100% right.
The sad part is that Hill has all the talent in the world and the only thing
holding him back is himself. Almost like he tries to avoid success because he
can't live up to his own expectations.
He needs a sports psychologist more than a pitching coach.
________________________________
From: hbc_7840 <fang_guy@...>
To: BaltimOrioles@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2009 4:24:57 PM
Subject: BaltimOrioles Re: Hill is out for the year
Well, if that's true, it's a damn shame. It's always a shame to see
such talent to to waste, regardless of team, unless the team is the
Yankees or Colts.
--- In BaltimOrioles@ yahoogroups. com, Scott Rendler <itzscott1@. ..>
wrote:
>
> Like I've posted before....
>
> The guy's his own worst enemy, a head case and a quitter.
>
> Going to the O's was a great opportunity for him, but it looks like
Hill will always be what he is.
>
>
>
>
> ____________ _________ _________ __
> From: joes06 <kingjoey@.. .>
> To: BaltimOrioles@ yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2009 1:29:10 PM
> Subject: BaltimOrioles Re: Hill is out for the year
>
>
> Well Roch said elbw but what's the differencce, he will be on the
DL
> starting the year.And Adam Jones has a stiff forearm but he'll be
ok
> soon.
>
> --- In BaltimOrioles@ yahoogroups. com, "hbc_7840" <fang_guy@ .>
wrote:
> >
> > He was scratched today due to "shoulder stiffness", which, of
> course,
> > according to the FO, is "nothing" and is "to be expected this
time
> of
> > year". David pauley will take his place, and Hill will most
likely
> go
> > Tuesday instead.
> >
> > Yeah, right. I believe you. We all believe you. Exactly whom do
> they
> > think they are kidding? To be fair, all clubs do it (Detroit is
> going
> > through this right now with Bonderman), but I don't know why. Why
> > don't they simply say "Hill's arm is dead and we are shutting him
> down
> > for the year for surgery and we will most likely not get so much
as
> a
> > single inning out of him for the rest of time?" and get it over
> with
> > instead of torturing the fan base by forcing us to hope that what
> we
> > know to be true isn't actually true?
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]