranded
outside the box, Fotheringham's attempt at an open goal dropped just
the wrong side of the post.

It didn't take long, however, for an almost identical piece of
goalkeeping to present City with another chance. This time Chadwick
and Dion closed down the keeper, who had again strayed way outside his
box, the ball bobbled free as Camp threw himself into one rash
challenge after another until Russell kept his head, and his footing,
to fire into the unguarded net.

There seemed to be a concerted effort to set up Dion for a farewell
goal, although Cureton had spent the entire game on a solo mission to
collect his 200th professional goal, much to the frustration of some
of his colleagues at tines.

The futures of one City player was made a lot clearer as the team
completed its lap of honour - Hucks hanging way back, with Dion, to
milk the applause one last time, perhaps?

So another year of Championship football to look forward to! MLS

LOL
-----Original Message-----
From: CN@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CN@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of ricky
bilverstone
Sent: 25 April 2008 13:15
To: cn@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [CN] Re: scum scum scum scum scum




Maybe he was drinking in his pub?

Oh no, that went bust, didnt it - fat scum t.at!

To: HYPERLINK "mailto:CN%40yahoogroups.comFrom"CN@yahoogroups.-comFrom:
HYPERLINK "mailto:mls11x%40googlemail.comDate"mls11x@googlemail.-comDate:
Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:03:02 +0000Subject: [CN] Re: scum scum scum scum scum

Someone should upload this to U-Tube! MLS--- In HYPERLINK
"mailto:CN%40yahoogroups.com"CN@yahoogroups.-com, "Matt Wenn" <mwenn@...>
wrote:>> scum!> > HYPERLINK> " HYPERLINK
"http://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/content/news/story.aspx?brand=ENOnline&categ
"http://www.eveningn-ews24.co.-uk/content/-news/story.-aspx?brand=-ENOnline&
-categ>
ory=News&tBrand=-ENOnline&-tCategory=-News&itemid=-NOED24%20Apr%-202008%2016
%-3A54> %3A36%3A870" HYPERLINK
"http://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/content/news/story.aspx?brand=ENO"http://www
.eveningn-ews24.co.-uk/content/-news/story.-aspx?brand=-ENO>
nline&category=-News&tBrand=-ENOnline&-tCategory=-News&itemid=-NOED24%20Apr%
-20200> 8%2016%3A54%-3A36%3A870> > scum scum scum scum scum!!!!!> > No virus
found in this outgoing message.> Checked by AVG.> Ve rsion: 7.5.524 / Virus
Database: 269.23.4/1395 - Release Date: 24/04/2008> 07:24> > > > [Non-text
portions of this message have been removed]>

____________-_________-_________-_________-_________-_________-_
Search and win with BigSnapSearch.-com
HYPERLINK "http://www.bigsnapsearch.com"http://www.bigsnaps-earch.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.5/1398 - Release Date: 25/04/2008
14:31



No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.5/1398 - Release Date: 25/04/2008
14:31



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Typical of those who think they are above the law.
Brian
   ----- Original Message -----
   From: mls11x
   To: CN@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 1:03 PM
   Subject: [CN] Re: scum scum scum scum scum


   Someone should upload this to U-Tube! MLS

   --- In CN@yahoogroups.com, "Matt Wenn" <mwenn@...> wrote:
   >
   > scum!
   >
   > HYPERLINK
   > "http://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/content/news/story.aspx?
   brand=ENOnline&categ
   > ory=News&tBrand=ENOnline&tCategory=News&itemid=NOED24%20Apr%202008%
   2016%3A54
   > %3A36%3A870"http://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/content/news/story.aspx?
   brand=ENO
   > nline&category=News&tBrand=ENOnline&tCategory=News&itemid=NOED24%
   20Apr%20200
   > 8%2016%3A54%3A36%3A870
   >
   > scum scum scum scum scum!!!!!
   >
   > No virus found in this outgoing message.
   > Checked by AVG.
   > Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.4/1395 - Release Date:
   24/04/2008
   > 07:24
   >
   >
   >
   > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
   >





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Maybe he was drinking in his pub?

Oh no, that went bust, didnt it - fat scum t.at!


