Alex -

Thanks. I converted to something I can graph being the visual kinda
guy I am. Makes sense, and ties with the elevation chart on your
website. I've posted the Excel spreadsheet in the Files tab just in
case anybody else is interested.

Clark


--- In Bikerpelli@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Hearn" <alex@b...> wrote:
>
> Every year we have a good Stan's discussion, check back thru the
earlier
> posts & you'll find all sorts of good stuff.
>
> Someone sent me these GPS points a year or two back, I don't know
if they're
> accurate, useful or even on-trail:
>
> TOPO! GPS Data Format DegMin NAD83 ElevFeet Local-Time
> TOPO! GPS Route,KT0 TO KT49
> KT0,39,10.602,-108,48.474,4524,09/23/2003,19:24:40,
> KT1,39,10.423,-108,50.453,4897,09/23/2003,19:25:10,
> KT2,39,10.986,-108,52.055,4920,09/23/2003,19:25:10,
> KT3,39,11.696,-108,51.762,4745,09/23/2003,19:25:11,
> KT4,39,11.499,-108,53.831,4776,09/23/2003,19:25:11,
> KT5,39,12.778,-108,54.375,4464,09/23/2003,19:25:12,
> KT6,39,12.825,-108,55.182,4817,09/23/2003,19:25:12,
> KT7,39,13.429,-108,54.587,4928,09/23/2003,19:25:12,
> KT8,39,13.543,-108,57.702,4892,09/23/2003,19:25:13,
> KT9,39,11.086,-108,59.587,4724,09/23/2003,19:25:14,
> KT10,39,11.300,-109,00.486,4661,09/23/2003,19:25:15,
> KT11,39,08.617,-109,02.687,4697,09/23/2003,19:25:16,
> KT12,39,07.819,-109,04.768,4626,09/23/2003,19:25:17,
> KT13,39,08.226,-109,06.021,4532,09/23/2003,19:25:18,
> KT14,39,09.898,-109,06.352,4598,09/23/2003,19:25:19,
> KT15,39,09.358,-109,07.221,4951,09/23/2003,19:25:20,
> KT16,39,08.168,-109,06.679,5032,09/23/2003,19:25:21,
> KT17,39,06.939,-109,08.925,4483,09/23/2003,19:25:22,
> KT18,39,04.898,-109,07.467,4337,09/23/2003,19:25:24,
> KT19,39,04.517,-109,09.755,4521,09/23/2003,19:25:24,
> KT20,39,01.303,-109,13.018,4435,09/23/2003,19:25:25,
> KT21,39,00.681,-109,14.635,4331,09/23/2003,19:25:26,
> KT22,38,59.306,-109,14.620,4368,09/23/2003,19:25:27,
> KT23,38,57.030,-109,16.528,4311,09/23/2003,19:25:28,
> KT24,38,54.056,-109,14.975,4324,09/23/2003,19:25:29,
> KT25,38,51.989,-109,16.569,4117,09/23/2003,19:25:31,
> KT26,38,51.916,-109,17.693,4133,09/23/2003,19:25:31,
> KT27,38,49.379,-109,17.002,4116,09/23/2003,19:25:33,
> KT28,38,48.661,-109,18.197,4129,09/23/2003,19:25:33,
> KT29,38,48.168,-109,16.487,4259,09/23/2003,19:25:35,
> KT30,38,46.441,-109,15.632,4978,09/23/2003,19:25:36,
> KT31,38,45.898,-109,13.287,4919,09/23/2003,19:25:37,
> KT32,38,43.599,-109,12.089,6331,09/23/2003,19:25:39,
> KT33,38,43.784,-109,10.050,5414,09/23/2003,19:25:40,
> KT34,38,42.139,-109,12.824,5680,09/23/2003,19:25:41,
> KT35,38,40.599,-109,12.701,5781,09/23/2003,19:25:43,
> KT36,38,42.728,-109,09.793,5774,09/23/2003,19:25:44,
> KT37,38,41.071,-109,10.345,6550,09/23/2003,19:25:45,
> KT38,38,38.678,-109,09.449,7537,09/23/2003,19:25:46,
> KT39,38,36.666,-109,11.428,7856,09/23/2003,19:25:47,
> KT40,38,36.954,-109,14.060,8288,09/23/2003,19:25:49,
> KT41,38,35.438,-109,15.535,7279,09/23/2003,19:25:50,
> KT42,38,35.713,-109,17.435,6500,09/23/2003,19:25:51,
> KT43,38,33.244,-109,17.256,7746,09/23/2003,19:25:52,
> KT44,38,32.543,-109,18.742,8328,09/23/2003,19:25:53,
> KT45,38,33.702,-109,19.631,7778,09/23/2003,19:25:53,
> KT46,38,33.904,-109,21.195,7378,09/23/2003,19:25:54,
> KT47,38,35.133,-109,22.782,6774,09/23/2003,19:25:55,
> KT48,38,34.482,-109,26.549,5466,09/23/2003,19:25:56,
> KT49,38,34.886,-109,31.216,4619,09/23/2003,19:25:57,
>
>
> The Latitude 40 maps are in lat/long, I don't think there's any
UTM info on
> them.
>
>
> Alex Hearn
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bikerpelli@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Bikerpelli@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of cryptocrystalline
> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 9:34 AM
> To: Bikerpelli@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Bikerpelli] GPS Use, Stan's no-tube
>
> Has anybody done the Kokopelli with a GPS unit? Do you have the
> waypoints that can be downloaded or keyed in to another unit? Will
the
> map offered by Bikerpelli have UTM coordinates on it?
>
> Also, Stan's tubeless system seems to have about a 50-50
> survival/success rate, if you believe the comments on
BikeReviews . If
> you have to carry an extra tube and pump anyway, is there a
compelling
> reason to convert? Assuming I convert, any recommendations as to
the
> best tire to use for the Kokopelli?
>
> Thanks
> Clark
> First-timer, looking for an excuse to buy a new toy
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>