Having problems with message search?
A typical example would be close to a hoop where it is possible, after the roquet, for the striker's ball to hit the hoop and then return to the mallet face. This is a fault.
Samir
From: AUS-Croquet@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AUS-Croquet@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ted
Sent: 04 May 2008 00:42
To: AUS-Croquet@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [AUS-Croquet] Law 28 (d) (1)
Sent: 04 May 2008 00:42
To: AUS-Croquet@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [AUS-Croquet] Law 28 (d) (1)
What would be the circumstances where exemption A does not apply "if the striker's ball has hit another object after making the roquet". Page 32 Second Edition Amended 2008. Does anyone have any ideas on this one?With in court cannons where you have a situation where the balls are adjacent to the hoop and in the placement of the balls one that was not starting to run its hoop in order prior to the cannon placement, now is, surely a common sense extension of 14 (d) (3) would apply? or is this situation specifically mentioned elsewhere?TedCaloundra
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.8/1415 - Release Date: 05/05/2008 06:01
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.8/1415 - Release Date: 05/05/2008 06:01
Offline 
Send Email