To: CN@...: mls11x@...: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:03:02
+0000Subject: [CN] Re: scum scum scum scum scum




Someone should upload this to U-Tube! MLS--- In CN@yahoogroups.com, "Matt Wenn"
<mwenn@...> wrote:>> scum!>  > HYPERLINK>
"http://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/content/news/story.aspx?brand=ENOnline&categ>
ory=News&tBrand=ENOnline&tCategory=News&itemid=NOED24%20Apr%202008%2016%3A54>
%3A36%3A870"http://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/content/news/story.aspx?brand=ENO>
nline&category=News&tBrand=ENOnline&tCategory=News&itemid=NOED24%20Apr%20200>
8%2016%3A54%3A36%3A870>  > scum scum scum scum scum!!!!!> > No virus found in
this outgoing message.> Checked by AVG.> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database:
269.23.4/1395 - Release Date: 24/04/2008> 07:24> > > > [Non-text portions of
this message have been removed]>






_________________________________________________________________
Search and win with BigSnapSearch.com
http://www.bigsnapsearch.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Someone should upload this to U-Tube! MLS

--- In CN@yahoogroups.com, "Matt Wenn" <mwenn@...> wrote:
>
> scum!
>  
> HYPERLINK
> "http://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/content/news/story.aspx?
brand=ENOnline&categ
> ory=News&tBrand=ENOnline&tCategory=News&itemid=NOED24%20Apr%202008%
2016%3A54
> %3A36%3A870"http://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/content/news/story.aspx?
brand=ENO
> nline&category=News&tBrand=ENOnline&tCategory=News&itemid=NOED24%
20Apr%20200
> 8%2016%3A54%3A36%3A870
>  
> scum scum scum scum scum!!!!!
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.4/1395 - Release Date:
24/04/2008
> 07:24
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

scum!
 
HYPERLINK
"http://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/content/news/story.aspx?brand=ENOnline&categ
ory=News&tBrand=ENOnline&tCategory=News&itemid=NOED24%20Apr%202008%2016%3A54
%3A36%3A870"http://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/content/news/story.aspx?brand=ENO
nline&category=News&tBrand=ENOnline&tCategory=News&itemid=NOED24%20Apr%20200
8%2016%3A54%3A36%3A870
 
scum scum scum scum scum!!!!!

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.4/1395 - Release Date: 24/04/2008
07:24



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

We were abysmal, if the ref had not been as bad as he was the crowd would have
been on the teams back more. Gibbs mite as well not been there and barn door
Jamie lived up to his name.
That was my first game in weeks and will now be my last of this season, thank
god.
I will be waiting to see what happens in the summer before I sell my season
ticket off to some other mug like me..........its got that bad.
Brian

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

If he's been given a chance by a Scottish team then how good is he?! 
 
Remember all the cr*p Peter G**** signed?
 
-----Original Message-----
From: CN@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CN@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Brian
Burrell
Sent: 17 April 2008 08:33
To: CN@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CN] Tom Miller



Tom Miller 17 city academy member has been told he's not good enough for us
but Glasgow Rangers have given him a 2 professional deal. Has anyone seen
the lad play? (I stopped going to reserve game when the club started to
enforced a restrictive seat rule.) With our long list of young loan player I
was surprised Miller was not given a chance?
Brian

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.13/1377 - Release Date: 14/04/2008
09:26



No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.13/1377 - Release Date: 14/04/2008
09:26



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Tom Miller 17 city academy member has been told he's not good enough for us but
Glasgow Rangers have given him a 2 professional deal. Has anyone seen the lad
play? (I stopped going to reserve game when the club started to enforced a
restrictive seat rule.) With our long list of young loan player I was surprised
Miller was not given a chance?
Brian

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

If my calulations are correct a win against West Brom on Saturday (giving us
55pts) will guarantee safety -  if either Leicester or Sheff Wed lose.

Defeat for Leicester reduces their maximum to 54 - even if they were to win (max
poss 57pts) it does not matter, as a defeat for Sheff Wed would reduce their
maximum to 55. By virtue of the fact they still have to meet, these totals are
not achievable by both teams. One team will drop 3 pts or both sides 2pts
bringing one of their totals below 55pts.

It gets better!

If we were to draw (53pts) then we would still be guaranteed safety if both
Leicester AND Sheff Wed lose (54 pts/55pts respectively). Again since one team
will drop 3pts or both sides 2pts the maximum available to one team will be
52pts

Hope I've got this right!

Ray


   ----- Original Message -----
   From: Brian Burrell
   To: CN@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 4:02 PM
   Subject: Re: [CN] After Sunday?


