I would go with the Mark II Ruger.

You can get the trigger worked on and it makes a good bullseye gun.

They are not to expensive and are built like a tank.

That's my .02.

Court in FL.
----- Original Message -----
From: jdouglas70
To: BULLSEYESHOOTERS@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 11:17 AM
Subject: [BULLSEYESHOOTERS] Ruger Mark II or III vs Berrata NEOS U22 or
Sugestions


New to the group. My wife and I shoot in a Bullseye league. She shoots
a High Standard 107 which dose not fit her small hand at all I let her
shoot my Browning Buckamark target which is also way to big for her
hand. She tried a Ruger Mark II which seems to fit better and I found
some information on the Berretta NEOS U22. Question:
1) From the looks of the Browning and High Standard 107 we can not
really get a set a smaller grips due to the frame design.....IS it
possible to get smaller grips for High Standard 107 or Browning
Buckmark ?
2) IS there any sugetions on a Bullseye .22 that fits someone with
small hands ?
3)How dose the Ruger Mark II or III compare to the Beretta NEOS U22
from....Function, quality, accuracy for Bullseye shooting?
Thanks in advance





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]