   I don't want to see us going down but if we did people would then understand
just how low the football club has got with the prudence doctrine controlling
all "on the pitch" investments when the ambitious "off the pitch" business
gobbles up what ever money the club gains from us fans and player sales.
   Brian
   ----- Original Message -----
   From: Rush
   To: CN@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 3:12 PM
   Subject: RE: [CN] After Sunday?

   Lets survive this season in the old second division first, I never thought
   we would go down and still don't...but I'm getting a bit nervous Brian.

   OTBC

   From: CN@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CN@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Brian
   Burrell
   Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 15:14
   To: CN@yahoogroups.com
   Subject: [CN] After Sunday?

   After Sunday this boards attitude to how much "on the pitch" investment
   takes place in the summer will be the most important desertion they have to
   take. It will decide their own future and the clubs. I personally cant see
   the fan base putting up with the club languishing in the bottom third of the
   old second division for another season without saying something on mass.
   Brian

   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






------------------------------------------------------------------------------


   No virus found in this incoming message.
   Checked by AVG.
   Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.22.13/1377 - Release Date: 14/04/2008
09:26


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I don't want to see us going down but if we did people would then understand
just how low the football club has got with the prudence doctrine controlling
all "on the pitch" investments when the ambitious "off the pitch" business
gobbles up what ever money the club gains from us fans and player sales.
Brian
   ----- Original Message -----
   From: Rush
   To: CN@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 3:12 PM
   Subject: RE: [CN] After Sunday?


   Lets survive this season in the old second division first, I never thought
   we would go down and still don't...but I'm getting a bit nervous Brian.

   OTBC

   From: CN@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CN@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Brian
   Burrell
   Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 15:14
   To: CN@yahoogroups.com
   Subject: [CN] After Sunday?

   After Sunday this boards attitude to how much "on the pitch" investment
   takes place in the summer will be the most important desertion they have to
   take. It will decide their own future and the clubs. I personally cant see
   the fan base putting up with the club languishing in the bottom third of the
   old second division for another season without saying something on mass.
   Brian

   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Lets survive this season in the old second division first, I never thought
we would go down and still don't...but I'm getting a bit nervous Brian.

OTBC



From: CN@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CN@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Brian
Burrell
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 15:14
To: CN@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CN] After Sunday?



After Sunday this boards attitude to how much "on the pitch" investment
takes place in the summer will be the most important desertion they have to
take. It will decide their own future and the clubs. I personally cant see
the fan base putting up with the club languishing in the bottom third of the
old second division for another season without saying something on mass.
Brian

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

After Sunday this boards attitude to how much "on the pitch" investment takes
place in the summer will be the most important desertion they have to take. It
will decide their own future and the clubs. I personally cant see the fan base
putting up with the club languishing in the bottom third of the old second
division for another season without saying something on mass.
Brian

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Congrats Matt hope all goes well . I've been there and done that.

OTBC



From: CN@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CN@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Brian
Burrell
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 12:48
To: CN@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CN] Another Norwich Fan...



Congrats Matt keep up the good work ;o))
Brian
----- Original Message -----
From: Matt Wenn
To: CN@yahoogroups.com <mailto:CN%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 9:31 AM
Subject: [CN] Another Norwich Fan...

Angelina Wenn was born on 11/04/08 at 12:48 pm, weighing 1lb 5oz (600
grams).

A 'little' premature at 24 weeks and 4 days, but is doing well so far and is
looking forward to her first victory over the Scum on this coming Sunday!

I thought I has done well to get a due day outside of the footy season (28th
July), but Angelina had other ideas! Mum is doing well.

Matt

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.11/1368 - Release Date: 09/04/2008
16:20

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

If I can get a life support unit, an ambulance and a few doctors to agree to
it then yeah! LOL.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: CN@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CN@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of mls11x
Sent: 12 April 2008 14:52
To: CN@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CN] Re: Another Norwich Fan...



Many congrats Matt. Will she be at Portman Road tomorrow? MLS

--- In HYPERLINK "mailto:CN%40yahoogroups.com"CN@yahoogroups.-com, "Matt
Wenn" <mwenn@...> wrote:
>
> Angelina Wenn was born on 11/04/08 at 12:48 pm, weighing 1lb 5oz (600
> grams).
>
> A 'little' premature at 24 weeks and 4 days, but is doing well so
far and is
> looking forward to her first victory over the Scum on this coming
Sunday!
>
> I thought I has done well to get a due day outside of the footy
season (28th
> July), but Angelina had other ideas! Mum is doing well.
>
> Matt
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.11/1368 - Release Date:
09/04/2008
> 16:20
>






No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.13/1375 - Release Date: 12/04/2008
11:32



No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.13/1375 - Release Date: 12/04/2008
11:32



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

The next generation of Windows Live is here
http://www.windowslive.co.uk/get-live

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Like a lot of Ricky's emails, it was filtered as SPAM! MLS

On 13/04/2008, Dweller On the Threshold <dwellmeister@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Ricky
> Thanks for this... dunno why it took so long to arrive.
> The current version of the article's being discussed at
>
>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/History_of_No\
rwich_City_F.C
>
> Cheers
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:06 PM, ricky bilverstone <
> ricky_bilverstone@...> wrote:
>
> >
> > <<<< In the second round, they faced Bayern Munich of Germany in
> > xxxxxxxxxx mismatch, odds etc. Norwich won the tie 3–2 on aggregate,
> > including becoming the only English team to beat Bayern Munich in the
> > Olympic Stadium.[44][45] >>>>
> > We are infact the only BRITISH side to have done this and will always
> be,
> > now...
> >
> > It then asks 'what happend to Megson' - this link tells all
> > http://www.ex-canaries.co.uk/players/megson.htm
> >
> >
> >
> > To: CN@...: dwellmeister@...: Tue, 1 Apr
> > 2008 14:34:34 +0100Subject: [CN] Wikipedia: History of Norwich City F.C.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Norwich_City_F.C.)
> > isnow complete and is currently being Peer Reviewed athttp://
>
> >
>
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/History_of_Norwich_City_F.C./archive\
1.Itwouldbe useful to know if you consider the article to be factuallyincorrect
>
> > in any way, biased, or distorted. As you can imagine, the articleonly
> > contains information deemed to be "historic" or
> trulysignificant/fascinating
> > (!) in the club's history.Once the Peer Review is complete, the article
> will
> > be considered forFeatured Status. NCFC already has one featured article
> and
> > one featured list- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwich_City_F.C.
> > andhttp://
>
> >
>
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Norwich_City_F.C._Players_of_the_YearFutureproject\
salready under way to varying degrees of quality are:
> >
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrow_Roadhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nor\
wich_City_F.C._managershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Norwich_City_F.C._Ha\
ll_of_Fame_membershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Norwich_City_F.C._club_re\
cordsAshortlist of users who have identified themselves as City fans can alsobe
> > found athttp://
> >
> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedian_Norwich_City_F.C._fans[Non-text<
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedian_Norwich_City_F.C._fans%5BNon-te\
xt>portions
> of this message have been removed]
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get Hotmail on your mobile. Text MSN to 63463 now!
> > http://mobile.uk.msn.com/pc/mail.aspx
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > * * * * * *
> >
> > To unsubscribe from Canary News, send an email to:
> > CN-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > To join in the discussions and receive emails from other members, please
> > contact me directly: <mls11x@...> MLSYahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> * * * * * *
>
> To unsubscribe from Canary News, send an email to:
> CN-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> To join in the discussions and receive emails from other members, please
> contact me directly: <mls11x@...> MLSYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Congrats Matt keep up the good work ;o))
Brian
   ----- Original Message -----
   From: Matt Wenn
   To: CN@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 9:31 AM
   Subject: [CN] Another Norwich Fan...


   Angelina Wenn was born on 11/04/08 at 12:48 pm, weighing 1lb 5oz (600
   grams).

   A 'little' premature at 24 weeks and 4 days, but is doing well so far and is
   looking forward to her first victory over the Scum on this coming Sunday!

   I thought I has done well to get a due day outside of the footy season (28th
   July), but Angelina had other ideas! Mum is doing well.

   Matt

   No virus found in this outgoing message.
   Checked by AVG.
   Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.11/1368 - Release Date: 09/04/2008
   16:20





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hi Ricky
Thanks for this... dunno why it took so long to arrive.
The current version of the article's being discussed at

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/History_of_No\
rwich_City_F.C

Cheers

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:06 PM, ricky bilverstone <
ricky_bilverstone@...> wrote:

>
> <<<< In the second round, they faced Bayern Munich of Germany in
> xxxxxxxxxx mismatch, odds etc. Norwich won the tie 3–2 on aggregate,
> including becoming the only English team to beat Bayern Munich in the
> Olympic Stadium.[44][45] >>>>
> We are infact the only BRITISH side to have done this and will always be,
> now...
>
> It then asks 'what happend to Megson' - this link tells all
> http://www.ex-canaries.co.uk/players/megson.htm
>
>
>
> To: CN@...: dwellmeister@...: Tue, 1 Apr
> 2008 14:34:34 +0100Subject: [CN] Wikipedia: History of Norwich City F.C.
>
>
>
>
> This article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Norwich_City_F.C.)
> isnow complete and is currently being Peer Reviewed athttp://
>
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/History_of_Norwich_City_F.C./archive\
1.Itwould be useful to know if you consider the article to be factuallyincorrect
> in any way, biased, or distorted. As you can imagine, the articleonly
> contains information deemed to be "historic" or trulysignificant/fascinating
> (!) in the club's history.Once the Peer Review is complete, the article will
> be considered forFeatured Status. NCFC already has one featured article and
> one featured list- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwich_City_F.C.
> andhttp://
>
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Norwich_City_F.C._Players_of_the_YearFutureproject\
s already under way to varying degrees of quality are:
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrow_Roadhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nor\
wich_City_F.C._managershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Norwich_City_F.C._Ha\
ll_of_Fame_membershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Norwich_City_F.C._club_re\
cordsAshort list of users who have identified themselves as City fans can alsobe
> found athttp://
>
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedian_Norwich_City_F.C._fans[Non-text<http:/\
/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedian_Norwich_City_F.C._fans%5BNon-text>por\
tions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get Hotmail on your mobile. Text MSN to 63463 now!
> http://mobile.uk.msn.com/pc/mail.aspx
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> * * * * * *
>
> To unsubscribe from Canary News, send an email to:
> CN-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> To join in the discussions and receive emails from other members, please
> contact me directly: <mls11x@...> MLSYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

<<<< In the second round, they faced Bayern Munich of Germany in xxxxxxxxxx
mismatch, odds etc. Norwich won the tie 3–2 on aggregate, including becoming the
only English team to beat Bayern Munich in the Olympic Stadium.[44][45] >>>>
We are infact the only BRITISH side to have done this and will always be, now...

It then asks 'what happend to Megson' - this link tells all
http://www.ex-canaries.co.uk/players/megson.htm



To: CN@...: dwellmeister@...: Tue, 1 Apr 2008
14:34:34 +0100Subject: [CN] Wikipedia: History of Norwich City F.C.




This article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Norwich_City_F.C.) isnow
complete and is currently being Peer Reviewed
athttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/History_of_Norwich_City_F.C\
./archive1.It would be useful to know if you consider the article to be
factuallyincorrect in any way, biased, or distorted. As you can imagine, the
articleonly contains information deemed to be "historic" or
trulysignificant/fascinating (!) in the club's history.Once the Peer Review is
complete, the article will be considered forFeatured Status. NCFC already has
one featured article and one featured list-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwich_City_F.C.
andhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Norwich_City_F.C._Players_of_the_YearFut\
ure projects already under way to varying degrees of quality
are:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrow_Roadhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of\
_Norwich_City_F.C._managershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Norwich_City_F.C\
._Hall_of_Fame_membershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Norwich_City_F.C._clu\
b_recordsA short list of users who have identified themselves as City fans can
alsobe found
athttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedian_Norwich_City_F.C._fans[Non-te\
xt portions of this message have been removed]






_________________________________________________________________
Get Hotmail on your mobile. Text MSN to 63463 now!
http://mobile.uk.msn.com/pc/mail.aspx

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Many congrats Matt. Will she be at Portman Road tomorrow? MLS

--- In CN@yahoogroups.com, "Matt Wenn" <mwenn@...> wrote:
>
> Angelina Wenn was born on 11/04/08 at 12:48 pm, weighing 1lb 5oz (600
> grams).
>
> A 'little' premature at 24 weeks and 4 days, but is doing well so
far and is
> looking forward to her first victory over the Scum on this coming
Sunday!
>
> I thought I has done well to get a due day outside of the footy
season (28th
> July), but Angelina had other ideas!  Mum is doing well.
>
> Matt
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.11/1368 - Release Date:
09/04/2008
> 16:20
>

Angelina Wenn was born on 11/04/08 at 12:48 pm, weighing 1lb 5oz (600
grams).

A 'little' premature at 24 weeks and 4 days, but is doing well so far and is
looking forward to her first victory over the Scum on this coming Sunday!

I thought I has done well to get a due day outside of the footy season (28th
July), but Angelina had other ideas!  Mum is doing well.

Matt

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.11/1368 - Release Date: 09/04/2008
16:20

This article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Norwich_City_F.C.) is
now complete and is currently being Peer Reviewed at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/History_of_Norwich_City_F.C./\
archive1
.

It would be useful to know if you consider the article to be factually
incorrect in any way, biased, or distorted. As you can imagine, the article
only contains information deemed to be "historic" or truly
significant/fascinating (!) in the club's history.

Once the Peer Review is complete, the article will be considered for
Featured Status. NCFC already has one featured article and one featured list
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwich_City_F.C. and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Norwich_City_F.C._Players_of_the_Year

Future projects already under way to varying degrees of quality are:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrow_Road
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Norwich_City_F.C._managers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Norwich_City_F.C._Hall_of_Fame_members
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Norwich_City_F.C._club_records

A short list of users who have identified themselves as City fans can also
be found at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedian_Norwich_City_F.C._fans


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

That shows just how unfit he is for the post he holds and if the Chairman
was a scrap of use he would sack him.   How can the supporters be too
ambitious?  Conversely, the Board and Doncaster are not ambitious enough,
well they are when it comes to chip pans, fat fryers and fax machines.

Doncaster has absolutely no idea how a true supporter feels.   Of course
they want the Club to do well and compete and be amongst the best.  The man
has more front than the new Wembley.   For someone who makes a very good
living out of NCFC and lacks the real qualifications essential for the post
that he holds might prefer that his relatively easy life is not disturbed
too much.

Sell out - that happened years ago.

Malcolm Vasey


----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Burrell" <bwburrell@...>
To: <CN@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: [CN] Re: Result: City 5-1 Colchester (Otsemobor, Cureton 3,
Dublin)


> It was a good result from a poor game but I cant get over the shock of Mr
> Doncaster saying in his EDP column that us city fans are too ambitious and
> getting in another investor in the club would be selling out, oh yes and
> he compares us to Gretna?
>
> Good to see barn door Jamie finding the barn again, just think where we
> could have been if he had put away a quarter of the sitters he's missed
> this season.
> Brian
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: mls11x
>  To: CN@yahoogroups.com
>  Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 12:51 AM
>  Subject: [CN] Re: Result: City 5-1 Colchester (Otsemobor, Cureton 3,
> Dublin)
>
>
>  One good result any everyone goes deathly quiet! MLS
>
>  --- In CN@yahoogroups.com, "mls11x" <mls11x@...> wrote:
>  >
>  > For those of you yet to hear the news, I thought I'd post a very quick
>  > summary of City's biggest victory of the season.
>  >
>  > The rout started inside the first ten minutes when Jon Otsemobor
>  > waltzed through the Colchester defence, evaded a 'tackle' by Darel
>  > Russell and fired home from just inside the box.
>  >
>  > After half an hour Jamie Cureton fired home a close-range volley
>  > following good work from Huckerby down the right; a good finish, but
>  > the marking was non-existent.
>  >
>  > Colchester hit back just before the break when Jason Shackell could
>  > only head a long clearance into Kevin Lisbie's path. The ex-City loan
>  > striker rounded Marshall and slotted home.
>  >
>  > The second half also got off to a storming start, with Dion Dublin
>  > hitting the cross bar with an audacious lob from 35 yards, and we
>  > didn't have to wait long to restore our two goal advantage when
>  > Cureton doubled his tally from the penalty spot, after Pattison was
>  > felled in the six yard box.
>  >
>  > And Cureton grabbed his first hat-trick for City as the game drew to a
>  > close with the pick of the bunch: new boy Maceo Rigters did well down
>  > the left, turning sharply to fire a cross into the box. Dion laid the
>  > ball into Cureton's path, and the in-form striker curled a delightful
>  > side-foot shot around one defender and out of the keeper's reach.
>  >
>  > But City were not finished yet. In injury time, Dion produced a
>  > wonderful chip from the edge of the area, which cleared the keeper and
>  > nestled in the back of the net as every City player piled on top of
>  > the striker.
>  >
>  > The result eased our relegation worries, lifting us five points clear
>  > of the bottom three, and for those of an overly optimistic nature took
>  > us within just ten points of a play-off place. Unfortunately, with
>  > just six games and eighteen points remaining, I fear that we're
>  > unlikely to make up that ground! MLS
>  >
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> * * * * * *
>
> To unsubscribe from Canary News, send an email to:
> CN-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> To join in the discussions and receive emails from other members, please
> contact me directly: <mls11x@...> MLSYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>